Not enough room to post what went wrong
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
- quantumf
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:36 pm
- Rank: 3d
- GD Posts: 422
- KGS: komi
- Has thanked: 180 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: Re:
I think that its OK to point out opponent mistakes, at least if both players are at roughly the same level, as they're likely to be making similar kinds of mistakes.Fedya wrote:Why shouldn't you mention when somebody's opponent made a mistake and that the person who requested the review has the chance to take advantage, even if that advantage is "only" taking a neglected big part of the board?
There are quite a few differences, but I'm not sure which one(s) Ed is referring to, so I'll leave it to him to explain. Unfortunately (if you want quick answers) it seems Ed prefers you figure out these things on your ownFedya wrote:I still don't see the difference.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
Hi quantum, Thanks.
I started a PM with Fedya. We'll see how it goes from there.
Actually, there is another thread where I tried to discuss some of these issues,
with some interesting results.
You're correct that, in general, if someone wants some quick and easy answers,
they may not always be available.
( Sometimes, they are. )
I started a PM with Fedya. We'll see how it goes from there.
Actually, there is another thread where I tried to discuss some of these issues,
with some interesting results.
You're correct that, in general, if someone wants some quick and easy answers,
they may not always be available.
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: Not enough room to post what went wrong
No I think it is probably a mistake, but I am not sure. Also playing somewhat over-ambitious moves (which is what this jump is if a move on the corner is indeed better which I'm not sure, should white help his right side group instead, or k15, or something in top right corner?) could well be a good idea in an attempt to catch up. I would not be incredulous if a player stronger than myself said it was a good move. As a 4d I can find probably 50+ mistakes in a 7k game by spending just a few seconds to come to the conclusion a move is a mistake, whereas this one requires quite a few minutes of thought and even then I could be wrong. I thought your previous comment:quantumf wrote:Am I to conclude from this, by induction, that it's OK at 5d? If a move is bad, and it can be articulated why, then at any level it's potentially worth knowing, even if you lack the tactical expertise or whole board judgement (or whatever) to punish it appropriately. I appreciate that there is a concern that we should help Fedya focus on the biggest flaws, and I agree, 40 is far from the biggest flaw, but the whole forum can benefit from the discussion. So if in fact 40 is not an error, then I'd be grateful in some assistance in understanding why my impression (and explanation) is flawed.Uberdude wrote:I wouldn't worry about move 40, it's fine for a 7k and fine for a 1k.
was overly critical: it is certainly a lot better than a pass. s8 was more like a pass (but even that has a small yose value).quantumf wrote: Move 40 - I would say you are playing too close to black's thickness, and stones here are at best passes, but more likely to become problems for you later.
- quantumf
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:36 pm
- Rank: 3d
- GD Posts: 422
- KGS: komi
- Has thanked: 180 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: Not enough room to post what went wrong
Fair enough. The board is still pretty wide open, so questionable to criticize it so harshly. And I agree that overplays are perhaps justified given how far behind already was by move 40.Uberdude wrote:was overly critical: it is certainly a lot better than a pass. s8 was more like a pass (but even that has a small yose value).
In my defence, in my games, a move like that (a one space jump to the middle, very close to thickness, far away from any support) tends to result in a weak group. So in fact, 10 points worse than a pass
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Not enough room to post what went wrong
Uberdude wrote:I wouldn't worry about move 40, it's fine for a 7k and fine for a 1k.
quantumf wrote:Am I to conclude from this, by induction, that it's OK at 5d?
Ah! It seems like we agree more than I originally thought.Uberdude wrote:No I think it is probably a mistake, but I am not sure. Also playing somewhat over-ambitious moves . . . could well be a good idea in an attempt to catch up.
I still think that
A practical problem is that
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.