(;GM[1]FF[4]CA[UTF-8]AP[CGoban:3]ST[2]
RU[Japanese]SZ[19]KM[6.50]
PW[opponent]PB[me]DT[2013-07-14]RE[W+Resign]
;B[pd]
;W[dp]
;B[dc]
;W[qp]
;B[ce]
;W[qf]
(;B[nd]
;W[pj]
;B[op]C[My opponent informs me that this move is "really bad" and that I have fallen into the claws of the Kobayashi.]
;W[lp]
;B[qq]
(;W[rq]
;B[pq]
;W[ro]
;B[on]
;W[pm]
;B[mo]
;W[lo]
;B[mn]
;W[gq]C[I'm not unhappy with this result for B. His LR group is stable and he still has the opportunity to expand his side. If W takes the top instead, there is a big gap between D4 and M4.]
(;B[cn]
;W[cp]
;B[en]
;W[go]
(;B[jc]C[This is a great example of the principle "urgent moves before big moves". K17 is worth a lot of points, but now the game is all about W's attack on C7.]
;W[dm]
(;B[dn]C[This now seems way to heavy and confident about pulling the group out. I'm not sure what the best alternative is, though - it didn't occur to us that this was bad in review.]
;W[ck]C[W commented in review that he didn't like this move, but it seems plausible to me - good use of the forcing stone.]
;B[el]
;W[cm]
;B[bm]C[My idea was to provoke B8 and remove any requirement to connect around E7, but that didn't work.]
;W[bo]C[Now W actually manages to let B live independently with B7 without threatening any real attack on the C7 group.]
;B[bl]
;W[dk]
;B[bk]
;W[bn]
;B[ci]
;W[di]
;B[cj]
;W[dj]
;B[em]C[This is a pretty miserable move. It's so heavy. Alternative ideas: play C12 and let W have D6 if ihe wants; reduce lightly around L7. During the review, I looked into G6, but it's not promising.

The idea of E7 was that if I had no attack on D9, my entire way of playing up to here was ridiculous.]
;W[ch]
;B[bh]
;W[bg]
(;B[bi]
;W[dg]
;B[aj]
;W[hl]
;B[eh]
;W[dh]
;B[fk]
;W[fj]
;B[hk]C[This doesn't really work very well.]
;W[gk]
;B[gl]
;W[gj]
;B[hm]
;W[il]
;B[gm]
;W[im]
;B[ho]
(;W[in]C[Having read out the cut in the game and in the review and again now, I'm still not sure whether or not W can cut at h6.]
;B[hn]
;W[hp]
;B[io]
;W[kn]
;B[ep]
;W[eq]
;B[fp]
;W[fq]
(;B[jo]
(;W[kq]
;B[jn]
;W[km]
;B[jm]
;W[jl]
;B[kl]
;W[ij]
;B[kk]
;W[jj]
;B[iq]
;W[gp]C[This is the one move I'm not sure about.]
;B[lm]C[Now B has some tiny hope...]
;W[ip]
;B[ko]
;W[ln]
;B[jq]
;W[jp]
;B[kp]
;W[lq]
;B[kr]
;W[lr]
;B[jr]
;W[nq]
;B[nr]C[This is horrible. I has hallucinating a connection.]
;W[or]
;B[mr]
;W[mq]
;B[oq]
;W[ns]
;B[pr]
;W[ms]
;B[hr]
;W[gr]
;B[is]
;W[ks]
;B[nr]
;W[mr]
;B[np]
;W[hq]
;B[ps]
;W[ls])
(;W[kl]C[I was expecting something like this.]))
(;B[fo]C[In the game W thought this moe lived, but not quite.]
;W[fn]
;B[gn]
;W[gp]
;B[fm]
;W[do]))
(;W[hn]
;B[gn]
;W[in]
;B[ep]LB[fp:B][eq:A]))
(;B[cg]C[We didn't notice this in the game or the review. This makes a serious difference. If B doesn't need to live in gote he has many more options for dealing with E6.]
;W[dh]
;B[bi]
(;W[dg]
;B[hm]LB[cf:B][aj:A]C[A and B should be miai to live. (Playing B directly is big, but I don't think I have any attack on D10.)])
(;W[cf]
;B[dg]
(;W[df]
;B[eg]
;W[be]C[This way damages B's UL, but ruins W's attack.]
;B[dl]
;W[cl]
;B[eh])
(;W[bf]
;B[df]
;W[be]
;B[cd]C[Also better than the game.]))))
(;B[dj])
(;B[cl])
(;B[dl]))
(;B[dj]))
(;B[dj]C[An observer commented in review that D10 is better than C6. Obviously a white move around C7 is too narrow now.]))
(;W[pq]C[This move was discussed as better for W - it leads to complex sequences (which I don't know). On the whole, though, I'm happier with B's result after W12@s2.]))
(;B[nc]LB[ic:B][oq:A]C[I quickly regretted Black 7. It seems to me that I now have sente to approach around A, which is then the largest point on the board (B being uninteresting). ]))