It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 3:13 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #1 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:40 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 379
Liked others: 105
Was liked: 123
Kong Jie won the Fujitsu Cup, beating Lee Sedol by 12.5 points. Wow! More info and game record here - http://justplaygo.com/

_________________
"This is a game that rewards patience and balance. You must think like a man of action and act like a man of thought."
-Jonas Skarssen

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #2 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:49 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2777
Location: Seattle, WA
Liked others: 251
Was liked: 549
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
I don't know about demolishing but here is the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #3 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:07 pm 
Gosei

Posts: 1627
Liked others: 543
Was liked: 450
Rank: senior player
GD Posts: 1000
I guess a lot of people think Black has a big lead after move 13 so this game is a good example of how to handle a loose moyo when you have some solid territory.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #4 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:27 pm 
Gosei

Posts: 1387
Liked others: 139
Was liked: 111
GD Posts: 209
KGS: Marcus316
Black's opening is interesting. I'm now experimenting with this pseudo Kobayashi/Micro Chinese fusion kind of thing in my own games ... lots of fun.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #5 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:31 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 1435
Location: California
Liked others: 53
Was liked: 171
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
Yes, I noticed. :-)

_________________
KGS 4 kyu - Game Archive - Keyboard Otaku

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #6 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:32 pm 
Gosei

Posts: 1387
Liked others: 139
Was liked: 111
GD Posts: 209
KGS: Marcus316
fwiffo wrote:
Yes, I noticed. :-)


Your current move has me brain-tied. You'll have to wait for my next move, it might take a while.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #7 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:54 pm 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 5539
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 1103
Was liked: 1456
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it.

_________________
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #8 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:10 pm 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2777
Location: Seattle, WA
Liked others: 251
Was liked: 549
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it.


It's becoming fairly common. I have a book from Japan that covers it for a little bit. The idea is fairly similar to the low Chinese.

http://senseis.xmp.net/?MicroChinese

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #9 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:14 pm 
Lives with ko
User avatar

Posts: 180
Liked others: 6
Was liked: 4
I don't know about demolishing either, but it was an interesting game. Lee sedol will remember this. ahahahahah

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #10 Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:35 am 
Oza

Posts: 3656
Liked others: 20
Was liked: 4631
Quote:
Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it.


It is discussed extensively in New In Go, items 68, 70 amd 71.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Kong Jie demolishes Lee Sedol
Post #11 Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:31 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Anybody know the theory behind move #7? It is one point to the right of where I am used to seeing it.


[sgf-full](;SZ[19]FF[3]
PW[Honinbo Doetsu]
PB[Yasui Sanchi]
EV[Castle Game]
DT[1649-03-29 (Keian 2 II 17)]
PC[Edo Castle]
KM[0]
RE[B+11 {moves beyond 170 not known}]
US[GoGoD95]
;B[cp];W[qd];B[dc];W[pq];B[fq];W[ce];B[ch];W[hq];B[fo];W[lc];B[ic];W[hd]
;B[hc];W[fd];B[fc];W[od];B[ed];W[ee];B[gd];W[ff];B[ge];W[ei];B[ck];W[qn]
;B[lq];W[kp];B[lp];W[kn];B[ln];W[lo];B[mo];W[ko];B[oq];W[pp];B[mn];W[kq]
;B[or];W[pr];B[on];W[co];B[do];W[cn];B[bp];W[dn];B[dg];W[cc];B[ef];W[df]
;B[eg];W[fe];B[cb];W[fg];B[ek];W[eo];B[dp];W[fn];B[fh];W[gh];B[gi];W[fi]
;B[eh];W[hg];B[hh];W[gg];B[cf];W[dd];B[ec];W[de];B[bf];W[ci];B[bi];W[di]
;B[gj];W[bj];B[bh];W[fp];B[ep];W[go];B[gp];W[hp];B[fo];W[en];B[qm];W[rm]
;B[rl];W[pm];B[ql];W[pn];B[qi];W[oo];B[no];W[op];B[np];W[mr];B[lr];W[ns]
;B[ll];W[bb];B[bc];W[bd];B[cd];W[cj];B[bk];W[cc];B[qf];W[ac];B[fj];W[fp]
;B[pc];W[qc];B[mc];W[md];B[lb];W[kb];B[kc];W[ld];B[jb];W[mb];B[ka];W[nc]
;B[pe];W[pd];B[pl];W[fr];B[er];W[gq];B[eq];W[rn];B[nq];W[os];B[om];W[pg]
;B[qg];W[ph];B[pi];W[nh];B[oi];W[pf];B[qe];W[oe];B[oh];W[ng];B[rd];W[rc]
;B[re];W[qh];B[rh];W[rg];B[sg];W[ni];B[nj];W[mj];B[mk];W[lj];B[je];W[kf]
;B[ke];W[ii];B[jf];W[jg];B[lf];W[kg];B[le];W[kl];B[kk];W[lk];B[ml];W[lm]
;B[mm];W[km]
)[/sgf-full]

I don't know about theory, but the practice is hoary. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group