It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:37 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

Is the move only illegal because it replicates the previous board state?
Poll ended at Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:34 am
Yes 100%  100%  [ 7 ]
No 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
I don't know and I just like to answer polls for no reason 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 7
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Clarification
Post #1 Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 11:34 am 
Beginner

Posts: 2
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 0
Rank: newb
In the attached image I have a scenario where very similar moves are illegal. I'm pretty sure the ONLY reason the move on the right had side is illegal is the no previous board position rule, however I want to make sure I'm not missing anything about the mechanics. Is there any other reason this move is disallowed?


Attachments:
Go-question.png
Go-question.png [ 504.03 KiB | Viewed 6416 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Clarification
Post #2 Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 11:52 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 866
Liked others: 318
Was liked: 345
Without context, I have no idea why you'd claim the second position is illegal. Looks legal to me.

_________________
- Brady
Want to see videos of low-dan mistakes and what to learn from them? Brady's Blunders

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #3 Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:23 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Could you also post the entire SGF up to that point ?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Clarification
Post #4 Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:37 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 660
Liked others: 25
Was liked: 124
Rank: Miserable 4k
KGS: STOP STALKING ME
wineandgolover wrote:
Without context, I have no idea why you'd claim the second position is illegal. Looks legal to me.


It's obviously a ko


This post by Abyssinica was liked by: xed_over
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Clarification
Post #5 Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 2:41 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 418
Liked others: 9
Was liked: 83
Rank: kgs 5 kyu
KGS: Pio2001
Hi,
I don't see the move of the first diagram. The cross is on the S11 stone, but the R12 stone looks like it was just captured.

Except that playing S11 doesn't capture R12 !

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Clarification
Post #6 Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:11 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 660
Liked others: 25
Was liked: 124
Rank: Miserable 4k
KGS: STOP STALKING ME
The first diagram on the left is black to play as indicated by the shadowy black stone. The second image is white attempting to retake this ko as indicated by the shadowy white stone.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Clarification
Post #7 Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2015 6:47 pm 
Beginner

Posts: 2
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 0
Rank: newb
Pio2001 wrote:
Hi,
I don't see the move of the first diagram. The cross is on the S11 stone, but the R12 stone looks like it was just captured.

Except that playing S11 doesn't capture R12 !


S11 was the last move before that one (no capture)

The diagram depicts black to play about to capture Q12.

The second diagram depicts that move having been played and Q12 now gone. White is to play and I was attempting to place at Q12 to capture R12. I wanted to make sure the reason was ko and not some other rule I don't understand.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Clarification
Post #8 Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:04 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 866
Liked others: 318
Was liked: 345
Ok, I misunderstood your order of moves. I think I understand now. This is a common situation called a ko, as explained here. Hope it helps!

_________________
- Brady
Want to see videos of low-dan mistakes and what to learn from them? Brady's Blunders

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Clarification
Post #9 Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:10 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 418
Liked others: 9
Was liked: 83
Rank: kgs 5 kyu
KGS: Pio2001
Aaaaah, ok, I understand now.

Yes the move is forbidden because it is a ko. According to the rules used, the formulation is a bit different.

Japanese & korean rules : two stones that recapture each other alternatively is called a ko. It is forbidden to recapture in a ko.
Chinese, AGA, NZ, French : it is forbidden to create a repetition during the game (repetition of position in the chinese rule, repetition of position + player to play in the AGA rule, repetition of position by the same player in the french rule).

The british rule forbids both to recapture a ko and to recreate a position already created by oneself.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group