Life In 19x19
http://lifein19x19.com/

Commentary on the first game by Rob van Zeijst
http://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=9819
Page 1 of 1

Author:  daal [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Commentary on the first game by Rob van Zeijst

This match has inspired yet another great commentary, this one by Rob van Zeijst. In his announcement on Facebook, he prefaced the article and commentary with: "To all Go Associations and Go Lovers: If you want to publish this article in your own language for free, it is possible, but send me an email for the conditions: rob.yourteacher[at]gmail.com or send a message to Rob van Zeijst on Facebook. Thank you"

http://www.kiseido.com/printss/guliten1.html

Author:  macelee [ Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Commentary on the first game by Rob van Zeijst

I like the way the commentary is presented. Any idea how that web page was generated?

Author:  Knotwilg [ Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Commentary on the first game by Rob van Zeijst

The best argument against odd numbered game series is that, if a 6-5 win in an 11 game series suffices to declare a winner, then 1 game would be sufficient too. Here's my proof:

Let X be the better player and Y the other player. Let p be the probability that X wins a game against Y (p>0,5).
The game series has a double purpose: find out who is X, but also get a better idea about p.
Our current estimate would be Lee Sedol being X and p is determined by the 18-17 score in his favor.
At 5-5, we would still estimate Lee Sedol being stronger but p is now determined by a 23-22 score in his favor.
If Lee Sedol wins 6-5, he clinches the title while the probability that they are actually of equal strength, or even Gu is slightly stronger, is higher than if Lee Sedol would win 1-0.

So it would be fairer to make Lee decisively stronger after 1-0 than after 6-5.
With 6-4 it's all different. Now the probability that Gu is better, given 24-21, is lower than given 19-17.

Similarly, it would be unfair to give Gu the title at a 6-5 win (being an overall 23-23 tie), than at a 1-0 win (18-18 tie), because chances they're equal are even increased after the 11 game series.

An even jubango only yields a winner if there are at least 2 games difference. The difference between the probabilities to indicate a wrong winner in the 6-4 case and the 6-5 case is quite high.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/