It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:50 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: 3-4, high approach and pincers
Post #1 Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:59 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 218
Liked others: 23
Was liked: 14
Rank: IGS 3k
KGS: Bki
IGS: mlbki
I'm currently going through Invincible, and as such I am seeing a lot the Shusaku 1-3-5.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Shusaku fuseki
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White approach immediately, because otherwise :

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c White take the last corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . |
$$ | . . 4 , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


If white take the last corner, black enclose, and if white approach to prevent black from making two shimari, give black the perfect pincer-extension of :b7:.

The modern pattern, though, if I'm not mistaken, would be this :

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c :w2: and :w4: may be 4-4 or anything in the corners.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . |
$$ | . . 4 , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


A pincer doubling as an extension is still a very good double purpose move. You don't want to give it to your opponent unless you get something big in exchange. So, the implication is that neither a nor b are good as pincers. They are still extension, so the explanation is that they must allow white to get a superior result in the corner. Black can pincer further, of course, but then it can't really be called an extension anymore.

So why are the 3 space pincers inferior when white make a high approach?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 3-4, high approach and pincers
Post #2 Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 10:31 am 
Oza

Posts: 2494
Location: DC
Liked others: 157
Was liked: 442
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
The high stone, being high, is lighter and can move into the center more easily to escape pressure. 3 space pincers are in general played for balance with the other corner as well, but they still need to have an effect on the fighting in the corner to be a proper pincer. If white plays the outside attachment, for example...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . 3 , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1 X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


White has the ladder, so he can cut on whichever side he prefers. The marked black stone hasn't really had an effect on this fight, so it's more single purpose. It's also a tad bit farther from the shimari in the upper right than would be considered ideal.

As for the low move:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . B . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ {LN Q3 R9}[/go]


You'll notice that the white stone lies outside the line between the black stones, so they're not threatening to enclose it, and with the pincer so far away, white isn't really constrained in his action. I've played :w1: above as an example, but it looks easy for white to handle, and black's pincer feels a bit misplaced.

One other thing to consider is that black does have a chinese formation in each case after the pincer, but he's a move behind. As a tewari analysis, if black had played a normal chinese opening, low or high, he wouldn't then take :b7: to make a small extension in the upper right corner. He would follow up by attacking the white stone, looking to build the top and bottom as well as something on the right.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 3-4, high approach and pincers
Post #3 Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 10:47 am 
Oza

Posts: 3655
Liked others: 20
Was liked: 4630
Quote:
The high stone, being high, is lighter


As a fuseki concept, seems like a complete non sequitur to me.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 3-4, high approach and pincers
Post #4 Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:11 pm 
Oza

Posts: 2494
Location: DC
Liked others: 157
Was liked: 442
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
John Fairbairn wrote:
Quote:
The high stone, being high, is lighter


As a fuseki concept, seems like a complete non sequitur to me.


My perception is that it's easier for white to play and ignore than it is for white to do the same with the low approach. I don't mean that white can never approach low and tenuki. Do you disagree?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 3-4, high approach and pincers
Post #5 Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:24 pm 
Judan

Posts: 6725
Location: Cambridge, UK
Liked others: 436
Was liked: 3719
Rank: UK 4 dan
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Something to think about, compare these two:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c White take the last corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . |
$$ | . . 4 , . . . . . , . . . . 8 , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c White take the last corner
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . |
$$ | . . 4 , . . . . . , . . . 8 . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


P.S. This is not really a beginner question.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #6 Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 3:10 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Quote:
The high stone, being high, is lighter

My perception is that it's easier for white to play and ignore...
A high stone can be extremely heavy.
A low move can be very light.

The value and importance of a stone or group depend on the global,
whole board context, not the simplistic distance from the edge.

The height is independent of the weight.
Some years ago, a 2k friend, whenever a beginner asked him what's the difference
between a 3rd-line stone vs. a 4th-line stone, would reply it's a good but difficult question,
how about play a few hundred games first. :) Which I find a good answer.

These days, my companion illustration, especially for people who know about Ishida or Takao,
is that it's about 100 pages difference between the 3-4 and 4-4 josekis.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 3-4, high approach and pincers
Post #7 Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 8:27 pm 
Oza

Posts: 2356
Location: Ireland
Liked others: 662
Was liked: 442
Universal go server handle: Boidhre
Also bear in mind those are no komi games. I've seen the low approach discouraged in the modern form and that pincer being mentioned, but equally I've seen some discussion about white taking the last corner becoming popular/trendy after komi was introduced.

I'm not strong enough to comment on this but my speculation is the lack of komi is important to consider here when studying your first diagram.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group