It is currently Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:15 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

What is your favorite chess?
Chess (Western/International) 45%  45%  [ 29 ]
Shogi (Japanese chess) 31%  31%  [ 20 ]
Xiangqi (Chinese chess) 8%  8%  [ 5 ]
Other... 5%  5%  [ 3 ]
None 12%  12%  [ 8 ]
Total votes : 65
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Western Chess, Xiangqi, or Shogi?
Post #41 Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:33 am 
Beginner

Posts: 8
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 2
Xiangqi seems like a good casual chess game. The perks of a slower pace and limited movement make it a nice alternative to western chess while still being familiar enough (no capture mechanic like in shogi). I can see why experienced strategy players would prefer the other games though. It does come off as a sort of reigned-in western chess, even with the off-the-wall piece that is the cannon.


Last edited by Deglet_Nour on Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #42 Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:38 am 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 7343
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 267
Was liked: 1646
GD Posts: 312
Quote:
Xiangqi seems like a good casual chess game. The perks of a slower pace and limited movement... to western chess...
Seems the other way around ? Each of the 16 xiangqi pieces is free to move from the start,
unlike in chess where 6 pieces (of one color) are blocked.

Wikipedia says xiangqi is slightly more complex.

Amateurs and pros may have different perspectives on the casualness. :)
moyoaji wrote:
moyoaji, how to type the chess characters ? :)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Western Chess, Xiangqi, or Shogi?
Post #43 Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:47 am 
Beginner

Posts: 8
Liked others: 1
Was liked: 2
I think the fact that Elephants can't cross rivers, Horse can't leap over pieces and the Advisors (and General) having such limited movement options make the game quite a bit slower and less brutal than western chess. But again, it may be me speaking as a beginner in both games.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re:
Post #44 Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:45 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 773
Location: Michigan, USA
Liked others: 143
Was liked: 216
Rank: KGS 1 kyu
Universal go server handle: moyoaji
EdLee wrote:
moyoaji, how to type the chess characters ? :)

Hello Ed! It's been a while.

I went to a unicode character site that lists them all and searched for "chess." http://unicode-table.com is an example. Then it's just copy and paste: ♕

Deglet_Nour wrote:
I think the fact that Elephants can't cross rivers, Horse can't leap over pieces and the Advisors (and General) having such limited movement options make the game quite a bit slower and less brutal than western chess. But again, it may be me speaking as a beginner in both games.

I've played some who are more experienced. It makes a world of difference. The game tends to be faster paced than Western chess once you know what you are doing. There isn't as much of a wind-up in the opening. Yes, pieces get positioned, but not to the extent that they do in Western chess. Without pawns in the way, pieces can quickly become powerful. The cannons can be surprisingly brutal if you aren't careful.

I'm surprised that Xiangqi would have a higher game complexity than Western chess, though, considering it has fewer pieces and the pieces do fewer things. Pawns can't promote to other pieces. Knights are more limited. As you said, there are pieces which cannot leave one half of the board. However, that really only increases the State-space Complexity, which is indeed higher for Western chess. The Xiangqi board is larger and it has some additional rules that make the stategy more involved (kings can never face across the board, for example).

Compared to go, however, all versions of chess are effectively the same. Go is so many orders of magnitude more complex that it only makes sense to compare it with chess games because those already are hard for us humans to wrap our heads around. From a distance, both look to be the same size, but chess is a big rock several meters away, while go is a mountain a kilometer off. And even those farthest up the mountain have hardly left its base...

_________________
"You have to walk before you can run. Black 1 was a walking move.
I blushed inwardly to recall the ignorant thoughts that had gone through
my mind before, when I had not realized the true worth of Black 1."

-Kageyama Toshiro on proper moves

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Re:
Post #45 Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:53 am 
Lives with ko
User avatar

Posts: 158
Liked others: 95
Was liked: 54
moyoaji wrote:
...

Compared to go, however, all versions of chess are effectively the same. Go is so many orders of magnitude more complex that it only makes sense to compare it with chess games because those already are hard for us humans to wrap our heads around. From a distance, both look to be the same size, but chess is a big rock several meters away, while go is a mountain a kilometer off. And even those farthest up the mountain have hardly left its base...


Heard this so many times. Should have gotten used to it by now, but I never seem to. "Go is so much better, for it is so much more complex etc" Oh please.


Attachments:
50K7tOV-500x336.jpg
50K7tOV-500x336.jpg [ 23.02 KiB | Viewed 315 times ]

This post by Anzu was liked by 2 people: Bill Spight, Deglet_Nour
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #46 Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:46 am 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 7343
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 267
Was liked: 1646
GD Posts: 312
Hi moyoaji, thanks.
moyoaji wrote:
I'm surprised that Xiangqi would have a higher game complexity than Western chess, though, considering it has fewer pieces
How do you mean ?
Both games have the same number of initial pieces per color: 16.
Chess has 6 different piece types, and xiangqi has 7. :)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Re:
Post #47 Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 1:19 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 773
Location: Michigan, USA
Liked others: 143
Was liked: 216
Rank: KGS 1 kyu
Universal go server handle: moyoaji
Anzu wrote:
Heard this so many times. Should have gotten used to it by now, but I never seem to. "Go is so much better, for it is so much more complex etc" Oh please.

I didn't say go was better, only that it is more complex, which is an objective fact. Being "better" is subjective. If, to you, more complexity is better, then you have drawn the conclusion yourself.

My use of metaphor to explain how much more complex go is does not imply that I am saying go is better. Plenty of people think mountain climbing is a frivolous pursuit not worth the risks. In that regard, perhaps I'm suggesting that go is a fool's errand? I'm not, but that interpretation makes just as much sense as yours.

Obviously, I really like chess, otherwise I wouldn't have bothered to start this thread 3 years ago. But I do acknowledge the fact, and it is a fact, that go is more complex. Do you argue that draughts (English checkers) isn't simpler than chess? To say it is simpler doesn't make it a bad game. Simplicity can be an admirable quality along with complexity. Neither is objectively better.

EdLee wrote:
Both games have the same number of initial pieces per color: 16.
Chess has 6 different piece types, and xiangqi has 7. :)

I forgot that the back row has 9 pieces in xiangqi. I counted the 7 front pieces in my head and then just added 8 for the back rank. I should have looked at a board, or given is a few more seconds of thought. Given there is a king and pawn in the center, there has to be an odd number of points across the board.
I remembered it has more piece types, but I'm not sure how much that helps with the game complexity, considering that the advisors are restricted to 5 points each. The elephants are each restricted to 7 points. The king to 9. Even a chess A or H pawn can be on up to 21 squares. The attacking pieces, especially the cannons and chariots, likely add the most to the game's complexity. That, and the larger board size.

_________________
"You have to walk before you can run. Black 1 was a walking move.
I blushed inwardly to recall the ignorant thoughts that had gone through
my mind before, when I had not realized the true worth of Black 1."

-Kageyama Toshiro on proper moves

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group