Life In 19x19
http://lifein19x19.com/

Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape
http://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=14552
Page 2 of 7

Author:  hyperpape [ Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . b . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 7 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W c . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . d O . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

I've been playing from my phone for a few moves, which makes it hard to comment (or even move).

The first question was whether anyone would play a king in the first four moves. I narrowly chose not to. Next question is whether White will play a king here. I mentioned the Chen Yaoye-Ke Jie game where precisely this corner formation by White (after :b9:,
, White a, Black b became weak. However, I think that's a rare occurrence in games I play.

One thing about playing the king is that it (potentially) changes the value of the c-d trade. Once White has one king, playing the second is free. Of course, if so, that doesn't imply the first king was a good idea.

Btw: I looked at this fuseki, and I see that Black usually prefers to approach in the upper right before playing :b9:. I don't think my comments depend on assuming we complete the joseki immediately.

Author:  jeromie [ Sat Sep 23, 2017 7:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . @ , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 7 a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 6 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . @ , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Didn't really consider any other moves, but I did consider whether or not I should make this a king. I've looked over continuations from this position, and I can't find any variations where white sacrifices this group in the corner. This does have the downside of making this group impossible to sacrifice, but I don't think there are any circumstances where I would want to do that anyway.

The real question is what comes next. I assume black will continue the joseki with a or b, and then I have to decide whether to finish the joseki with c or tenuki to d or e. I would like to tenuki in this situation, but the kingo variant adds some extra value to playing at c. There is effectively a group tax, so being sealed in the corner comes with an extra penalty. Plus any stones I can add to a group that is already alive are worth an extra point, so I would like to retain the opportunity to grow that group. I'll have to decide whether reducing the value of his outer influence is worth giving up those gains.


One rules clarification: if we make it to final scoring does white receive any komi?

Author:  EdLee [ Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

Not for players.
jeromie wrote:
This does have the downside of making this group impossible to sacrifice,
True for any king move in kingo; nothing particular about this corner situation.

A downside, indeed. How much will depend on the rest of the game.

I'm curious which "continuations" Jeromie studied:
from joseki dictionaries or pro games ?
I feel it's too early and heavy to make these 2 W stones 'priceless'.
It means B has absolute ko threats here, versus without the king.

Author:  EdLee [ Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:11 pm ]
Post subject: 

Hi Jeromie,
jeromie wrote:
I can't find any variations where white sacrifices this group in the corner. This does have the downside of making this group impossible to sacrifice, but I don't think there are any circumstances where I would want to do that anyway.
Which resource(s) did you search ? Joseki dictionaries or pro game database ?

Author:  EdLee [ Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

For luigi and players:
I'm unclear on one of the rules ( also, re: Jeromie's komi question):
please see post 14.

Author:  jeromie [ Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re:

EdLee wrote:
Hi Jeromie,
jeromie wrote:
I can't find any variations where white sacrifices this group in the corner. This does have the downside of making this group impossible to sacrifice, but I don't think there are any circumstances where I would want to do that anyway.
Which resource(s) did you search ? Joseki dictionaries or pro game database ?



I made a (non-exhaustive) search at ps.waltheri.net and looked at josekipedia as well. I'm sure that there is a game (or even many games!) where white did sacrifice the corner, but I looked through enough resources to feel it is probably uncommon and I think I can keep the group alive without taking a global loss.

Author:  luigi [ Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

EdLee wrote:
For luigi and players:
I'm unclear on one of the rules ( also, re: Jeromie's komi question):
please see post 14.

See post 17.

jeromie, hyperpape, I'm a much worse Go player than you are, but, if it's too late for you guys to impartially agree on a komi value, I'll set it at 6 points and decree that the button be used to break ties.

Author:  jeromie [ Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Re:

luigi wrote:
EdLee wrote:
For luigi and players:
I'm unclear on one of the rules ( also, re: Jeromie's komi question):
please see post 14.

See post 17.

jeromie, hyperpape, I'm a much worse Go player than you are, but, if it's too late for you guys to impartially agree on a komi value, I'll set it at 6 points and decree that the button be used to break ties.


That sounds fine to me, but since I gain the advantage by using komi I will defer to hyperpape.

Author:  hyperpape [ Sun Sep 24, 2017 11:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Is 6 komi with a button equivalent to 6.5 komi? I think that's reasonable. My gut reaction is that I'd expect komi in this game to be similar. But I could be wrong.

Author:  Bill Spight [ Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

hyperpape wrote:
Is 6 komi with a button equivalent to 6.5 komi?


7 pt. komi with a button (area scoring) is equivalent to a 6.5 komi (territory scoring), with some exceptions, such as having a seki with an odd number of dame.

Author:  luigi [ Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

hyperpape wrote:
Is 6 komi with a button equivalent to 6.5 komi?

No. The button is a special token which adds half a point to its owner. At his turn a player may take the button instead of making a board play or passing. Taking the button lifts any restriction on taking a ko or superko. The button can only be taken once by one of the players.

Author:  luigi [ Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

Bill Spight wrote:
hyperpape wrote:
Is 6 komi with a button equivalent to 6.5 komi?


7 pt. komi with a button (area scoring) is equivalent to a 6.5 komi (territory scoring), with some exceptions, such as having a seki with an odd number of dame.

That's interesting. I knew 7 komi under area scoring was the best approximation to 6.5 komi under territory scoring (in the sense that Black's average result should be the same in both cases), but I thought the button produced a different spread of results.

What other exceptions are there?

Author:  jeromie [ Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm10
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . a 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

I considered a-d, all of which have been played in professional games. b was played by Go Seigen in a game against Sakata Eio, which made it especially tempting to try. :-) But every game since 2000 that has ended up in this position has played a (according to ps.waltheri.net), and I think that is most likely to lead to the kind of territorial game for white that I am aiming for.

Author:  hyperpape [ Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

C14, pawn.

(I'm on my phone and can't get diagrams to work).

Author:  jeromie [ Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm10
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . @ , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


I decided a king was good enough for one side, might as well do it for the other as well.

Author:  hyperpape [ Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

D6, pawn.

My rule of thumb is that if a group is likely to come under attack, and I need flexibility, I will not play a king. I think this qualifies.

I wonder if I should have considered a low approach to white's stones on the left, given that his position has two kings. I think he was right to play kings where he did. That said, the value is less than two points, and I can't be sure a different approach wouldn't have lost more than that.

Author:  jeromie [ Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm10
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm10
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . 1 X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 2 b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


The most common pro move in this situation, by far, is at a (48/52 on ps.waltheri.net, though most of those are older games). b has been played a few times, though, and is at least worth considering.

I'm a bit torn. I feel like the move at a is consistent with my desire to play a territorial game, but I don't like the direction things develop if I let black build up massive influence across the whole board while all of my stones are confined to two corners. The truth is that I feel far more comfortable working for a balance of territory and influence. I also think a is likely to lead to a large secure area for black where he can potentially play many kings.

So, change in direction. I'm going to play b because it's a viable move and it feels right. I like the balance between territory and influence it creates, and allowing that group to break out means I don't have two super heavy groups to manage. I do have to be careful about black moves against the lower left now, since I can't sacrifice that group, but I think I can manager. (I finally found some variations where white sacrifices the move I kinged earlier, but it actually came in a game where white played at a.)

Author:  EdLee [ Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

Possible:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 3 , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]

Author:  Schachus [ Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

EdLee wrote:
Possible:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X O 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 3 , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]

I would expect black to play the attachment on the bottom first, at least if dont take into account kingo speciallyties yet. Your variation feels just better for white than
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a 4 . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . W , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . O . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------------------[/go]
(alternatively 4 at a), so my intuition is to punish white for not finishing the bottom first. Maybe it isnt really better though, cause in your game variation black gets sente, while in the other one white would have sente

Author:  Bill Spight [ Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kingo Malkovitch#1: Jeromie vs. Hyperpape

luigi wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
hyperpape wrote:
Is 6 komi with a button equivalent to 6.5 komi?


7 pt. komi with a button (area scoring) is equivalent to a 6.5 komi (territory scoring), with some exceptions, such as having a seki with an odd number of dame.

That's interesting. I knew 7 komi under area scoring was the best approximation to 6.5 komi under territory scoring (in the sense that Black's average result should be the same in both cases), but I thought the button produced a different spread of results.

What other exceptions are there?


As you have pointed out, having seki with an odd number of dame is not an exception. I goofed. :oops:

But there are one way dame, which do not have to be played before the button. For instance, suppose that Black has a one way dame and a territory score of 6. Because she does not have to play the one way dame before the button is taken, she will get an area score of 7.5. After the button is taken, she will have a score of 6.5, and then she takes the one way dame for one more point. Also, there are ko fights that may not be finished until after the button is taken, and they may be exceptions, as well. In addition, it is possible to have positions on the board that are equivalent to a button (I have constructed one), so that who gets the button does not matter.

Page 2 of 7 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/