It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:19 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Tewari analysis.
Post #1 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 9:39 am 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 313
Liked others: 36
Was liked: 63
Rank: KGS dan
KGS: Toge
Tewari means analyzing the position either by reducing the superfluous stones and deciding which side made more effective moves, or by changing the order of moves played to determine better shape.

I've had fleeting glimpses of positions that could easily be understood with tewari. Correct answer to odd move in invasion for instance respects the usual joseki sequence. Life and death problems are epitome of tewari. Poor move fails the objective while tesuji accomplishes it. "Almost correct" lines of play are often just played in wrong order.

Is shape study meant to give foundation to tewari analysis?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #2 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:08 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
It seems to me that tewari is about finding "good moves". It might be the case that many good shapes contain good moves.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #3 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:26 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Toge wrote:
Is shape study meant to give foundation to tewari analysis?


It is pretty much the other way around. For instance:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Bad Shape
$$ ------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X O O . . . O . .
$$ | . . . X . X O . . , . .
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Tewari reveals Black's shape to be inefficient, although it looks like good shape.

Edit:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Permutation
$$ ------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 9 8 2 . . . 4 . .
$$ | . . . 1 . 5 6 . . , . .
$$ | . . . . . 7 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


In this sequence, :b5: - :b7: is plainly not good for Black.

(Sorry, I thought that this was well known.)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


Last edited by Bill Spight on Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #4 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:55 am 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2116
Location: Silicon Valley
Liked others: 152
Was liked: 330
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Trying to understand Bill's position...

Of course this would be the normal way it would happen:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Bad Shape
$$ ------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 7 6 2 . . . 8 . .
$$ | . . . 1 . 3 4 . . , . .
$$ | . . . . . 5 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 9 . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]



If we reorder it a bit, 5, 6 & 8 are questionable, but 9 is clearly terrible.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ Bad Shape
$$ ------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 1 6 8 . . . 4 . .
$$ | . . . 7 . 9 2 . . , . .
$$ | . . . . . 5 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Am I even remotely close?

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #5 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:14 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 67
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 6
Rank: KGS 3k
KGS: aurik
Also looking forward to "the answer".

Here's my guess:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ The jump attachment is small and overconcentrated
$$ ------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 5 4 2 . . . 6 . .
$$ | . . . 1 . 7 8 . . , . .
$$ | . . . . . 9 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


:b7: attach-hane-extend from :b2: here is a silly idea. B gains very little, and W gets to reinforce his slightly-overextended position.

_________________
Keep in mind, I am frequently wrong.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #6 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:58 am 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1206
Liked others: 51
Was liked: 192
Rank: KGS 5d
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
I find that if both players in a tewari analysis make strange moves, it's best to be wary. It only really comes out right for me if only one player makes strange moves.


This post by Shaddy was liked by: Li Kao
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #7 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:14 pm 
Judan

Posts: 6163
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 789
Toge wrote:
Tewari means analyzing the position either by reducing the superfluous stones and deciding which side made more effective moves, or by changing the order of moves played to determine better shape.


Chapter 4.6 of Joseki Vol. 2 Strategy informs about four further kinds of tewari:

- assessing the difference of numbers of played stones
- forming pairs of stones (or plays) with equal meanings
- move reversion (comparing to another known move order)
- comparing a sequence or shape to other known (similar) sequences or shapes

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #8 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:23 pm 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 5539
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 1103
Was liked: 1456
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Toge wrote:
... Life and death problems are epitome of tewari...


Not really, IMHO, just one of the essential ingredients.

The goal of tewari is to establish whether or not a stone is good, regardless of sequence. ( I think Bill is correct in saying that tewari contributes to the foundation of shape. )

L&D requires proper sequence.
Tewari aims to be independent of sequence.

Indeed, one might say that shape is what remains after tewari has condensed the wisdom of L&D by removing sequence.

_________________
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #9 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:30 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Tewari is kind of interesting in that respect... It makes me wonder: In go, is order important or isn't it?

I'm inclined to think that order is always very important - but then, how can we measure the benefit of tewari?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #10 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:39 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2116
Location: Silicon Valley
Liked others: 152
Was liked: 330
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Tewari, if anything, means order is even more important-- it's not enough to merely play stones in the right order. You have to play in such a way that there is, in retrospect, no order which makes those stones look bad*!

[*] Or, at least, worse than the other guy's moves...

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #11 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:43 pm 
Lives in gote
User avatar

Posts: 643
Location: Munich, Germany
Liked others: 115
Was liked: 102
Rank: KGS 3k
KGS: LiKao / Loki
AFAIK what tewari is based on is:
If you find a reordering of the moves so that each exchange of a black and white stone is either even or bad for the same side, and at least one of them is not bad for that side then the whole sequence is bad for the side.

This implies what Shaddy remarked: If both sides make inefficient moves in a reordering, that reordering isn't fit well for tewari.

It's main use is to find out if certain moves are efficient. It's not useful in life and death, since there the ordering of moves matters a lot, and there is a clear cut goal.

_________________
Sanity is for the weak.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #12 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:47 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
daniel_the_smith wrote:
Tewari, if anything, means order is even more important-- it's not enough to merely play stones in the right order. You have to play in such a way that there is, in retrospect, no order which makes those stones look bad*!

[*] Or, at least, worse than the other guy's moves...


I guess this is kind of where I am confused: If you play in such a way that no order makes the stones look bad, it seems to say that the order in which you play the moves is not important.

As I write this, though, I suppose there is the possibility that order in which you play moves could be important in that you force your opponent to commit to particular moves. The moves that you do to achieve this must, themselves be good in any order. I guess this makes me a little bit less confused.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #13 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:10 pm 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 5539
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 1103
Was liked: 1456
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
daniel_the_smith wrote:
... You have to play in such a way that there is, in retrospect, no order which makes those stones look bad...


Sounds like another definition of shape. :)

_________________
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #14 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:26 pm 
Oza

Posts: 3658
Liked others: 20
Was liked: 4633
Tewari has absolutely nothing to do with life and death.

It has virtually nothing to do with order of moves.

It is a post hoc method of analysing a sequence, almost always a joseki, and is most often used by pros to compare one putative joseki with another, not to analyse good shape.

It means dissecting the moves (te wo waru, or te wo waridasu), that is breaking them up into small units. There are two main techniques. In one, you try to put the moves back together in another order (this is the only area where move order comes in, but it is purely hypothetical). This often reveals a nonsensical move (e.g. you end up having peeped at a bamboo point, although when you played this "peep" it wasn't then a peep and there was no bamboo joint). The other technique is to remove stones in black-white pairs (remembering to include prisoners). This often reveals glaring examples of overconcentration or redundant stones.

It's a bit like pulling legs off a spider to see if it can still walk.

It supposedly (with no proof) goes back to Dosaku.


This post by John Fairbairn was liked by 3 people: daniel_the_smith, ez4u, Joaz Banbeck
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #15 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:35 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Is there a method to evaluate a tewari analysis that you have performed? That is, it seems possible to do it the wrong way. I like Shaddy's suggestion regarding playing "normal" moves for one side. Are there any other ways to ensure that your tewari analysis is correct?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #16 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:14 pm 
Tengen

Posts: 4380
Location: North Carolina
Liked others: 499
Was liked: 733
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Kirby wrote:
Is there a method to evaluate a tewari analysis that you have performed? That is, it seems possible to do it the wrong way. I like Shaddy's suggestion regarding playing "normal" moves for one side. Are there any other ways to ensure that your tewari analysis is correct?
Pray :D

_________________
Occupy Babel!

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #17 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:20 pm 
Gosei
User avatar

Posts: 2116
Location: Silicon Valley
Liked others: 152
Was liked: 330
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Kirby wrote:
Is there a method to evaluate a tewari analysis that you have performed? That is, it seems possible to do it the wrong way. I like Shaddy's suggestion regarding playing "normal" moves for one side. Are there any other ways to ensure that your tewari analysis is correct?


Sacrifice a clam to Dosaku?

_________________
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #18 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:12 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Kirby wrote:
Tewari is kind of interesting in that respect... It makes me wonder: In go, is order important or isn't it?

I'm inclined to think that order is always very important - but then, how can we measure the benefit of tewari?


"Go is the order of play." -- Lin Hai Feng (Rin Kai Ho)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


This post by Bill Spight was liked by 2 people: gogameguru, Harleqin
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #19 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:25 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 1206
Liked others: 51
Was liked: 192
Rank: KGS 5d
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
Kirby wrote:
Is there a method to evaluate a tewari analysis that you have performed? That is, it seems possible to do it the wrong way. I like Shaddy's suggestion regarding playing "normal" moves for one side. Are there any other ways to ensure that your tewari analysis is correct?


Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Tewari analysis.
Post #20 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:35 pm 
Lives in sente
User avatar

Posts: 924
Location: Pittsburgh
Liked others: 45
Was liked: 103
Rank: lazy
KGS: redundant/silchas
Tygem: redundant
Wbaduk: redundant
DGS: redundant
OGS: redundant
Shaddy wrote:
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?


Uh... true. I'll go with true.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group