It matters quite a bit which of the criteria is used, and that page doesn't specify.

_________________
Occupy Babel!

They have always used the same definition, having a European passport (including any EGF member countries)

Not that it matters much this year.

My impressions:

It's better to give the players the right to choose the partner, starting from #1 (Catalin Taranu).
So, he will be able to choose the weakest opponent from top 8 (will be fair).

Silt vs Artem pair seems to be unfair. Ondrej Silt was 2nd in preliminary (very successful perfomance), but got a very hard opponent.

_________________
Go lessons: http://breakfast.go4go.net/
Russian Go news: https://vk.com/go_secrets/

Does this more or less mean citizenship? I've never really known the rules here in the US (which aren't really applicable, but they're my reference point), but it seems that in almost every case, you have a passport only if you are a US citizen (resident aliens, or permanent immigrants, may be given a card guaranteeing reentry to the US--perhaps this is colloquially called a passport, though I don't know).

How difficult is it for permanent residents to become a citizen?

_________________
Occupy Babel!

this is nothing about fairness

the champion should be able to beat any of the oponent and not wait to get the weaker

This is an interesting idea, I think. But what if Taranu chooses Silt, for example? Then Silt, who was very successful so far, suddenly gets a very strong opponent. That seems unfair to Silt?

Perhaps the choice should be by the top four (in order), but only from the bottom four? (i.e Taranu, then Silt, then Shikshin, then Mitic get to choose from the list Debarre, Kachanovkyi, Dinerchtein, Burzo/Surin)



Yes, this is because Artem was very unsuccessful. Had the tournament continued as McMahon, like in previous years, then Silt-Artem would almost certainly also have been in the next pairing.

Where can I find the bracket?

AFAIK, no official bracket has been made yet. The bracket we are talking about here is the one I calculated based on the EGC rules, which I posted in post #40 of this thread. I will repeat it here:

Kachanovskyi - Silt
Taranu - Burzo/Surin
Mitic - Dinerchtein
Shikshin - Debarre

(note: the order of the players here does not imply anything about the color they play with).

Again, this is not an official bracket!

Ah I see, thanks for clarifying. Burzo and Surin are playing their relegationmatch for the 8th spot at the moment (broadcasted via KGS).

edit: The resultpage has been updated:
http://egc2011.eu/index.php/en/results- ... de-finales

Pairings fot the Knockout quarterfinals

Catalin Taranu – Cornel Burzo or Dmitriy Surin (relegation game Wednesday, 3rd August)

Ondrej Silt – Artem Kachanovskyi

Ilja Shikshin – Thomas Debarre

Dusan Mitic – Alexandr Dinershteyn

Colours in Knockout will be chosen by the pairing program

According to gokifu.com Cornel Burzo won by half a point.

http://gokifu.com/s/mkp-gokifu-20110803 ... 6d%29.html

No big surprises in the quarterfinals as Taranu, Kachanovskiy, Shikshin and Dinershteyn all won. But the semifinals will be really interesting! If my understanding of the brackets is correct - which is not guaranteed - the semi-finals will be:

Taranu - Kachanovskiy
Shikshin - Dinershteyn

Basically, both of them will be a clash of generations! And my "dream final", Ilya Shikshin - Artem Kachanovskiy, is still possible

_________________
My name is Gijs, from Utrecht, NL.

When in doubt, play the most aggressive move

That would be the rematch of last year right?

I am hoping for Taranu - Shikshin.

Shikshin and Dinerchtein have already played, so that pairing will be avoided. I expect:

Taranu - Dinerchtein
Shikshin - Kachanovskyi

Very exciting so far, BTW. I think these four guys are probably the strongest active players in Europe at the moment.

Where can I see the sgf's of the quaterfinals? The Shikshin v Debarre game is on Go Sensations but I can't find the other three anywhere? I'm particularly keen to see how Taranu's & Cornel's game continued after I was driven to bed by tiredness at 1am.

The games were broadcast on KGS, and you can find the Taranu-Burzo game there by looking at the games of the user: EGC2011B4. The other quarterfinals were broadcast by EGC2011B1, EGC2011B2 and EGC2011B3

_________________
Patience, grasshopper.

bazilxp also adds games to gokifu and gives links to them in his version of the tournament table.

Catalin Taranu vs. Ilja Shikshin it is. They already played agaisnt each other in the EGC 2011 Pandanet European Team Championship Final where Ilja won W+12.5
I hope Catalin makes it!

http://gokifu.com/s/m34-gokifu-20110724 ... 7d%29.html

In the game with Artem, Ilja won.
http://gokifu.com/s/mp3

In the first part of the game, Artem had a good advantage and everyone thought he would win. But Ilja managed to build a moyo on the bottom and forced Artem to live inside with a ko. After Artem won this ko, Ilja took advantage and attacked big dragon on the left, which led to its death.
Ilja is really able to make wonders on the board. I definitely hope he wins tomorrow.

Wow, the Artem vs. Ilya game is really tough fighting! It's almost like watching the average Lee Sedol game - waay over my head

Addendum: even though white lost, move 188 (http://gokifu.com/s/mp3) is really interesting! My understanding of that move - no guarantees - is this: Artem knew that no matter what, black would have exactly one ko threat at the top, which is too big for white to ignore. White has exactly one local threat, and no other real threats. OK, so both sides have one threat. That means that to win the ko, white has to capture first. Thus, rather than starting the ko immediately by playing 2-1, he decided to give black a full move for free (!) by playing 1-1. Now, when the ko starts, white captures first! In other words, he is trading a full move for a single ko threat!! Think about that the next time you play an aji keshi à la "all I'm losing is a ko threat, nothing more"

_________________
My name is Gijs, from Utrecht, NL.

When in doubt, play the most aggressive move

Nice explanation Gijs, must admit I went "Huh?" when I saw that.