I recently had this corner position as black, and I now know the worst possible way to think about it: assume the corner has been killed, and only after w takes the 4 stones, to think it's a ko that I don't automatically win, then after the ko starts to ignore his threat at a and then watch my stones die. I suppose my failure to examine the corner was fueled by vaguely remembering that in Japanese rules, a bent 4 in the corner (with no outside liberties and no unremovable ko threats - forgot that) is dead. After looking at Senseis library, it turns out that my misconception was even worse, because without having filled the outside liberties, white is unconditionally alive (w can capture the 4 stones then crush whatever b plays. So this post is just a memento to a disaster that I hope won't happen again soon.
Bent 4 in the corner utterly misunderstood
-
daal
- Oza
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:30 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 1304 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: Bent 4 in the corner utterly misunderstood
When we talk about bent four in the corner it's often a shape which can be turned into a bent four, as below. If white has outside liberties then you don't want to turn it into one yet because it allows white to live by the crush, you only want to do so once the liberties are filled. It might help to think of it like a temporary seki: you don't want to start action on the inside with b because that allows the corner to live, but neither can the opponent live if he plays first.
-
daal
- Oza
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:30 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 1304 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: Bent 4 in the corner utterly misunderstood
Thanks for that clarification Uberdude. In essence, the position I showed wasn't a bent 4 in the corner at all.
Patience, grasshopper.
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
Re: Bent 4 in the corner utterly misunderstood
Its topic was 'internal liberty shortage'.
Last edited by RobertJasiek on Wed Nov 26, 2014 6:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
John Fairbairn
- Oza
- Posts: 3724
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:09 am
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 4672 times
Re: Bent 4 in the corner utterly misunderstood
Insofar as this is a reference to the underlying Japanese form, a problem is that the term refers to the intersections not the stones. Bent four refers to four empty points.When we talk about bent four in the corner it's often a shape which can be turned into a bent four, as below.
We get the same problem with e.g. sanmoku nakade, which too many people take to refer to a three-stone nakade shape. Again, no. It means three empty points where you can play a nakade - a move in the middle. Moku has some confusing usages, not to mention the character having different readings, which is one more reason to frown on the Hikaru babes (mis)using the term.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Bent 4 in the corner utterly misunderstood
It was bent four in the corner, but it wasn't Bent Four in the Corner.daal wrote:Thanks for that clarification Uberdude. In essence, the position I showed wasn't a bent 4 in the corner at all.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.