I evaluate the following carpenter's square as a local endgame on the marked locale. I apply the modern endgame theory explained in [14].
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Carpenter's Square
$$------------------
$$. . . C C C C C C|
$$. . X . X W C C C|
$$. . . . X W C C C|
$$. . . . X W W W C|
$$. . . . X X X X C|
$$. . . . . . . . .|
$$. . . . . . . X .|
$$. . . . . . . . .|[/go]
For Black's start, I presume this sequence:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Black's Sequence
$$------------------
$$. . . . . 4 9 a b|
$$. . X . X O 3 1 2|
$$. . . . X O . 8 6|
$$. . . . X O O O 5|
$$. . . . X X X X 7|
$$. . . . . . . . .|
$$. . . . . . . X .|
$$. . . . . . . . .|[/go]
Furthermore, I assume this sequence and the studied variations to be dominating. Further study should verify this. If a different ko variation should be dominating, the values might have to be corrected slightly. White starts on the 2-2, of course.
The most important conclusions are as follows:
Initial position:
Count = 4 2/3
Move value = 11 2/3
Type = gote
Length of sequence worth playing successively = 1
In practice, it can often be correct to play the first five moves successively because their gains are at least 10 2/3 and therefore similar to the initial move value. The gains of the 6th and especially 7th moves are much smaller though: 5 2/3 and 1 2/3.
Moves with move value 9 2/3 (as in the created ko):
Moves 8 to 11.
In particular, it would be a mistake to derive the wrong initial values from the sente follower after move 10 as the count 2 2/3 and move value 9 2/3, as done in the book Yose Size List.
Black's alternating sequence
Code:
after move count move gain move value type length of successive sequence(s)
0 4 2/3 1 11 2/3 11 2/3 gote 1
1 16 1/3 2 10 2/3 5 2/3 gote 5
2 5 2/3 3 10 2/3 10 2/3 gote 3
3 16 1/3 4 11 11/12 5 2/3 gote 3
4 4 5/12 5 11 11/12 7 11/12 gote 1
5 16 1/3 6 5 2/3 5 2/3 gote 1
6 10 2/3 7 1 2/3 1 2/3 sente Black's 5 White's 4
7 12 1/3 8 9 2/3 9 2/3 sente 4
8 2 2/3 9 9 2/3 9 2/3 gote 3
9 12 1/3 10 9 2/3 9 2/3 sente 2
10 2 2/3 11 9 2/3 9 2/3 ko Black's 2 White's 1
11 12 1/3 9 2/3 ko Black's 1 White's 2
Copy and save the following SGF file, best viewed with GoWrite:
(;SZ[19]CA[UTF-8]GM[1]FF[4]ST[2]AP[GOWrite:3.0.10]AB[mb][oe][ob][pe][qe][re][oc][od][rg]PM[2]FG[259:]C[Each just stated value is a count.
The locale is marked.
M is the move value of the currently studied hypothesis and position.
Gb1, Gb2,... are the gains of move 1, 2,... of Black's alternating sequence of the currently studied hypothesis and position.
Gw1, Gw2,... are the gains of move 1, 2,... of White's alternating sequence of the currently studied hypothesis and position.
So far, we assume, but do not verify, that Black's alternating sequence and its variations shown are dominating.
Refuted Hypotheses
Black's 7/9/11-move sequence
gote move value M = (12 1/3 - (-7)) / 2 = (19 1/3) / 2 = 9 2/3
M > Gb6
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
Refuted Hypotheses
Black's 8/10-move sequence
sente move value M = 2 2/3 - (-7) = 9 2/3
M > Gb6
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
Refuted Hypothesis
Black's 6-move sequence
sente move value M = 10 2/3 - (-7) = 17 2/3
M > Gb6
17 2/3 > 1 2/3
Refuted Hypotheses
Black's 3/5-move sequence
gote move value M = (16 1/3 - (-7)) / 2 = (23 1/3) / 2 = 11 2/3
M > Gb2
11 2/3 > 10 2/3
Refuted Hypothesis
Black's 4-move sequence
sente move value M = 4 5/12 - (-7) = 11 5/12
M > Gb2
11 5/12 > 10 2/3
Refuted Hypothesis
Black's 2-move sequence
sente move value M = 5 2/3 - (-7) = 12 2/3
M > Gb2
12 2/3 > 10 2/3
Confirmed Hypothesis
gote count = (16 1/3 + (-7)) / 2 = (9 1/3) / 2 = 4 2/3
gote move value M = (16 1/3 - (-7)) / 2 = (23 1/3) / 2 = 11 2/3
Gb1 = 11 2/3
Gw1 = 11 2/3
M <= Gb1
11 2/3 <= 11 2/3
M <= Gw1
11 2/3 <= 11 2/3
]PW[ ]SQ[rd][sd][se][na][oa][pa][qa][ra][sa][pb][qb][rb][sb][pc][qc][rc][sc][pd][qd]AW[rd][pc][pb][pd][qd]PB[ ]GN[ ]
(
;B[rb]
;FG[259:]C[16 1/3
position after move 1
refuted hypotheses
White's 6/8/10-move sequence
sente move value M = 9 2/3
M > Gw6
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
White's 7/9-move sequence
gote move value M = (22 - 2 2/3) / 2 = 9 2/3
M > Gw6
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
confirmed hypothesis
White's 5-move sequence
gote count = (22 + 10 2/3) / 2 = (32 2/3) / 2 = 16 1/3
gote move value M = (22 - 10 2/3) / 2 = (11 1/3) / 2 = 5 2/3
Gb1 = 5 2/3
Gw1 = 10 2/3
M <= Gb1
5 2/3 <= 5 2/3
M <= Gw1, Gw2, Gw3, Gw4, Gw5
5 2/3 <= 10 2/3, 10 2/3, 11 11/12, 11 11/12, 5 2/3]PM[2]
(
;W[sb]
;FG[259:]C[5 2/3
position after move 2
refuted hypotheses
Black's 5/7/9-move sequence and White's 1/3-move sequence
gote move value M = (12 1/3 - (-5)) / 2 = (17 1/3) / 2 = 8 2/3
M > Gb5
8 2/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 5/7/9-move sequence and White's 2-move sequence
sente move value M = 12 1/3 - 0 = 12 1/3
M > Gb5
12 1/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 6/8-move sequence and White's 1/3-move sequence
sente move value M = 2 2/3 - (-5) = 7 2/3
M > Gb5
7 2/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 4-move sequence and White's 1/3-move sequence
sente move value M = 10 2/3 - (-5) = 15 2/3
M > Gb4
15 2/3 > 5 2/3
refuted hypothesis
Black's 1/3-move sequence and White's 3-move sequence
gote move value M = (16 1/3 - (-5)) / 2 = (21 1/3) / 2 = 10 2/3
M > Gw3
10 2/3 > 5
refuted hypothesis
Black's 3-move sequence and White's 2-move sequence
sente move value M = 16 1/3 - 0 = 16 1/3
M > Gw2
16 1/3 > 5
confirmed hypothesis
Black's 3-move sequence and White's 1-move sequence
gote count = (16 1/3 + (-5)) / 2 = (11 1/3) / 2 = 5 2/3
gote move value M = (16 1/3 - (-5)) / 2 = (21 1/3) / 2 = 10 2/3
Gb1 = 10 2/3
Gw1 = 10 2/3
M <= Gb1, Gb2, Gb3
10 2/3 <= 10 2/3, 11 11/12, 11 11/12
M <= Gw1
10 2/3 <= 10 2/3]PM[2]
(
;B[qb]
;FG[259:]C[16 1/3
position after move 3
refuted hypotheses
White's 4/6/8-move sequence
sente move value M = 22 - 12 1/3 = 9 2/3
M > Gw4
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
White's 5/7-move sequence
gote move value M = (22 - 2 2/3) / 2 = (19 1/3) / 2 = 9 2/3
M > Gw4
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
confirmed hypothesis
White's 3-move sequence
gote count = (22 + 10 2/3) / 2 = (32 2/3) / 2 = 16 1/3
gote move value M = (22 - 10 2/3) / 2 = (11 1/3) / 2 = 5 2/3
Gb1 = 5 2/3
Gw1 = 16 1/3 - 4 5/12 = 11 11/12
M <= Gb1
5 2/3 <= 5 2/3
M <= Gw1, Gw2, Gw3
5 2/3 <= 11 11/12, 11 11/12, 5 2/3]PM[2]
(
;C[ ]W[pa]
;FG[259:]C[4 5/12
position after move 4
refuted hypotheses
Black's 3/5/7-move sequence and White's 4/2-move sequence
sente move value M = 12 1/3 - 0 = 12 1/3
M > Gb2
12 1/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 3/5/7-move sequence and White's 3-move sequence
gote move value M = (12 1/3 - (-5)) / 2 = (17 1/3) / 2 = 8 2/3
M > Gb2
8 2/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 3/5/7-move sequence and White's 1-move sequence
gote move value M = (12 1/3 - (-3 1/2)) / 2 = (15 5/6) / 2 = 7 11/12
M > Gb2
7 11/12 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 6/4-move sequence and White's 3-move sequence
sente move value M = 2 2/3 - (-5) = 7 2/3
M > Gb2
7 2/3 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 6/4-move sequence and White's 1-move sequence
sente move value M = 2 2/3 - (-3 1/2) = 6 1/6
M > Gb2
6 1/6 > 1 2/3
refuted hypothesis
Black's 2-move sequence and White's 3-move sequence
sente move value M = 10 1/2 - (-5) = 15 1/2
M > Gb2
15 1/2 > 1 2/3
refuted hypothesis
Black's 2-move sequence and White's 1-move sequence
gote move value M = 10 1/2 - (-3 1/2) = 14
M > Gb2
14 > 1 2/3
refuted hypotheses
Black's 1-move sequence and White's 4/2-move sequence
sente move value M = 12 1/3 - 0 = 12 1/3
M > Gw2
12 1/3 > 3 1/2
refuted hypothesis
Black's 1-move sequence and White's 3-move sequence
gote move value M = (12 1/3 - (-5)) / 2 = (17 1/3) / 2 = 8 2/3
M > Gw2
8 2/3 > 3 1/2
confirmed hypothesis
Black's 1-move sequence and White's 1-move sequence
gote count = (12 1/3 + (-3 1/2)) / 2 = (8 5/6) / 2 = 4 5/12
gote move value M = (12 1/3 - (-3 1/2)) / 2 = (15 5/6) / 2 = 7 11/12
Gb1 = 7 11/12
Gw1 = 7 11/12
M <= Gb1
7 11/12 <= 7 11/12
M <= Gw1
7 11/12 <= 7 11/12
]PM[2]
(
;B[sd]
;FG[259:]C[16 1/3
position after move 5
Hypothesis 1
White's long sente with White's 6-move sequence
sente count = 12 1/3
sente move value M = 22 - 12 1/3 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 1 2/3
refuting Hypothesis 1\:
M > Gw1
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
Hypothesis 2
White's long gote with White's 5-move sequence
gote count = (22 + 2 2/3) / 2 = (24 2/3) / 2 = 12 1/3
gote move value M = (22 - 2 2/3) / 2 = (19 1/3) / 2 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 1 2/3
refuting Hypothesis 2\:
M > Gw1
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
Hypothesis 3
White's long sente with White's 4-move sequence
sente count = 12 1/3
sente move value M = 22 - 12 1/3 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 1 2/3
refuting Hypothesis 3\:
M > Gw1
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
Hypothesis 4
White's long gote with White's 3-move sequence
gote count = (22 + 2 2/3) / 2 = (24 2/3) / 2 = 12 1/3
gote move value M = (22 - 2 2/3) / 2 = (19 1/3) / 2 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 1 2/3
refuting Hypothesis 4\:
M > Gw1
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
Hypothesis 5
White's local sente with White's 2-move sequence
sente count = 12 1/3
sente move value M = 22 - 12 1/3 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 1 2/3
refuting Hypothesis 5\:
M > Gw1
9 2/3 > 1 2/3
Hypothesis 6
White's local gote with White's 1-move sequence
gote count = (22 + 10 2/3) / 2 = (32 2/3) / 2 = 16 1/3
gote move value M = (22 - 10 2/3) / 2 = (11 1/3) / 2 = 5 2/3
Gb1 = 5 2/3
Gw1 = 5 2/3
confirming Hypothesis 6\:
M <= Gb1
5 2/3 <= 5 2/3
M <= Gw1
5 2/3 <= 5 2/3]PM[2]
(
;W[sc]
;FG[259:]C[position after move 6
Hypothesis 1
White's long sente with Black's 5-move sequence and White's 4-move sequence
sente count = 10 2/3
sente move value M = 12 1/3 - 10 2/3 = 1 2/3
Gb1 = 1 2/3
Gw1 = 9 2/3
confirming Hypothesis 1\:
M <= Gb1, Gb2, Gb3, Gb4, Gb5
1 2/3 <= 1 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3
M <= Gw1, Gw2, Gw3, Gw4
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3]PM[2]
(
;B[se]
;FG[259:]C[position after move 7
Hypothesis 1
White's long sente
sente count = 12 1/3
sente move value M = 22 - 12 1/3 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 9 2/3
confirming Hypothesis 1\:
M <= Gb1
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3
M <= Gw1, Gw2, Gw3, Gw4
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3]PM[2]
(
;W[rc]
;FG[259:]C[position after move 8
Hypothesis 1
Black's long gote
gote count = (12 1/3 + (-7)) / 2 = (5 1/3) / 2 = 2 2/3
gote move value M = (12 1/3 - (-7)) / 2 = (19 1/3) / 2 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 9 2/3
confirming Hypothesis 1\:
M <= Gb1, Gb2, Gb3
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3
M <= Gw1
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3]PM[2]
(
;B[qa]
;FG[259:]C[position after move 9
Hypothesis 1
White's local sente
sente count = 12 1/3
sente move value M = 22 - 12 1/3 = 9 2/3
Gb1 = 9 2/3
Gw1 = 9 2/3
confirming Hypothesis 1\:
M <= Gb1
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3
M <= Gw1, Gw2
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3, 9 2/3]PM[2]
(
;W[ra]
;FG[259:]C[position after move 10
ordinary ko
move value
(22 - (-7)) / 3 = 29/3 = 9 2/3
count
-7 + 1 * 9 2/3 = 2 2/3]PM[2]
(
;B[sa]
;FG[259:]PM[2]MN[1]C[position after move 11
ordinary ko
move value
(22 - (-7)) / 3 = 29/3 = 9 2/3
count
22 - 1 * 9 2/3 = 12 1/3]
(
;W[ra];B[tt];C[-7]W[qc]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2];B[ra]C[22]
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[sa];W[tt];B[ra]C[22]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2];C[-7]W[qc]
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[ra]C[22]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2];C[2 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gw2 = 9 2/3]
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[qa]C[12 1/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gb2 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gb3 = 9 2/3]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2];C[-7]W[ra]
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[rc]C[22]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2];C[2 2/3]W[rc]
;B[qa]C[12 1/3
Gw2 = 9 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gw3 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gw4 = 9 2/3]
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[se]C[12 1/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gb2 = 9 2/3]W[rc]
;B[qa]C[12 1/3
Gb3 = 9 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gb4 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gb5 = 9 2/3]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2]
;C[Hypothesis 1
Black's long gote
gote count = (10 2/3 + (-8 2/3)) / 2 = 2/2 = 1
gote move value M = (10 2/3 - (-8 2/3)) / 2 = (19 1/3) / 2 = 9 2/3
Gb2 = 11 1/3
Gw2 = 9 2/3
confirming Hypothesis 1\:
M <= Gb2, Gb3, Gb4
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3, 9 2/3, 9 2/3
M <= Gw2
9 2/3 <= 9 2/3]W[ra]
(
;B[qa]C[10 2/3
Gw2 = 9 2/3]
;C[best because W avoids approach ko
2 2/3 + (-1 2/3) = 1
Gw3 = 9 2/3]W[rc]
;B[sa]C[10 2/3
Gw4 = 9 2/3
After dissolution of the ko, the count of the remaining endgame with W's privilege on the right side, with a locale temporarily expanded by one intersection, is\: -2/3
Shrinking the expanded locale means modifying the count by -1.
Accounted for the initial locale, the the remaining endgame has the adjusted count -1 2/3.
In the initial locale, the count is 12 1/3.
In the initial locale, the total count including the remaining local endgame is 12 1/3 + (-1 2/3) = 10 2/3.]
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[2]PM[2]
;C[simply speaking, this is the best move
-7 + (-1 2/3) = -8 2/3]W[rc]
)
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[sc]C[22]
)
(
;FG[259:]C[2 2/3
Gw3 = 9 2/3]PM[2]
;C[10 2/3]W[sc]
;B[se]C[12 1/3
Gw2 = 1 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gw3 = 9 2/3]W[rc]
;B[qa]C[12 1/3
Gw4 = 9 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gw5 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gw6 = 9 2/3]
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[sd]C[12 1/3]
;C[10 2/3
Gb2 = 1 2/3]W[sc]
;B[se]C[12 1/3
Gb3 = 1 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gb4 = 9 2/3]W[rc]
;B[qa]C[12 1/3
Gb5 = 9 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gb6 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gb7 = 9 2/3]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2]
;C[-3 1/2
best choice because possible seki is better than the kos
In locale, white follower's count -8.
In expanded locale, white follower's count -7.
In locale with accounting remaining endgame of expanded locale to the locale, white follower's count -7.
Hypothesis 1
Black's long gote
gote count = -3 1/2
gote move value M = 3 1/2
Gb2 = 3 1/2
Gb3 = 12
Gb4 = 5
Gw2 = 3 1/2
confirming Hypothesis 1\:
M <= Gb2, Gb3, Gb4
3 1/2 <= 3 1/2, 12, 5
M <= Gw2
3 1/2 <= 3 1/2]W[rc]
;B[ra]C[best
sente count 0
Gw2 = 3 1/2]
;C[sente seki is best
with expanded locale\:
gote count -5
Gw3 = 12]W[qa]
;B[sd]C[0
Gw4 = 5]
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
(
;B[pa]C[22]
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2];C[4 5/12]W[pa]
;B[sd]C[16 1/3
Gw2 = 11 11/12]
;C[10 2/3
Gw3 = 5 2/3]W[sc]
;B[se]C[12 1/3
Gw4 = 1 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gw5 = 9 2/3]W[rc]
;B[qa]C[12 1/3
Gw6 = 9 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gw7 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gw8 = 9 2/3]
)
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
;B[qb]C[16 1/3]
;C[4 5/12
Gb2 = 11 11/12]W[pa]
;B[sd]C[16 1/3
Gb3 = 11 11/12]
;C[10 2/3
Gb4 = 5 2/3]W[sc]
;B[se]C[12 1/3
Gb5 = 1 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gb6 = 9 2/3]W[rc]
;B[qa]C[12 1/3
Gb7 = 9 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gb8 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gb9 = 9 2/3]
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
;C[-5
because
Black next sente result -5
White next result -6]W[rc]
;B[sd]C[0
because Black next sente result 0
Gw2 = 5]
;C[-5
Gw3 = 5]W[ra]
)
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
;B[sd]C[22]
)
(
;FG[259:]MN[1]PM[2]
;C[5 2/3]W[sb]
;B[qb]C[16 1/3
Gw2 = 10 2/3]
;C[4 5/12
Gw3 = 11 11/12]W[pa]
;B[sd]C[16 1/3
Gw4 = 11 11/12]
;C[10 2/3
Gw5 = 5 2/3]W[sc]
;B[se]C[12 1/3
Gw6 = 1 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gw7 = 9 2/3]W[rc]
;B[qa]C[12 1/3
Gw8 = 9 2/3]
;C[2 2/3
Gw9 = 9 2/3]W[ra]
;B[sa]C[12 1/3
Gw10 = 9 2/3]
)
)
(
;FG[259:]PM[2];C[-7]W[rb]
)
)