It is currently Fri Jun 23, 2017 10:25 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Getting back into reviewing my games
Post #1 Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:41 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 198
Liked others: 76
Was liked: 96
Rank: AGA 6k
KGS: 2k
Here is a game I played recently. I actually recorded a video of my thoughts while playing which was informative for my self-review, but I'm too lazy edit to out the swearing. In general, I think that the opening went well for me, but I wasn't able to sustain that advantage through the endgame. There are definitely a few slow moves and I underestimated my opponents lower center potential.

I am playing white.


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Getting back into reviewing my games
Post #2 Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:40 pm 
Judan

Posts: 6168
Liked others: 1454
Was liked: 2349
Hi, Calvin! :)

A few comments. Go to move 111.


Main focus: The endgame is fighting strength. :)

_________________
"Drooling Banjos"


This post by Bill Spight was liked by: Calvin Clark
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Getting back into reviewing my games
Post #3 Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:17 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 198
Liked others: 76
Was liked: 96
Rank: AGA 6k
KGS: 2k
@Bill Spight

With respect to the game move at 112, I see your point. It's kind of a small-scale double-open skirt, so there is less value in trying to close the bottom. I guess I didn't see it that way in the game. I was doing more of a local pattern matching.

My failure to see C11 is, I think, psychological. I had previously decided (even before move 54) that the C9 and D9 stones were light and could be sacrificed, so I reminded myself for the next few moves after that not to try to defend them. Now, of course, the game changes and the circumstances change, and by the endgame I guess they become useful in a different way. So I need to be sharper in the endgame but also be willing to discard my previous evaluations. I had considered L4 for White 112, but not K5. That's clever to have the ladder breaker follow-up!

I think there is also kind a "weak player's consensus" going on, where a vital point is missed by both players because they each trust each other that it doesn't work, even if it does. :)

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group