It is currently Sat Apr 20, 2024 7:03 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: 214 vs 157
Post #1 Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 5:06 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 63
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 3
on a bad computer still its 157 for the wins

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 214 vs 157
Post #2 Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 5:19 pm 
Dies with sente

Posts: 101
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 16
Rank: KGS 2 D
I don't see this with 5000 playouts #157 vs 500 playouts #214.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 214 vs 157
Post #3 Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 11:49 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 337
Liked others: 22
Was liked: 97
Quote:
on a bad computer still its 157 for the wins
If your bad computer can handle 200 visits or more for #214, then #214 is probably stronger than #157 at equal time setting.

Two 100 game matches between #157 and #214 at equal time (LZ0.16, twogtp 1.5.0)

First match parameters :
-v 201 for #214 and -v 701 for #157, -m 20 --randomtemp=0.3 for both (and --noponder -komi 7.5)
Result : #214 wins 50-33 (60.2%)
Low visits and low randomtemp ---> 17 duplicate games, only 83 games used.

Second match : same parameters, -m 20 and --randomtemp=1
Result : #214 wins 61-38 (61.6%)
only 1 duplicate game, 99 games used.

With more than 200 visits and equal time, I suppose the strength difference between #214 and #157 would be increasing.

**********************************************

The games of the second match (2 and 6 are duplicates, 214 is B in the even numbered games)
Attachment:
214_157.zip [86.63 KiB]
Downloaded 386 times
The second match parameters and stats :
Attachment:
214 157.gif
214 157.gif [ 69.91 KiB | Viewed 3433 times ]

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: 214 vs 157
Post #4 Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2019 6:48 pm 
Dies in gote

Posts: 63
Liked others: 0
Was liked: 3
Thanks for the data, I was only giving it around 50... I guess 200 is a reasonable number for benchmark. Good to see that it has finally surpassed 157.

I recall when the dontbiteme guy was posting weekly updates on reddit he had already gone down to around 35 when he stopped posting.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group