(;GM[1]FF[4]SZ[19]AP[SmartGo Kifu:3.4]CA[UTF-8]GN[oca - JI]PW[oca]WR[16k+]PB[JI]BR[16k+]DT[2014/08/20]KM[6.5]RE[W+6.5]RU[Japanese];B[pp];W[dd];B[dp];W[pd];B[nc]
;W[pf]L[qf][jd]C[A and B was other options...];B[pb];W[qc]
;B[qb]C[was excpeting A]L[kc]
(;W[rc]
;B[rb]C[this one looks very slow];W[qj]L[lb][lc]C[also consdered A or B but prefered R10];B[sc];W[sd];B[sb]
;W[re]C[very over consentrated... but what else....];B[pc]L[pd];W[od];B[oc]
;W[qn]L[dj][jd]C[seems to be a good time to tenuki
I think R6 is nice... but is it *THE* point we both absolutly want... maybe A or B are just bigger];B[qp]
;W[nq]L[fq][dj][jd][cn]C[I wish I played something else...
I wanted to start developping something in the bottom but A is better I think... or still B or C or even D that would work better with my top hoshi

so this one was a mistake I think...];B[np]
;W[oq]C[but as we are here... let's try to do something with that...];B[op]
;W[lq]C[mavbe push one more time at A first...but I'm not sure]L[mq]
(;B[mp]C[if I was blackI think I would use my wall and attack at A]L[ql]
(;W[kp]L[on];B[mq];W[mr];B[pq]
;W[fq]C[I like this one];B[or];W[nr];B[pr]
;W[cn]C[I don't know thesedouble approach joseki  very well but let's try as I didn't answered my first approach move];B[ns]
;W[lr]C[needed];B[eo]
;W[cq]C[let's try...]L[go];B[dq];W[cp];B[co];W[bo];B[do];W[dr];B[er];W[cr]
;B[eq]TR[dr][fq]SQ[er][eq]C[broken shape];W[fr]
;B[ds]SQ[eq][er]TR[dr][fr][fq]C[even worse broken shape];W[cs];B[es]
;W[hp]C[I think this one is good];B[fp];W[gp];B[go]
;W[dl]L[dk]C[that looks good to me or even at A];B[gr];W[gq];B[fs];W[hr];B[gs]
;W[ho]C[may be that one just helped black...];B[gn]
;W[ln]C[prepare connection to the right]TR[kp][qn][qj][ho];B[cm]C[dont excpeted that... but that a good one I think
here I don't know what to reply...]
(;W[dm]C[tried that but that seems not fantastic...];B[bn];W[bp];B[dn];W[di];B[ar]
(;W[br];B[aq]
;W[ap]C[so bad... self reducing my space....];B[as]C[I'm dead -> tenuki
(and very very close to resign...)];W[cl];B[bl];W[bk];B[am];W[cj]
;B[an]C[why ?];W[jd]C[not sure this one was so good as black can really now invade at the 3-3 point so may be a small extension at "A" would have been better here ...]L[fc];B[ic];W[lc];B[jc];W[me];B[kc];W[ld];B[kd]
;W[mb]L[ke]C[is this sente... I'm not sure... if not that would be a very bad move... as black can play A now...]
(;B[nb];W[na];B[oa]
;W[fc]L[ke]C[or A ?... not sure, I prefer F17];B[ma]C[why ? playing at "A" would be better I think...]L[ke];W[ke]
;B[id]L[la]C[or separate at A ?]
(;W[je];B[lb];W[hf];B[mc];W[md];B[nd];W[ne]
;B[qg]C[hello invader...];W[pg]C[first hit on the head...];B[qh]
(;W[oi]TR[pg][oi][qj]C[I liked that shape];B[qf];W[qe];B[qi]
;W[pi]C[I think that's fine so far];B[rj]
(;W[qk]C[should I try the double hane here instead ?];B[rf]C[that would be a weak six if black can play 
at A]L[sf];W[sf]C[so let's try to force him to a bulky five];B[sg];W[rk]
;B[se]C[this stone is really important here...]TR[sd][ms];W[rd]
;B[sj]C[ok bulky five... that's dead if I play well...];W[rh];B[sh]
(;W[sf]
;B[ri]TR[rh]C[OMG... I was sure that the marked stone was enougth to kill that group... what a mistake here... it's alive now...];W[sk]
;B[ok]C[ok... I just failed to kill that bulky five, let's try to kill this one...];W[mj]
(;B[om];W[on]
(;B[nn];W[pn];B[pj];W[nm];B[nl];W[mm];B[mn];W[pl];B[ol];W[pk]
;B[oj];W[ml];B[lo];W[kn];B[ko];W[jo];B[lp];W[jq];B[oo];W[nj]
;B[ce];W[cd];B[de];W[ee];B[bd];W[bc];B[ad];W[ef];B[df];W[dg]
;B[bf];W[cg];B[bg];W[cf];B[be];W[bh];B[ed]
(;W[ag];B[cc];W[dc];B[cb];W[bb];B[db];W[ec];B[ba];W[eb];B[ab]
;W[gl];B[hn];W[in];B[em];W[el];B[fm];W[gm];B[hm]
(;W[il];B[fl];W[fk];B[hl];W[gk];B[hk];W[hi];B[hj];W[jj];B[gj]
;W[fj];B[gi];W[fh];B[gh];W[hh];B[gg];W[gf];B[hg];W[ig];B[fg]
;W[eh];B[eg];W[ff];B[ie];W[ij];B[if]
;W[gb]C[try to live...]TR[cd][dd][ec][eb][fc][ee][ef][ff][gf][hf];B[ih];W[ii];B[jg];W[jh];B[ig];W[kg];B[hb];W[gc];B[ga];W[fa]
;B[ha];W[da];B[ac];W[im];B[ro];W[rn];B[sn];W[sm];B[so];W[fi]
;B[qo];W[hs];B[gd];W[fd];B[ge]
;W[fe]C[important... now it's alive...];B[kh];W[lh];B[ji];W[ki];B[jh];W[lj];B[kf];W[le];B[lg];W[mg]
;B[se];W[lf];B[kg];W[ph];B[hc];W[af];B[he];W[ms];B[os];W[ak]
;B[al];W[ik];B[po];W[pm];B[sf];W[ah];B[ca];W[ea];B[ae];W[ch]
;B[];W[]
;B[]TW[fb][ed][qd][oe][of][og][oh][pe][mf][nf][ng][nh][ni][dh][mh][mi]
[ai][bi][ci][ei][ej][ek][li][aj][bj][dj][dk][kj][kk][kl][km][oj]
[ok][ol][om][pj][ck][jk][jl][jm][jn][lk][ll][lm][mk][nk][nl][ql]
[rl][sl][qm][rm][io][ip][iq][ir][is][jp][hq][kq][kr][ks][jr][js]
[ls]TB[aa][ia][ja][ka][la][na][pa][qa][ra][sa][bb][bc][ib][jb][kb][mb]
[ob][hd][rg][rh][si][bm][cn][en][fn][ao][bo][ap][bp][fo][mo][no]
[cp][cq][cr][cs][ep][rp][sp][rq][sq][rr][sr][rs][ss][bq][br][bs]
[qq][qr][qs][dr][ps])
(;W[ik];B[fl];W[fk]
(;B[hl];W[gk];B[hk];W[hj];B[il];W[jk];B[jl];W[kl])
(;B[im];W[jm];B[hl];W[gk];B[hk];W[hj];B[ek];W[ck];B[gj];W[fj]
(;B[gi])
(;B[ij];W[gi];B[jk]))))
(;W[dc];B[ec];W[eb];B[fd];W[db]
(;B[gc];W[fb];B[gd];W[ac];B[ah];W[bi])
(;B[fb];W[gc];B[gb];W[gd])))
(;B[pn]C[And now... what ...];W[po]
;B[oo]TR[on][po]))
(;B[pj]C[I'm not sure what would happended in that case... so let's try...]
(;W[pk];B[oj];W[ol]
(;B[nl]
;W[nk]MA[oj][ok][pj])
(;B[mk]
;W[nk]MA[oj][ok][pj])
(;B[nk]
(;W[ml];B[nl];W[nm];B[mk];W[lk]
;B[mm]TR[ml];W[ll]
;B[om]TR[ol][nm]C[oups...])
(;W[mm];B[nl];W[om];B[nm];W[nn];B[on];W[pn];B[pl];W[pm];B[ql]
;W[rl]MA[pl][ql];B[ni];W[nj];B[oh];W[ph];B[ml]
;W[ll]MA[nm][nl][nk][ok][oj][pj][ml]C[ok that's the good one...])
(;W[ll];B[nl];W[om];B[nm];W[nn];B[pl];W[ql];B[pm];W[on];B[pn]
;W[po]MA[pl][pm][pn])))
(;W[oj]
;B[ql]TR[qj][qk][rk][sk];W[pl];B[pk];W[rl];B[qm];W[rm];B[pm];W[ol];B[nk];W[om];B[pn]
;W[ml]TR[nk][ok][pk][pj];B[rn];W[qo]
;B[sm]MA[rm][rl][rk][qk][qj][sk]C[oups...])))
(;W[ri]))
(;W[rk]
;B[qk]TR[qj][rk];W[pj]
;B[rl]C[no... the double hane don't work here...]))
(;W[ph]C[or just extends... no I prefer my orignal 110 in that case.];B[qi];W[pi];B[pj];W[qk];B[oj]))
(;W[la]
(;B[mc];W[lb]
;B[je]C[maybe separation is better, this black group has still no eyes...])
(;B[je]C[maybe separation is better, this black group has still no eyes...]SQ[kd][kc][jc][ic][id][je])))
(;B[ke]TR[jd][ld]SQ[kd][ke][kc]C[let's check what happen in that case...];W[oa]TR[nc][oc][pc][pb][qb][rb][sb][sc]C[try to kill, if I can, that's worth the bad shape I think... I see three option for black]
(;B[pa];W[ra];B[nb]
;W[na]MA[nb][nc][oc][pc][pb][pa][qb][rb][sb][sc]C[that looks dead to me in this case...])
(;B[ra];W[pa];B[nb]
;W[na]C[that looks dead in that case too...]MA[nb][nc][oc][pc][pb][qb][rb][ra][sb][sc])
(;B[nb];W[na];B[pa]
;W[ra]C[and dead too... so finally 92 was sente I think... now that doesn't mean it was good...]MA[nb][nc][oc][pc][pb][pa][qb][rb][sb][sc])))
(;W[ao];B[aq];W[br];B[as]))
(;W[dn]C[maybe that's better... I think that would lead to the following...]TR[cm][co]SQ[cn][dn]
(;B[bn]
(;W[bm];B[bp];W[an];B[bq];W[br]
;B[ar]MA[cp][cq][br][cr][cs][dr]C[oups...])
(;W[bp];B[bm]
;W[tt]C[if white tenuki];B[ar]C[if 72 tenuki, that would lead to something very close to what I did in main variation...]))
(;B[bp]
(;W[bn];B[bq];W[br]
;B[ar]C[oups, that don't work for me...]MA[cp][cq][cr][cs][dr][br])
(;W[bq]
;B[bn]TR[cn][dn];W[ap];B[dm];W[en]
;B[em]C[not good for me...])))
(;W[bn]
(;B[dn];W[dm])
(;B[dm]TR[cn][dl]SQ[cm][dm]C[bas shape];W[al];B[bm];W[am];B[bl];W[bk];B[ck]
;W[bj]C[not good for me])))
(;W[on]C[looks like a nice boxing move but...];B[mq];W[mr];B[nr]
(;W[lr];B[or])
(;W[or];B[lr];W[ns];B[kq])))
(;B[ql]C[not sure what I would reply here...];W[om]C[I suppose this...];B[pm];W[pn]
;B[on]C[seems to be lot's of possibilities here...]))
(;W[kc];B[rc];W[rd];B[qh]
;W[qk]C[maybe that's playable, but I dont like that...]))