In eidogo, it is said that the following sequence is bad for white -- W6 should be in B7 instead.
However, the following sequence looks very playable for white, as the black pincher stone is under attack. Could someone enlighten me any misunderstanding that I have? Thanks.
A question on a joseki
-
Splatted
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:41 pm
- Rank: Washed up never was
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: Splatted
- Has thanked: 681 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: A question on a joseki
In your diagram black isn't really under attack. Consider one more move.
Now the white stones are threatened. White can jump out too but there's no way he can keep ahead of black on both sides.
To answer your question though, consider the position without the slide which appears in this joseki.
A move at b is more profitable for white than a move at a, so he wants to try and settle his stones in a way that avoids the need to play a and thus preserves the option of playing b. Although the move order is different this shows us that white's position is inefficient if he creates that shape.
To answer your question though, consider the position without the slide which appears in this joseki.
A move at b is more profitable for white than a move at a, so he wants to try and settle his stones in a way that avoids the need to play a and thus preserves the option of playing b. Although the move order is different this shows us that white's position is inefficient if he creates that shape.
- moyoaji
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:53 pm
- Rank: KGS 1 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: moyoaji
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 218 times
Re: A question on a joseki
When you play the slide as white in this joseki you are saying that you want the corner. To not play
on the 3-3 is being inconsistent. If you want to jump out then you need to do it immediately.
The problem with playing the jump is that white has a weak group coming under attack when there is no need to be weak. If you play like this, white now is alive in the corner. Black cannot really harass white. Additionally,
has removed black's base in the corner while making one for himself. This principle is common in go - a move that makes a base for both sides is important. The most common follow-up is this:
White has modest corner potential and a hugely important ladder breaker move. If white has the ladder black should not play the original pincer move. Bringing out
and splitting black in two is devastating as black's corner stones have no base.
The problem with playing the jump is that white has a weak group coming under attack when there is no need to be weak. If you play like this, white now is alive in the corner. Black cannot really harass white. Additionally,
White has modest corner potential and a hugely important ladder breaker move. If white has the ladder black should not play the original pincer move. Bringing out
"You have to walk before you can run. Black 1 was a walking move.
I blushed inwardly to recall the ignorant thoughts that had gone through
my mind before, when I had not realized the true worth of Black 1."
-Kageyama Toshiro on proper moves
I blushed inwardly to recall the ignorant thoughts that had gone through
my mind before, when I had not realized the true worth of Black 1."
-Kageyama Toshiro on proper moves
-
TheBigH
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 1:06 am
- Rank: OGS 9kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Geelong, Australia
- Has thanked: 199 times
- Been thanked: 76 times
Re: A question on a joseki
...sooo, if Black wants the corner he should play
at
in moyoaji's first diagram and let white extend along the top?
Poka King of the south east.
- moyoaji
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:53 pm
- Rank: KGS 1 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: moyoaji
- Location: Michigan, USA
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 218 times
Re: A question on a joseki
Correct!TheBigH wrote:...sooo, if Black wants the corner he should playat
in moyoaji's first diagram and let white extend along the top?
And from that reasoning is where we get this common joseki: I like to come up with a "story" or something to help remember the reasons behind each move in a joseki so that I don't just blindly memorize them. This is my "story" of the common 4-4 approach, small knight response joseki.
All in all, a very peaceful joseki.
"You have to walk before you can run. Black 1 was a walking move.
I blushed inwardly to recall the ignorant thoughts that had gone through
my mind before, when I had not realized the true worth of Black 1."
-Kageyama Toshiro on proper moves
I blushed inwardly to recall the ignorant thoughts that had gone through
my mind before, when I had not realized the true worth of Black 1."
-Kageyama Toshiro on proper moves
-
skydyr
- Oza
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: skydyr
- Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
- Location: DC
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
Re: A question on a joseki
An important consideration with this joseki (the one moyoaji posted) is also
. At
, black also said "I'll stay a bit lower and take less potential if you give me sente at the end."
As an alternative:
Here, black says with
"I want to limit your top more, or build on a larger scale on the left than in that other joseki. In exchange, I will owe you a move somewhere around A, and so either I will give up sente soon to fix it, or you'll have the opportunity to take advantage of my weakness later."
It follows that if black already has a stone around A or so, there's usually not much reason to play
at B. Black can play on a grander scale with this
and still end in sente.
As an alternative:
Here, black says with
It follows that if black already has a stone around A or so, there's usually not much reason to play
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: A question on a joseki
Black has one weak group, white two, so black is fine. But black has many other choices, one very easy one to avoid the pincer stone being attacked is:gostudent wrote:
However, the following sequence looks very playable for white, as the black pincher stone is under attack. Could someone enlighten me any misunderstanding that I have? Thanks.
If white continues in the corner at a after blocking and white connect black extends to b to settle his group. Yes white is now alive, but it's smaller life than had he got the 3-3 point.
And more advanced:
Jump out in response to the pincer is locally bad for white and is not really considered joseki afaik. However, it can occasionally be good in the global situation, here is one example from Lee Sedol I saw recently.
The important thing here is he made the should hit at n16 and wants to make influence. I believe he also succeeds in making f17 for c14 a bad exchange.
Full game here: http://www.go4go.net/go/games/sgfview/40678
Just for reference here's Lee playing the normal joseki a few months later: http://www.go4go.net/go/games/sgfview/41275