(;GM[1]FF[4]CA[UTF-8]AP[CGoban:3]ST[2] RU[Japanese]SZ[19]KM[6.50]TM[60] GN[BWStone-mathmo(B) IGS]PW[BWStone]PB[mathmo]WR[5d]BR[5d]DT[2017-12-22]CP[ Copyright (c) PANDANET Inc. 2017 Permission to reproduce this game is given, provided proper credit is given. No warrantee, implied or explicit, is understood. Use of this game is an understanding and agreement of this notice. ]EV[Internet Go Server game: BWStone vs mathmo]PC[IGS: igs.joyjoy.net 6969]US[Brought to you by IGS PANDANET]C[ mathmo 5d : Hi! ]RE[B+Resign]LT[]NB[33]NW[33]RR[Normal] ;B[pd]BL[53] ;W[dc]WL[59] ;B[pp]BL[50] ;W[dp]WL[48] ;B[ce]BL[42] ;W[ee]WL[41] ;B[cq]BL[37] ;W[cp]WL[16] ;B[dq]BL[34] ;W[eq]WL[15] ;B[er]BL[31] ;W[fq]WL[14] ;B[fr]BL[29] ;W[gq]WL[14] ;B[cj]BL[3]C[slightly daring for me, but I remembered define 3.0's game against zen. it is probably very reasonable here as C15 as corner access] ;W[cl]WL[519] ;B[cc]BL[599] (;W[cf]WL[465] (;B[dd]BL[433] ;W[ed]WL[460] ;B[ec]BL[431] (;W[be]WL[457] ;B[fc]BL[419] ;W[db]WL[447] ;B[cb]BL[415] ;W[de]WL[440] ;B[cd]BL[413] ;W[dg]WL[438]C[locally B is clearly good and the position of C10 is not bad] ;B[ej]BL[408] ;W[ge]WL[429] ;B[el]BL[331] ;W[bp]WL[338] ;B[gr]BL[328] ;W[hq]WL[336] ;B[bq]BL[325] ;W[qn]WL[325] ;B[nq]BL[287] (;W[rp]WL[323] ;B[hd]BL[241]C[I don't normally like to play side moves before corner moves post-alphago, but the L&D of this W group seemed in question to me] ;W[nc]WL[243] (;B[bg]BL[126] ;W[bf]WL[212] ;B[ch]BL[119]C[focused on eyespace as I couldn't decide whether to pincer or defend, but probably premature] ;W[pc]WL[132] ;B[qc]BL[115] ;W[qb]WL[131]C[submissive!] ;B[qd]BL[93] ;W[ob]WL[129] (;B[qh]BL[86]C[slightly difficult to choose where, but followed extend 3 space from 2 stone wall rule of thumb] ;W[qq]WL[64] ;B[kq]BL[82] ;W[or]WL[55] ;B[eo]BL[56] (;W[ep]WL[53] ;B[qk]BL[45] ;W[oq]WL[47]C[locally W is clearly bad here] ;B[np]BL[38] ;W[op]WL[46]C[I remember always being scared of W doing this, but my in game tewari made me realise it is nothing to be unhappy about. I'm glad my in-game research is still teaching me things.] (;B[lc]BL[30]C[so just take side points] ;W[ne]WL[40] ;B[bm]BL[23] (;W[cm]WL[31] ;B[bl]BL[20] ;W[bn]WL[30] ;B[ck]BL[16] ;W[am]WL[598] ;B[bk]BL[590] ;W[no]WL[572] ;B[mo]BL[586] ;W[mn]WL[563]C[bad direction, pushing B towards W's weak group] ;B[nn]BL[575] ;W[oo]WL[561] ;B[ln]BL[554]C[not wanting to be pressed against W's wall. I never used to play this sort of crude move, but this is very much influenced by bot study] ;W[mm]WL[559] ;B[lo]BL[547] ;W[lm]WL[556] ;B[km]BL[545] ;W[kl]WL[552] ;B[jl]BL[542] ;W[jm]WL[531] ;B[kn]BL[539] (;W[im]WL[529]C[what????] ;B[io]BL[519] ;W[hn]WL[492] ;B[ho]BL[509] ;W[fn]WL[463] ;B[go]BL[470] ;W[gn]WL[418] ;B[fo]BL[467] ;W[en]WL[417] ;B[do]BL[463] ;W[dn]WL[416] ;B[co]BL[456] ;W[cn]WL[415] ;B[jk]BL[453] ;W[lk]WL[408] (;B[hk]BL[429]C[ambitious, initially I had planned to just live at J2, and frankly didn't have enough reading to back this move up, though from post-game analysis, it does seem difficult for W now] (;W[jq]WL[405] ;B[jp]BL[424] ;W[ip]WL[400] ;B[jr]BL[419] ;W[ir]WL[394] ;B[iq]BL[417] ;W[hl]WL[357] ;B[gk]BL[392] ;W[jq]WL[355] ;B[bo]BL[389] ;W[ao]WL[352] ;B[iq]BL[387] ;W[ik]WL[352] ;B[ij]BL[384] ;W[jq]WL[351] ;B[aq]BL[382] ;W[ap]WL[349] ;B[iq]BL[380] ;W[dr]WL[600] ;B[cr]BL[598] ;W[jq]WL[599] ;B[kk]BL[596] ;W[ll]WL[578] ;B[iq]BL[594] (;W[kj]WL[578] ;B[jj]BL[579] ;W[jq]WL[577] ;B[kr]BL[501] ;W[jo]WL[528] ;B[iq]BL[497] ;W[hp]WL[527] ;B[jn]BL[494] ;W[jq]WL[526] ;B[ko]BL[491] ;OS[Koma2][Water7745][Yetlu][abiichi][baian][javadesk][zeetee]) (;W[jj] (;B[kj] ;W[jq] ;B[kr] ;W[jo] ;B[iq] ;W[hj]) (;B[hp]C[no choice obviously B still very happy] ;W[kj] (;B[he]C[this W group is also in danger]) (;B[if]C[actually, I think this is more severe in this case])))) (;W[jp] ;B[jq] ;W[ip] ;B[jn] ;W[iq] ;B[ir] ;W[hr] ;B[jr] ;W[is] ;B[bo] ;W[ao] ;B[aq] ;W[ap] ;B[js] ;W[hs] ;B[nr]C[is B alive?] ;W[kp] ;B[lp] ;W[lr] ;B[lq] ;W[mr] ;B[ns] ;W[mq] ;B[mp] (;W[ls] ;B[ms]C[B seems alive]) (;W[ms] ;B[ls])) (;W[hr] ;B[jr] (;W[jp] ;B[ip]) (;W[mr] ;B[mq]))) (;B[ir]C[this was still proper? I hadn't really read it properly])) (;W[kk])) (;W[qf]C[this is severe and I hadn't yet decided on my response. my post game analysis said that B can fight strongly here. I learn't something here] ;B[pf]C[this seems the only move that might lead to a result that isn't very submissive.] ;W[pg] ;B[qg] ;W[pe] ;B[of] ;W[oe] ;B[qe] ;W[rf] ;B[og]C[after the game, I wondered if this was reasonable] ;W[re] ;B[rb] (;W[rd] ;B[qa] (;W[rc] ;B[pb] ;W[oc] ;B[sb] ;W[od] ;B[qb] ;W[sc] ;B[rg]) (;W[pb] ;B[rc] ;W[od] ;B[rg])) (;W[ra] ;B[rd] ;W[sd] ;B[sc] ;W[sf]C[this is a slow ko, but surely B is not scared yet]))) (;AE[pp][rp]C[W's inefficiency is pretty terrible and the Q4 for S4 is hardly a bad exchange])) (;W[em]C[I was worried about this] ;B[fm] ;W[dm] ;B[fn] ;W[ep] ;B[gk])) (;B[pg]C[post-alphago I like this two space high shape much less than I used to (unless for special reason such as reducing enemy moyo)])) (;B[oc]C[still proper to continue to play around here] ;W[nd] ;B[pf] ;W[jc]C[I was concerned that my shape was bad here] ;B[he]C[but I guess it's not so bad as W can't get both the H14 hane comfortably and H18 too])) (;W[gc]C[pretty huge but gote] ;B[gb] ;W[hb]C[bad exchange for B] ;B[gd]C[hmm, somehow I didn't notice that this was powerful] ;W[hc] ;B[fd] ;W[hd] ;B[fe])) (;W[db]C[this was what I was most afraid of, but I thought B was probably ok] ;B[fc] ;W[cb] ;B[bf] ;W[bg] ;B[cd])) (;B[de]C[strongly considered this, but didn't think it worked])) (;W[dd] ;B[cd]C[obviously B is happy to settle efficiently, but is there really anything W can do about it?]))