It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:05 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Attack & defense by Ishida and Davies reviewed with KataGo 1
Post #1 Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 5:53 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2411
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Here's an analysis of the first full board diagram discussion in Ishida & Davies' "Attack and Defense"



This post by Knotwilg was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Attack & defense by Ishida and Davies reviewed with Kata
Post #2 Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 10:18 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 211
Liked others: 16
Was liked: 62
Rank: KGS 1k EGF 2k
KGS: Schachus12
what komi did you use for katago/ what komi does this game have? I`m surprised black is supposed to be clearly ahead (unless it`s 0 komi then it doesnt surprise me).


This post by Schachus was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Attack & defense by Ishida and Davies reviewed with Kata
Post #3 Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2020 10:44 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2411
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 359
Was liked: 1019
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Schachus wrote:
what komi did you use for katago/ what komi does this game have? I`m surprised black is supposed to be clearly ahead (unless it`s 0 komi then it doesnt surprise me).


Me too I was surprised ... I used a 6,5 point komi.

To test whether my version of KataGo takes it into account, I changed komi to 0,5 ... and KataGo gives Black a 14 pt advantage. If it were strictly additive it should give 12 points but this shows it takes komi into account.

Edit: I also made two other changes to test the evaluation

1) I moved White's lower left 3-3 stone to 4-4. That seems to reduce Black's advantage from 6 to 4,5 (with error margins)
2) I replaced the upper left with (what used to be) the standard line of the large avalanche outward turn. That further reduces the advantage to 3,5. See below



Maybe having solid influence towards the opponent's lone corner is giving an advantage, if we compare both assessments.

As this wasn't the theme of this post I won't further investigate this now but if someone has a view on which effects compound into such a big lead early on, I'm also interested.


This post by Knotwilg was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group