I'm at a point were I've noticed aspects of cultural differences very different in quality to what most pay attention, such as the preponderance of objective subjective versus objectives subjective in a culture and the like. Good stuff, and the best part is that it ironically makes mindless stereotyping difficult since they operate on dynamic bell curves rather than the statics ones where use too that easily cause controversy. In other words, the theory is it's own safety check against misuse since fundamentally the more you misuse is the less it looks like the theory one which glorifies individual elements rather than combined units. Of course there are a few that that I can't bring myself Western amateurs would often use such words as 'punishing' a 'wrong' play and 'defending' against some 'attack', and those words seem to be used in the east too, but not quite to replaced.

If atsumi and atsusa were different types of thick pizza crust, although I generally prefer thin and don't get too worried about that, then what I'm talking about because tomatoes must defend against feta cheese when japanese pros what kind of defence the tomato must put up to what kind of attack the feta chees is making and they're not overly concerned about that anyway, since they're more focus on the attitude the feta brings to the attack and whether it's supported by a framework of supporting flavours that determine the success of the attack before i's even begun.

Perhaps European and then western culture tends to focus moreso on the tangible elements of a thing, compared an eastern philosophy of paying equal heed to the space or surrounding elements around it, and it's expressed here in this surrounding game of ours

'Adji' in the language of the ethnic group I'm half-a-part of means 'seed'