It seems as though I've had a series of games recently in which my opponents get moyos and, no matter what I try, nothing seems to stop them from getting a large amount of territory. I build a moyo, and nothing good comes out of it. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to what makes one moyo better than another, and no coherent way to figure out how to deal with my opponents' moyos. Or, there is some way, but I haven't been able to figure out from looking at any of my games what to do with somewhat differently shaped moyos in other games.
(If you couldn't tell, I had white in this game, and was surprised to lose by only 2.5, although my opponent really screwed up. I probably should have had to resign halfway in with a giant dead group.)
Territory for thee, but not for me
-
mitsun
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:10 pm
- Rank: AGA 5 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 250 times
Re: Territory for thee, but not for me
I think you are playing too cautiously. You are concerned with fixing your own weaknesses, but never seem to consider that your opponent has weaknesses for you to exploit. Next time your opponent makes a forcing move, look for ways to resist and fight back, instead of passively defending. And look carefully at your opponents position for weaknesses you can attack. Some specific comments:
is a good invasion/reduction. Part of its strength is that the B group to the left does not yet have a wide base. So it would help if you though of your move partly as a strong attacking move, not just a weak reducing move. Then when B attaches below, you would first thank him, then promptly block on the left side. That way, if B draws back and you connect, the four B stones to the left would become quite weak. With the direction of play in the game, B is strong on both sides, so your stones do become simply a reduction. Still, it is a reasonable reduction, and you have no cause for dissatisfaction yet.
should probably be a solid connection, leaving no peep, and
was heavy and got you into trouble.
was an attack on your eye shape, more than a threat to make territory. Why not let B connect under, if he wants to invest another move? The B position would be very low, and you have already made a successful reduction. Better alternatives would be to push at J16 and/or jump safely into the center at L14 (as you noted).
was probably an overplay -- just N13 would be safe and thick. Nevertheless, you played consistently through
to make good shape and get a reasonable local result. After that, however, you spent way too many moves passively defending the right side group.
in particular helps you not at all. Consider something like Q14 or P15, partly defensive, but partly offensive, threatening the three B stones to the left. When trying to settle a weak group, it is important to get counter-play against your opponent's weaknesses if at all possible.
was again much too passive. Playing dame to live inside should be your last resort. The same goes for your opponent, who would not want to play there unless you were already surrounded and it was the killing move. In this position, M9 or N8 would be much more positive and useful moves.
The B invasion at H3 was very deep, and you let your opponent settle here without any resistance. If you had to kill this stone, how would you play differently? I suggest playing that way in a future game, just to develop your killer instinct. Moves like :w120: at J2 or :w122: at E2 come to mind. Of course this would become and all-or-nothing attack, but if you are behind why not go for it?
Finally, did you ever consider invading at R17? That seems like the sort of move you hate to see your opponent make against you. It would not be easy to kill that invasion outright.
The B invasion at H3 was very deep, and you let your opponent settle here without any resistance. If you had to kill this stone, how would you play differently? I suggest playing that way in a future game, just to develop your killer instinct. Moves like :w120: at J2 or :w122: at E2 come to mind. Of course this would become and all-or-nothing attack, but if you are behind why not go for it?
Finally, did you ever consider invading at R17? That seems like the sort of move you hate to see your opponent make against you. It would not be easy to kill that invasion outright.
-
DrStraw
- Oza
- Posts: 2180
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
- Rank: AGA 5d
- GD Posts: 4312
- Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
- Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
- Has thanked: 237 times
- Been thanked: 662 times
- Contact:
Re: Territory for thee, but not for me
Not really much to add, but I will point out one thing.
is better at K14 to capture the stone. Given that you can make an eye with N18 any time that would take away a lot of the need to later live with that group and so make the game easier.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).
- Fedya
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:21 pm
- Rank: 6-7k KGS
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 139 times
Re: Territory for thee, but not for me
Great googly moogly!DrStraw wrote:Not really much to add, but I will point out one thing.
is better at K14 to capture the stone.
This I didn't see at all. I didn't think I had an eye at the top. That having been said, even when I play the first move in a reduction, I generally have difficulty seeing where the eye-space is supposed to come from.Given that you can make an eye with N18 any time
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
Excellent examples of different levels of basics.Fedya wrote:Great googly moogly!DrStraw wrote:is better at K14 to capture the stone.
This I didn't see at all.Given that you can make an eye with N18 any time
Many people here on the forum (and on KGS, etc.) like to ask about the basics/fundamentals.
For example, this other thread, starting at around Post #59.
Will also cross-reference that thread back to here.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Territory for thee, but not for me
I second that. Very important.mitsun wrote:I think you are playing too cautiously. You are concerned with fixing your own weaknesses, but never seem to consider that your opponent has weaknesses for you to exploit. Next time your opponent makes a forcing move, look for ways to resist and fight back, instead of passively defending. And look carefully at your opponents position for weaknesses you can attack.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.