It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:50 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #1 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:52 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 133
Location: UK
Liked others: 163
Was liked: 24
KGS: 4kyu
As a 16kyu, I obviously play a lot of handicap games, and I also open on the 4-4 points as white.

Sensei's library says that the best time for white to invade the 3-3 point is 1 move before black would defend against it, but I can't seem to figure out when black should defend against it! I know how to defend against it, I just don't know how big it is and when I should take a move out and do it.

Most of my opponents invade the 3-3 too early, but I have had a couple of games where we were deep into the endgame and the I had the 3-3 invaded. Surely I should be defending against it before I start playing hane-block-connect on the first line. Is it about the same size as a monkey jump?

If this question is too general I can try to post some positions.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #2 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:14 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2011
Location: Groningen, NL
Liked others: 202
Was liked: 1087
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
You should defend against the 3-3 invasion one move before your opponent would invade. :)

3-3 is not an endgame move, so it cannot be compared with the monkey jump. If an opponent invades in the endgame, it is probably unreasonable. If it isn't, one of you should have played it long before the endgame.

So really, there is no easy answer. You'll just have to figure out, in every new middle game, whether the 3-3 is currently the right move to play or defend against.


This post by HermanHiddema was liked by: Ortho
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #3 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:21 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2644
Liked others: 304
Was liked: 631
Rank: kgs 6k
It's quite different from a monkey jump.

If black makes a monkey-jump into white's territory, he has poked out about 5 of white's points and probably gained 2 1/2 points of his own. And he normally ends in sente, so we double the total. That's big, and fairly easy to calculate.

If white makes a 3-3 invasion under black's 4-4 stone, he has taken about 14 points that black had some control over, and prevented them from becoming black's territory; he has gained maybe points of territory for white; and he has given black a thick wall facing the center. So in order to judge how much it's worth, you both need to judge how much black's thick wall is worth, and how likely black was to turn those 14 corner intersections into territory. At the beginning of the game, black might get half of those points by enclosing the territory, so we might say white has scraped off 7 black points; but on an empty board black's wall will be worth as much as three points per stone, or 18 points. So white has actually lost points with the early invasion. On the other hand, at the end of the game if black (or white) already has a large group near the corner, this wall will be nearly worthless, but perhaps all of the territory would have become black's after another move defending corner. That makes it worth 24 points or so to invade (and then double that, remember, because W keeps sente).

So what are the two differences between invasions and reductions (for example, between the 3-3 invasion and monkey jumps)? First, in an invasion you make points inside your opponent's potential territory; the more likely this was to be his territory if he had added another move, the more valuable it is. Second, in an invasion your opponent can thickly seal in your stones, and you need to subtract the value of this thickness from the value of your invasion. On an empty board this is worth a lot (and worth even more if he has an extension a long way away), but on a crowded board it will be worthless.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #4 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:29 pm 
Lives with ko
User avatar

Posts: 269
Location: Seattle
Liked others: 127
Was liked: 123
Rank: AGA 12k
GD Posts: 292
KGS: RedBeard
DGS: Akahige
Look for The Big Move. It is time to defend against the 3-3 invasion when you have sente and it is the biggest move on the board. How do you know when the 3-3 is The Big Move? That's where reading and judgment come in. :tmbup:


This post by Redbeard was liked by 2 people: Ortho, xed_over
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #5 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:53 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 133
Location: UK
Liked others: 163
Was liked: 24
KGS: 4kyu
Thanks for these replies!

I knew I should defend it 1 move before white invades! :)

From the point estimates there, I can see how this can be a somewhat delicate decision, but I can improve immediately by just defending it much sooner. I've had a couple of games recently where I've already built a big black wall that is now rather useless for whatever reason and lost 3 of the 4 corners in the endgame, because I've just never defended against it.

Thanks!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #6 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:02 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
As others have said, there is no easy answer. If you find yourself making smallish moves and your 4-4 is lonely, consider it. If there is an urgent move (e.g. life & death) somewhere, then don't.

Just food for thought, depending on what is happening on the rest of the board, this 3-3 can be quite nice:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c This is a label for the diagram.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


This post by judicata was liked by: Ortho
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #7 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:53 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
The first pro game that I kibitzed was between two 9 dans, Takagawa and Yamabe. At one point Yamabe appeared to be in agony. He sighed, he moaned, he said, "I've lost." He grabbed his head, he swayed back and forth. Finally, after several minutes of this, he invaded on the 3-3. ;)

It's not necessarily an easy choice for pros, either. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


This post by Bill Spight was liked by: Ortho
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #8 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:05 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2644
Liked others: 304
Was liked: 631
Rank: kgs 6k
Not to disagree with judicata - that's certainly a big move... but:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c This is a label for the diagram.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . 6 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . W 2 4 5 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 0 3 X . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . 1 . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


...it's not as though this is bad for black. In fact, this is great for black. This, on the other hand, is supposedly a little cramped:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W This is a label for the diagram.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W 9 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 2 . B . . . Y . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 3 X . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . 5 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 7 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . Y , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


So "block the corner when you have a double wing formation" is good advice, but not quite so urgent as "block the corner when you have a low double wing formation".


This post by jts was liked by: Ortho
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #9 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:40 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 932
Location: New York, NY
Liked others: 146
Was liked: 150
Rank: KGS 1k
Universal go server handle: judicata
jts wrote:
Not to disagree with judicata - that's certainly a big move... but:



Yeah, but let's look at the alternative. What does black look like when white invades the formation AFTER black plays the 3-3. :) Of course, as I said, it depends on what is going on elsewhere on the board. Your second diagram is cramped because you shouldn't be making a low double-wing in the first place (insert normal caveats); you probably won't have time to play the 3-3, as a white stone will already be there :).

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #10 Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:46 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 133
Location: UK
Liked others: 163
Was liked: 24
KGS: 4kyu
This is the kind of position I am talking about. I want this to be black territory. Black seems way ahead. White's area looks big but black has a lot more. The walls are already built. Obviously, the 3-3 invasions in the corners are only going to favour white.

Is this a good spot to defend the 3-3 invasions or should it be even earlier?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Position at move 83
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . X X . . . . X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X O O X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . X X O . O X . . X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X O . O . O X X O . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O O . . . . O O O O X . X . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . O O X . O . . . O . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . O X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O O O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . O . X O X . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . X O . . . . O X X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X O . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #11 Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 8:05 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1758
Liked others: 378
Was liked: 375
Rank: 4d
3 of the four 3-3 invasions shouldn't work at all:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W \nThese sequences are only suggestions, black can kill in other ways as well.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . 5 7 6 . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . 6 . |
$$ | 8 . 1 . X . X X . . . . X . . . 1 . . |
$$ | 9 3 2 X . X O O X X . . . . . X 3 2 . |
$$ | . 4 . . X X O . O X . . X X . . . 4 . |
$$ | . . X O X O . O . O X X O . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O O . . . . O O O O X . X . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . O O X . O . . . O . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . O X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O O O X . . 8 . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . O . X O X . X 7 6 . |
$$ | . . . . X O . . . . O X X X . 3 1 . . |
$$ | . . . X O . . . . . O . . . 4 2 5 . . |
$$ | . . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

So I wouldn't defend these. However, for argument's sake, let's say they work, or let's say black wants to play it safe since he is far ahead of white by this point. Then, black should have defended a while ago. This is because if white invades and lives, black gets zero compensation for it. Whenever you're in a situation where you will get no compensation in influence on the outside if your opponent invades your 3-3, defending against the invasion becomes urgent.

In this particular game, I'm worried most about the bottom-left corner, as it has the worst aji.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Position at move 83
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . X X . . . . X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X O O X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . X X O . O X . . X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X O . O . O X X O . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O O . . . . O O O O X . X . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . O O X . O . . . O . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . O X X . . |
$$ | . 5 . . . . . . . . . O O O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . O . X O X . X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 2 X O . . . . O X X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . 3 X O . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Therefore, I would defend this straight away:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Position at move 83
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . X X . . . . X . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . X O O X X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . X X O . O X . . X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O X O . O . O X X O . X . . . . |
$$ | . . X X O O . . . . O O O O X . X . . |
$$ | . O O O . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . . |
$$ | . O O X . O . . . O . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . . . . . . O X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . O O O X . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . O . . . O . X O X . X . . . |
$$ | . . 3 . X O . . . . O X X X . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X O 2 . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 1 O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

:b3: is really passive, but it's probably worth it to ensure black holds on to his lead in this game.

_________________
We don't know who we are; we don't know where we are.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.


This post by Dusk Eagle was liked by 2 people: daal, Ortho
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #12 Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:11 am 
Lives in sente

Posts: 706
Liked others: 252
Was liked: 251
GD Posts: 846
Dusk Eagle wrote:
These sequences are only suggestions, black can kill in other ways as well.


Yes, but they are a bit above 16kyu I'd say. :D

This is one of those general things. The ability to use strong positions to kill invaders or really to do anything interesting at all is something that increases with playing strength and experience. The 4-2 point responses in a couple of your examples are severe, but require the external stones to support them.

There is a kind of teaching game (see Biggest Corner in Senseis) where one side has a thick corner area other side tries to invade. For example:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . X .
$$ | . . 3 2 8 . . . X .
$$ | . . 1 7 . . . . X .
$$ | . 5 . , . . . . X ,
$$ | . 4 6 . . . . . X .
$$ | . . . . . . . . X .
$$ | . . . . . . . . X .
$$ | . . . . . . . . X .
$$ | X X X X X X X X X .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . ,[/go]


This is a good game to play with a stonger player. A kyu player can even play this with a pro because the difficulty can be adjusted. The weaker player can play either black or white. Play once with an 8x8 square. If white lives three times in a row, move the black stones in until black can kill. If white dies three times in a row, move the black stones out until white can live. (Like changing a handicap.) With this game, it is possible to develop a better eye for the kinds of sequences Dusk Eagle shows.

I'm also concerned that in the game, it looks like black made the Butterfly shape:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I'm not sure if this shape existed earlier in the game, but if it did, white can invade at :w1: and live. If that is the case, then "defending earlier" for the OP might just mean making a better shape earlier...


This post by snorri was liked by: Ortho
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #13 Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:17 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 133
Location: UK
Liked others: 163
Was liked: 24
KGS: 4kyu
Thanks for these replies. I was really surprised that all those invasions should die! I sort of played out the 3-3 joseki by rote in each corner, figuring my extra move would help me kill the shape when it was finished off, but it didn't. :-? I don't really know the sequences to kill those, but I assume it's a matter of learning to read better than memorizing it, so I'll keep working on that Not playing the "butterfly shape" is something that I have learned as well.

I'm going to ask a couple of the strong players at my club to play that invasion game with me for a while, as that looks exactly like what I want to learn. Thanks very much for the help! :clap:

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: When to defend against the 3-3 Invasion?
Post #14 Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:57 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1758
Liked others: 378
Was liked: 375
Rank: 4d
P.S. Don't go getting the idea to play the shape below everywhere - it's normally very bad for black if white pushes through at 'a'. In my examples, it works because of the huge black walls directly behind it.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 1 a X . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Ortho wrote:
I don't really know the sequences to kill those, but I assume it's a matter of learning to read better than memorizing it,
You're right. I didn't have the sequences on the right memorized or anything, it was just reading and intuition. As you play more games your reading will become stronger.

_________________
We don't know who we are; we don't know where we are.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group