Life In 19x19

Don't rush your argument stalkor. Especially the vitamin example works against you xD
If you take all the vitamines on day 1, you'll overload your system with vitamines, or rather, they won't be able to take them all in. This is actually a better example for me to give, as I think playing too many ...

It's hard to disagree with you with you ez4u, as you make a very good argument. So rather than disagreeing, I agree with the fact that the current structure might indeed benefit from the change you are suggesting. I do however firmly protest any further decline in quality of the games. I still ...

Oeh, I just read about the prizes and I like the idea of giving prizes to certain ranks that placed highest.
I'd like to give a teaching game to anyone that is 1 dan or weaker and placed the highest.

If more people do this, maybe it should be so that you can't win more than two of these prizes ...

I guess the change will have to come slowly, so to not upset everyone, but maybe if now option two is going to be applied and people like the fact that there is a smaller max games the month after we could drop it a notch again.
I will just vote for whatever option has the lowest amount of maxgames ...

I would always choose for the option that has the least amount of total games per person per month.

So 18 persons in a class with 2 games a month per match up makes 17 x 2 games = 34
3 x 13 = 39 games, so that's barely an improvement, but yes, I'd support that change.

I don't see why you want ...

I hate how you say:

Even though 45 games a month sounds a lot, in reality, very few of the players are currently playing over 30. Stats for Dec are as follows:


The max amount of games that can be played should in my opinion be something that is possible to achieve. I've never liked the current ...

Sign me up, MrZNF [4d] (when the tournament starts I'm hoping to finally be steady 5d though, kgs is not allowing me to become 5d...)

i like the 3 games rule, cause ceteris paribus more is better:)
For one thing is sure: reducing the number of possible games will result in lesser games given the current circumstances.
Of course on the other hand there maybe people who don't participate in the league cause their time constraints ...

I voted change A, but I'm fine with change B also. I feel that you are right about the amount of junk games being played. I've played against a couple of weaker people that didn't seem to really care about the game and just wanted to get it over with (for the points I suspected). So yeah, I agree on ...

Anything involving pro's is a + in my book. So I voted for those two options