It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 1:13 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 226 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #201 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:25 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
topazg wrote:
ketchup wrote:
For kibitzers until end of game then it's for all.

Yea! That's the way to play handi-go! Create many many weak groups and hope your opponent makes a mistake in reading linking all of them up! YEA!

No but seriously, I know sometimes it IS needed(and possibly might be the only option), but this just seems overkill. That would be fine too, if magicwand explained it, but that's not the case here. More than that, I feel like the general thought by magicwand is, "I don't care to read what he will do, or what I will do. I will win because I'm stronger."

It wouldn't even be so bad if magicwand actually even tried to put some variations down, but there's nothing like that either. It's unexplained ego, not confidence. It might be his act, but isn't he going too far?

Anyone feel the same way? I didn't mind his earlier games because I could see potential for what he was doing. This time, it feels like it's bordering on rudeness, and I'm not too sure I understand.


I don't know, he makes it sooo easy to root for "the other guy" :D

I'm enjoying the game, it's entertainment to me, and it's really interesting to watch how Kirby crumbles psychologically. He needs a morale coach and I think he'd gain 2 stones in strength overnight or something.


Chew Terr mentioned something like this, too. I'm not really sure how to fix this directly, though.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #202 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:27 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Kirby wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . B O . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . X , . X . . . X X O . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O . X . . O . X . O . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]



Does anyone else have doubts about the wisdom of attaching to a weak stone?


I agree about not touching a weak stone. But is this white stone really weak? I thought that it was strong since it was backed by white's influence. I felt that attaching would help me to do something inside his area of influence.

Is it really a weak stone?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #203 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:28 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Araban wrote:
This move that Black made stunned me. You get many, many hours to make your move and yet just a few seconds of deep thought was all that was needed for Kirby to realize how bad this move really is (Magicwand's response should make it pretty obvious). His reasoning was also an incorrect application of the best move being your opponent's best move.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . B . X X X X O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . O X O X O . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . X X O O O . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . X , . X X . . X X O . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O . X . . O . X . O . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Is it bad because it eliminates the possibility of the cut at K5? Just plain aji keshi? I can kind of feel that it's bad, but I don't quite understand.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #204 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:30 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Harleqin wrote:
Living is all he wanted, and living is all he got.


This is kind of accurate. Should I have aimed for something other than living inside before attaching to the lone white stone?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #205 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:32 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
I posted a few questions about the comments that I saw throughout the game. Please feel free to answer them (to anyone).

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #206 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:55 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Kirby wrote:
Magicwand wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | B . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

i dont think what i played is correct but i dont think Kerby can find a way to take an advantage of it.
i think it might rattle his patience and force him to an overplay.


What is correct here?


i dont have definite answer here but i will try to explain.
i can play thick with no aji. but it would be slower. but i think it would be correct.
what i played is full of bad aji.
if you try to make something happend right now..you probably get nothing.
remember lower right corner you tried a move that threaten my two stone.
it is strong but full of bad aji.
i didnt move until the right time.
when the time is right you can activate the bad aji.
when is the right time??? it is too hard to explain that i dont even know the right answer to that.
i dont know if this answer helped but i tried.

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson


This post by Magicwand was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #207 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:56 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 653
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Liked others: 54
Was liked: 216
Bill Spight wrote:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . B . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . B . . . . . 1 . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:b1: is the obvious play, Not only is it a big point, it has a good relation to the marked stones.

People sometimes shrug off opening mistakes of this kind by saying that it only costs a point or two. But if you lost 2 points on every move you would get crushed. I would not be surprised if the difference between this play and the play in the game is more than two points.

Edit: Unhidden.


Kirby wrote:
I don't understand this, exactly. Isn't it big for white to approach on the left? It seems that he can complement his influence well this way.


Before Black's move there, The bottom 11 lines wide, the left is 6 lines wide. So the bottom is bigger.


This post by yoyoma was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #208 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:58 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2116
Location: Silicon Valley
Liked others: 152
Was liked: 330
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Kirby wrote:
daniel_the_smith wrote:
Kirby wrote:

I am going to keep my lead this game. Mark my words.


By pushing along the second line? O.o



Is there a better response to his attachment?


I said that mostly because you said you were threatening to keep going into the left side. And I don't know if it's better, but I would have tenuki'd after that attachment unless I thought the corner would die. I really can't stand getting pushed around like that. If black can't tenuki, then black must have made a mistake previously.

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com


This post by daniel_the_smith was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #209 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:00 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Kirby wrote:
Harleqin wrote:
Living is all he wanted, and living is all he got.


This is kind of accurate. Should I have aimed for something other than living inside before attaching to the lone white stone?


no. if you die you lose even quicker.
you should tried to live by distroying eveything i have. which was possible i think.
you gave me too much influence and points so you lose even if you live.

attach move was not to my likeing..means looked kyuish.
i dont know what was better at that point.
maybe someone stronger can answer that question.

but i can tell you...if i was playing black i wouldn't put myself in that situation to start with.
see the difference?

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson


This post by Magicwand was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #210 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:09 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Kirby wrote:
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Kirby wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . B O . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . X , . X . . . X X O . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O . X . . O . X . O . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]



Does anyone else have doubts about the wisdom of attaching to a weak stone?


I agree about not touching a weak stone. But is this white stone really weak? I thought that it was strong since it was backed by white's influence. I felt that attaching would help me to do something inside his area of influence.

Is it really a weak stone?


i can not answer your question because i dont have exact definition of weak stone.
but i can give you many points that is a better move than your move.
i would have played 'b' but all three points are better move than yours.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . b . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . a C O . c . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . X , . X . . . X X O . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O . X . . O . X . O . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #211 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:12 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Kirby wrote:
Chew Terr mentioned something like this, too. I'm not really sure how to fix this directly, though.


one way that i know is...you play me with crazy handycap and lose some...and eventually you will feel comfortable and get stronger and win..
i think this is the whole point of Kerby-magicwand series.

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson


This post by Magicwand was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #212 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:17 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Kirby wrote:
Harleqin wrote:
Definitely overplay, but I would be interested in other players' opinions on how to best exploit this situation.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . 1 2 . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O . X . . O . X . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


My idea would be to lean here, in order to cap the left group afterwards.


Your idea is similar to what mine was during the game.


yes...but both missed something...
i wouldnt play 2 because it will put me deeper into trouble.
i know i played an overplay..but i minimized the damage by using them as an aji to seal the middle.
if i can play 2 and exchang with 3 then my 2 will help secure the middle...which is good enough for me.
but..before kill my aji i used it to create another aji in the corner.

it is all about the aji. when you have 1 stone then it is very flexable. once you make it 2 stone then you are no longer flexable.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . 2 . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . 1 3 . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O . X . . O . X . . . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson


This post by Magicwand was liked by 2 people: Kirby, SpongeBob
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #213 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:39 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Kirby wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Kirby wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=0, W=0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . O . . X . O . . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Now it's time to play this move, I think. It is big for both white and black. I don't have any tricky moves to reduce white's influence right now - but I don't think I need any. I'm going to win on territory alone!


My feeling is that this is an unwise approach. It may be successful at 3 stones, but. . . . Black has already gone for peanuts in the top right corner, while apparently letting his pincer stone die a dog's death. I believe in sacrifice, but really!

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=0, W=0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . O . . X . O . . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


It seems to me that after :w2: Black has already lost one stone of his advantage, if not more.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=0, W=0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O . . B . O . . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . O . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


IMO, this is more like it. :) :b1: keeps White from expanding his framework here, and calls, albeit distantly, to :bc: . It also threatens to make a nice framework on the left side.

Edit: Unhidden.


I don't really understand this. If I am going to try to play territorially, isn't it inconsistent to break up the framework?


If it is, so what? Style is style. It doesn't mean making inferior plays.

Judgement is one thing. It improves with experience. But, as I said, I feel that the approach is wrong. "Just let me live here and there and I will win on territory." If you just make territory you will lose points. Your gamble is that you won't lose enough for White to overcome the handicap.


Quote:
I feel like the 3-3 is worth a lot of points. Is my intuition just bad?


As for this particular situation, the 3-3 is typically a double sente. If White plays there Black should make a base; if Black plays there White should protect his territory and group. In this case, however, the 3-3 is not sente for Black, as Magicwand points out. Enlarging his framework is bigger than defending his territory on the side. By the same token, reducing the framework is bigger than the 3-3. (It also makes a base. And in addition it threatens a framework on the left side.)

FWIW, Magicwand and I agree about both the assessment of the position and the play. That doesn't mean that we are right, OC. ;)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


Last edited by Bill Spight on Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

This post by Bill Spight was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #214 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:10 pm 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4844
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Liked others: 62
Was liked: 505
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Bill Spight wrote:
FWIW, Magicwand and I agree about both the assessment of the position and the play. That doesn't mean that we are right, OC. ;)


i said many times in this forum there are two side to the coin.
1) is the direction correct? correct idea and motive?
2) if it is is it right way to play?
#2 is very hard and even professionals have different opinion on how to play.
but..#1 is easier than #2 because usually there are limited number of places you can play.
both Bill and I had correct idea and direction and motive. (i think)
but did we have optimal play? that is too hard and i will not answer and only give my opinion.
if you can improve on #1 the your game will improve much faster.

_________________
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson


This post by Magicwand was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #215 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:13 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Magicwand wrote:
...
i can not answer your question because i dont have exact definition of weak stone.
but i can give you many points that is a better move than your move.
i would have played 'b' but all three points are better move than yours.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . b . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . a C O . c . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . X , . X . . . X X O . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O . X . . O . X . O . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


With "a", I was a bit afraid of the following at some point in the future:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . b . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . B C O . c . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . 2 1 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . 4 3 . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . X 5 . X . . . X X O . |
$$ | . . X X . . . O 6 X 7 . O . X . O . . |
$$ | . O X O O . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


but maybe I didn't need to worry about it at all. It seemed like dangerous aji.

"b" seems good, but don't you win on points still, then?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #216 Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:17 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Magicwand wrote:
Kirby wrote:
Chew Terr mentioned something like this, too. I'm not really sure how to fix this directly, though.


one way that i know is...you play me with crazy handycap and lose some...and eventually you will feel comfortable and get stronger and win..
i think this is the whole point of Kerby-magicwand series.


Yes, that's exactly right. Sorry for the bad attitude.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #217 Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:03 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Kirby wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Kirby wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Well, I have sente. I don't really understand Magicwand's last sequence. I think that it's missing the big picture. Magicwand's influence is already pretty great, so it seemed to me that he should have used it. I suppose it's a bit stronger now, but he gave me the opportunity to simply grab more territory.

I feel completely at ease with this game right now. Maybe he'll play something like K8 next. I'm not sure what's best, though.

I considered playing a large knight's enclosure, but it's not good because white can then play somewhere in the center and make one of my enclosures ineffective.


This play baffles me. As well as the fact the Kirby only mentions the large knight's extension as an alternative. What is so great about the left side? White is already strong there. Black has no attack, and the remaining 2 space extension is small. In addition, what relation does this play have with Black's other stones?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . B . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . B . . . . . 1 . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


:b1: is the obvious play, Not only is it a big point, it has a good relation to the marked stones.

People sometimes shrug off opening mistakes of this kind by saying that it only costs a point or two. But if you lost 2 points on every move you would get crushed. I would not be surprised if the difference between this play and the play in the game is more than two points.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


For an alternative you might think of plays like this, to make it a bit easier to throw the tengen stone away. (Not that I recommend it, but it is better than the game play.)

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . 1 . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Or if you want to extend from the bottom left corner, extend on the bottom side, where you have potential to develop.

Edit: Unhidden.


I don't understand this, exactly. Isn't it big for white to approach on the left? It seems that he can complement his influence well this way.


First, it is not a lot of influence, because of the bad aji. Second, you have a tengen stone. Weak though it is, it hinders White's influence.

Second, you have stones, too. How will you make them work together?

Third, as has been mentioned, the breadth of the bottom side is greater than the breadth of the left side.

Let's compare combs:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=1, W=1
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O O X . X X O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O X X X . O O . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . O . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X . . . . . . O . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | X . X O . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . X O . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . B . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . 2 . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . 1 . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Suppose that Black plays on the bottom side and then White approaches from the left side. Play might continue this way. Indeed, :w2: and :w4: work well with :wc: . But look how well :b1: , :b3:, and :b5: work with :bc: !

But, you may say, :b3: and :b5: are not territory oriented.

Sorry, you are the one who played a stone on tengen.

But, you may say, it was necessary to reduce White's framework.

Indeed, it was, and it would have been better to reduce it earlier, with the move Magicwand and I suggested.

----

I was reading something today about getting better at tournament chess. It suggested studying a few openings deeply, because there is a lot of declarative knowledge to learn, and you should specialize. That also works in go, but to a much lesser extent. The battlefield is larger in go, and the scope of the plays is more limited. Your opponent has much more leeway in go. You cannot steer the game so much into familiar territory.

Even though he was giving three stones, Magicwand created a position where your best play was to reduce. It does not matter that your game plan called for making territory. You missed an early chance, but later made an attempt with the play at tengen. (Not as good as a deeper play, but a good idea.) Now that you have made that play, how do you make your plays work with it? It doesn't matter what your original game plan was, you should make a framework with it. Well, you did not make a framework with it. Now how do you throw it away? Your next play ignores that question, as you secure a corner. (Which you later lose, anyway.) In the end you live with the tengen stone, for 2.5 points (!), while giving up a strong wall.

The observer has to wonder, What is Black doing?

It is one thing to play for territory. But if that is all your early plays do, they are losing points. Take a look at some ancient games, say, early 19th century. Play was more territory oriented than now. They did not have the whole board vision that developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. But they didn't just make territory. It is instructive to see how much they appreciated influence. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


This post by Bill Spight was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #218 Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:04 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 80
Liked others: 14
Was liked: 1
Rank: 1d
GD Posts: 95
If you look quickly through the game you can see that magicwand dictated the pace of the game.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=0, W=0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . O . . X . O . . . . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

This move is pass. Instead b should jump out at m15 or cap at o13. These are moves that shows the spirit.
m15 - I want to divide and fight
o13 - I want GRANDE MOYO!

Several moves later b entered san-san at c17 - again the same! K4! D10!

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Prisoners: B=0, W=0
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . O . . X . O . . X . . |
$$ | . X . O . O . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . |
$$ | . . . . O . . . . X . . . O . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . O W . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


At this moment b has 6 disconnected groups! When white entered lower side the game was over. I'd say Kirby needs to read "breakthrough to shodan" before next game. You are lacking ideas to play at grand scale :) You should also play a lot more games as a white.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #219 Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:41 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 914
Liked others: 391
Was liked: 162
Rank: German 2 dan
Playing territorially means that when there are two equivalent choices, one chooses the one which gets more immediate cash. It does not mean to choose inferior options just because the others are not territorial enough.

_________________
A good system naturally covers all corner cases without further effort.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Magicwand vs. Kirby, part 3
Post #220 Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:49 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Kirby wrote:
daniel_the_smith wrote:
Kirby wrote:

I am going to keep my lead this game. Mark my words.


By pushing along the second line? O.o



Is there a better response to his attachment?


Maybe the descent? (Do a tewari.)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 226 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group