Search found 27 matches
- Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:34 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
As I mentioned earlier, I feel like this move is really big for both white and black, so I am going to take. I feel like I still have a lead in this game, so I am not going to try anything drastic. I'll probably try counting the score in the next few turns, but I am currently feeling kind of lazy ...
- Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:31 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
He will protect the cut, and then I will play E8 like I've been wanting to. I don't think he can afford to leave the cut.
$$Wcm43 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 X O ...
$$Wcm43 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 X O ...
- Mon Apr 09, 2012 8:01 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
still not much to say
$$Wcm41 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X . |
$$ | . X O ...
$$Wcm41 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X . |
$$ | . X O ...
- Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:21 pm
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
$$Wcm39 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X . |
$$ | . X O ...
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X . |
$$ | . X O ...
- Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:40 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
Not much to say here.
$$Wcm37 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X . |
$$ | . 2 O ...
$$Wcm37 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . X O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X . |
$$ | . 2 O ...
- Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:52 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
So, I don't think this move requires to much explanation, but I want to go over my last move.
$$Wcm35 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . c ...
$$Wcm35 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . c ...
- Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:17 pm
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
This is my move, I will add explanation tomorrow.
$$Wcm33 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . O ...
$$Wcm33 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . O ...
- Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:08 pm
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
Sur wrote:I really enjoy watching this game.
Thanks for watching!
- Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:29 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
I obviously have to respond here, my options were to connect or to capture white's stone. I've decided just to go for the connection so he doesn't get the follow up atari.
Now he has to protect his cut since it seems to work how I have read it. The net doesn't work and the neither does the ladder ...
Now he has to protect his cut since it seems to work how I have read it. The net doesn't work and the neither does the ladder ...
- Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:48 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
$$Wcm29 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X ...
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . O . . . O . X . X ...
- Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:37 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
Instinct says keep groups separated. Plus now it looks like white has 2 week groups
$$Wcm27 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X ...
$$Wcm27 Captures: black - 0, white - 0.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X ...
- Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:58 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
Perhaps I am missing something but this move seems odd to me. This seems to passive by white and I think his remaining shape isn't very good. Obvious move for me is to capture the cutting stone. I am thinking this is how things will play out. And I am pretty happy with this result.
$$Wcm25 ...
$$Wcm25 ...
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:38 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
To be honest, I haven't really read this out that much but it seems like this cut is playable and I think it will be more interesting than simply letting white build a nice wall.
$$Wcm23 Captures: black - 0, white - 0 ...
$$Wcm23 Captures: black - 0, white - 0 ...
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:54 am
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
Sorry for the long delay. I was on break and I had very limited computer access. But I am back now and will be able to play regularly again.
$$Wcm21 Captures: black - 0, white - 0 ...
$$Wcm21 Captures: black - 0, white - 0 ...
- Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:58 pm
- Forum: 1-on-1 Malkovich games
- Topic: #159 - opex vs Nome
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49553
Re: #159 - opex vs Nome
Probably be a bit slow in my posts for the next two weeks, this one is a busy week at school and then I am on Spring break so I don't know how often I'll be on my computer.
I've never seen anything played other than jumping here so that's what I'll do. Let's see how white wants to play from here ...
I've never seen anything played other than jumping here so that's what I'll do. Let's see how white wants to play from here ...