I played black in this game and lost 17.5 points by move 80.
Game 20, position 1
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Should black follow up in the lower right?
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . . , . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . 6 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

was new to me. I thought about playing a local followup, such a 3-3 invasion at
a or a double approach at
d. I finally decided to tenuki at
c, but I think
a would have been a slightly better choice.
Afterwards, I reviewed various options for

and how black should respond to each of them, and came up with this rough guide:
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Keima extension
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . . , . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . 7 8 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
If white plays the keima extension at

, then black plays the familiar contact joseki.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc One-space extension
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . . , . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
If white plays the one-space extension, then a black follow-up is not so urgent and a tenuki such at
b is fine. However, locally a followup at
a is also a good option.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Loose extension or pincer
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . . , . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . 6 6 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . 6 6 6 . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . 6 6 . . 5 . . 7 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
If white plays any of the loose extensions on the right, or a pincer on the bottom, then the 3-3 invasion is great. Basically a double approach is not good when one of the two approaching stones is already pincered.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Double approach
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . . , . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 3 . . . . . , . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . 5 . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
The one exceptional pincer is the low pincer.

is especially helpful for containing a 3-3 invasion, so in this case the double approach is preferred. It is also good when white tenukis, e.g. at
a,
b, or
c.
Game 20, position 2
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc Double approach joseki
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 5 c . X d . . .
$$ | . . 4 O . 7 b . . ,
$$ | . . 6 a . . . . . .
$$ | . . X 1 3 . . . . .
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . ,[/go]
I think this is a pretty normal double-approach joseki, but I'm still not super familiar with

(which is also a slightly mistake in the game position).
At this point I was thinking about how to make use of my upper-side stone and considered moves like
b,
c, and
d, but actually the push at
a is considered the best move.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Continuation
$$ --------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 7 5 4 . . . . . .
$$ | . 3 O 6 . X . c b .
$$ | . . X O 2 O . . a ,
$$ | . . X 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O O . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . ,[/go]
After

, white will enclose the top with a move like
a,
b, or
c, but black can continue to reduce white's top anyway (the exact technique depending on white's move). Or, if white tries to tenuki instead, then black may play something like
c to help the isolated black stone.
Game 20, position 3
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Double approach joseki
$$ | . . . , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . 3 4 . .
$$ | . . . X . 1 2 . .
$$ | . . . . 5 O . . .
$$ | . . . . 6 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ ------------------[/go]
My own corner was double-approached, leading to this sequence.

seems like a group tax-style move.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Continuation from the game
$$ | . . . , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . 3 . . .
$$ | . . . . . X O . .
$$ | . . . X . X O . .
$$ | . . a . X O . . .
$$ | . . . 1 O 2 . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ ------------------[/go]
I played this sequence, thinking to keep white separated and be able to attack the stone on the left side. However, black will be unable to make a severe attack given the aji in the corner e.g. at
a. Therefore this is not a good plan.
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Better idea
$$ | . . . , . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . 4 . . .
$$ | . . . . . X O . .
$$ | . . . X . X O . .
$$ | . . . . X O 2 . .
$$ | . . . 3 O 1 . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ ------------------[/go]
Instead, black should capture one stone and allow white to enclose with

. Now black is completely safe and can take sente to play elsewhere.