dfan wrote:
I was astonished to recently learn that their size of 30 is considered extremely thin; if I had read modern web pages and threads before buying them I probably would have been dissuaded from the purchase. They seem thick enough to me! So even my moderate-sized go equipment fetish doesn't extend to requiring size 36+ stones.
While I'm not going to pay €1500 for a set of stones, I'm eventually going to get something better than glass stones. What I'd like to know: the glass stones have "20" in a string of Korean letters.
Could they be size 20? On one site, I found that size 20 would be 6mm. Size 28 is 7.5mm. I can play perfectly fine with my stones. To be honest, when looking at the image at Mr. Kuroki's site, I think size 32 is the best looking. Size image:
Size 36, and especially 40, start looking like an egg instead of a go stone... IMHO.
Would it be helpful if I posted an image of the box of my stones? I wonder if the 20 is indeed the size, because it seems charts in most places seem to start at 25 or 28, 36 seems to be the 'golden standard' for a lot of people, but my stones feel quite alright in the size/weight department. At least, to me, as I don't have any other reference.
edit: I stuck a few of the white stones in a caliper. They were between 8.48 and 8.52mm. Size 30 stones are 8mm, Size 32 are 8.8, so these stones are a tiny bit larger than size 31.