So the goal is to play more? It's strange for me if one plays in group with 20 players and wins each of them one time and will have 38 pts (2pt x 19 players). Whereas another loses to all player twice and will have the same 38 pts(1pt x 19players x 2time). And if we assume that we have 4 "losers ...
it's a strategy when player will play at least 2 (or more) games with all players in the group and loose all the games and he/she will be in the top of the list.
so is such state ok for all or does anybody feel some inconvenience due to you need to play more games (amount instead of quality) to go ...