Thanks! It just a bit confusing cause later in the book at other examples the author uses "white/black is alive in seki".
I think the topic can be closed now. Thanks again for the replies.
Search found 3 matches
- Sat Nov 25, 2017 3:05 am
- Forum: Go Book Reviews
- Topic: James Davies - life and death - question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17074
- Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:53 am
- Forum: Go Book Reviews
- Topic: James Davies - life and death - question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17074
Re: James Davies - life and death - question
Thanks for the answer. Then it is just an error in the book? Cause at the end of the explaination of Dia 4 the authos says "white is alive", and not "white is alive in seki".
- Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:00 am
- Forum: Go Book Reviews
- Topic: James Davies - life and death - question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17074
James Davies - life and death - question
Greetings,
I have a question about one of the diagrams from the book of James Davies - Life and Death.
Dia4 on the pic below. Why is why alive? Doesnt white need to capture the 3 black stones inside in order to try to make 2 eyes - meaning capturing 3 stones is a dead shape?
Or black must first ...
I have a question about one of the diagrams from the book of James Davies - Life and Death.
Dia4 on the pic below. Why is why alive? Doesnt white need to capture the 3 black stones inside in order to try to make 2 eyes - meaning capturing 3 stones is a dead shape?
Or black must first ...