Monadology wrote:
I think you're confusing new discoveries with new conceptual capacities. If the conceptual capacity was never there, the discovery couldn't possibly happen.
If your point was, as jts has said, that we simply may not have discovered the technology/scientific principle that would allow us to know what to look for to find intelligent life, then I definitely agree. It's hard to tell though, because you're not just talking about technology. You're also talking about cultural shifts, and I really don't think our culture has much to do with it. Discovering radio waves and implementing them for communication would be sufficient to build a project to detect radio wave signals from other life. The presence of radio 'culture' involving music broadcasting, the development of soap operas, implementation of propaganda in the new medium etc... is not necessary in the least.
Actually, most fo that last post was aimed at the statement that I seemed to be claiming to know what the next paradigm shift would be/would be like.
I do think, however, that culture has a lot to do with what we look for. An early 1900s scientist might look for radio waves, with the assumption that the information would come in Amplitude Modulation, which is the simplest form of informational encoding on a radio wave. A late 1990s scientest would look for FM, PSK, and half a dozen other ways of implementing data encoding which may have sounded like random noise to earlier scientists, a change brought about by scientific advances made in the demands of a culture(More data on the same wave).
If you sent a message to Herz in the form of FM radio, he'd likely never hear it, and he had radio detectors.
You can know a signal is present without knowing what it means, certainly, but some of what we have discovered are ways to create a signal would have been beyond us without further refinement of data transmission. The culture drove that refinement.
Communication, particularly with intelligent beings who do not share our language, is hinged upon culture, the capability to find some culturual middle ground or nuetral space which allows the building blocks of communication to grow.
In short, my point is this: We likely lack the technology to detect any attempts to communicate with us, and lack a culture which could begin to relate to starfaring beings capable of communicating across the astronomical distances involved.
Even if tomorrow we found a signal in the aether from alien life, we'd lack the tools necessary to understand it, and might not even recognize it for actual communication because of our cultural and scientific lack.
Culture is an inescapable part of how we humans communicate. Our cultures, our global and scientific cultures, our culture of techology, limits and defines our search for extra terrestrial intelligence.