It is currently Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:45 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Preliminary analysis of 9x9 openings with KataGo
Post #1 Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2021 8:31 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 112
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 26
Rank: 1d
Universal go server handle: iopq
I didn't put in a ton of time on this, but at move 1 it already seems basically correct

This is Japanese KataGo rules with 6 komi using a 60b network

To have actual good analysis I would need about this many playouts on each variation, so I'm still ways out from making any actual claims other than it looks like there are four moves that are equally good in the opening (I verified by testing the 3-3 and 3-4 variations manually)


Attachments:
Screenshot from 2021-10-15 23-26-31.png
Screenshot from 2021-10-15 23-26-31.png [ 171.28 KiB | Viewed 704 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Preliminary analysis of 9x9 openings with KataGo
Post #2 Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2021 2:44 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 112
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 26
Rank: 1d
Universal go server handle: iopq
I've already verified that 3-3 and 3-4 are not optimal by searching from those positions manually

So the top four moves are:

5-5 tengen
4-4 hoshi
5-4 takamoku
5-3 mokuhazushi


Attachments:
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-40-08.png
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-40-08.png [ 166.24 KiB | Viewed 387 times ]
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-39-54.png
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-39-54.png [ 167.85 KiB | Viewed 387 times ]
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-32-37.png
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-32-37.png [ 164.7 KiB | Viewed 387 times ]

This post by iopq was liked by: le_4TC
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Preliminary analysis of 9x9 openings with KataGo
Post #3 Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2021 2:45 am 
Dies with sente

Posts: 112
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 26
Rank: 1d
Universal go server handle: iopq
I'll get a bit more time on it to post the full HTML files, but you get the idea

Most lines close to 50% are most likely to be optimal, lines outside +/- 5% are more likely to be suboptimal


Attachments:
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-40-08.png
Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-40-08.png [ 166.24 KiB | Viewed 387 times ]

This post by iopq was liked by: le_4TC
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group