It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:01 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 790 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 40  Next

Who will win?
EGF pros 69%  69%  [ 40 ]
AGA pros 22%  22%  [ 13 ]
Don't know 9%  9%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 58
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #541 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 6:55 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Saying that the referee “did judge the way they expected” depends on what you consider to be a decision of judgment.

Yes, it’s true that, according to discussions that happened behind closed doors, it appears that the referee had a change of heart. According to Hajin, this was due to added information that the referee received.

But the fact of the matter is, no official judgment was made until the end when the decision was announced to the public. If the referee now changed the judgment after the public announcement, that’d be a different story.



The stuff that happened before the public announcement was not made public, so if we want to speculate about the decision making process, we have to go off of rumors or what interested parties have told us.

In my view, there was a single ruling - the one that was officially announced. How they got there has been partially described, but we are really just gossiping about it since we aren’t part of the discussion.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #542 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 6:58 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Javaness2 wrote:
Kirby wrote:
The way I understand it, the referee's interpretation was that Mateusz knew that he was experiencing significant lag on a regular basis - enough to lose byo-yomi periods in games.


It is good that you are able to understand something from the referee's statement.
Both the AGA and the EGF have a tradition of an appeals committee. Will they now institute one?
The AGA has overruled KGS server rules before. The EGF has never had the opportunity to. What will they decide there?
Will they decide to connect referee and proctors over skype?
Will they decide that the referee should watch the game?
Will they decide that a byoyomi period lost via lag can be reclaimed? (Both the AGA and EGF support immediate protests related to clock malfunctions in any one game)


I hope we get the chance to meet in person someday, Javaness - I think we’d be friends :-)

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #543 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:17 am 
Beginner

Posts: 4
Location: Luxembourg
Liked others: 3
Was liked: 6
Rank: EGF 6 dan
Kirby wrote:
Yes, it’s true that, according to discussions that happened behind closed doors, it appears that the referee had a change of heart. According to Hajin, this was due to added information that the referee received.
It is that added information that I would like to know. This case is so clear-cut that I really can't see how there could be relevant information that was not known the moment the proctor confirmed that Mateusz made his move in time.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #544 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:45 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
Laurent wrote:
Kirby wrote:
Yes, it’s true that, according to discussions that happened behind closed doors, it appears that the referee had a change of heart. According to Hajin, this was due to added information that the referee received.
It is that added information that I would like to know. This case is so clear-cut that I really can't see how there could be relevant information that was not known the moment the proctor confirmed that Mateusz made his move in time.


Ok. IMO, the issue is more polarizing than clear cut - almost like politics or religion. Yours is one perspective that many share. This thread shows evidence that it’s not the only perspective.

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #545 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 9:06 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Laurent wrote:
Kirby wrote:
Yes, it’s true that, according to discussions that happened behind closed doors, it appears that the referee had a change of heart. According to Hajin, this was due to added information that the referee received.
It is that added information that I would like to know. This case is so clear-cut that I really can't see how there could be relevant information that was not known the moment the proctor confirmed that Mateusz made his move in time.


First, according to the conditions of contest, written or not, Mateusz did not make his move in time, since the official record of time was kept by KGS. (A lousy decision by the organizers, IMHO.) OC, the referee could have overruled the official record, and apparently did so at first. The referee has a good deal of discretion.

As for what the added information was, which should have been discovered before the initial ruling, I don't think has been revealed, but is easy to guess, given a principle that referees and TDs follow in a number of games and sports. The principle in question is that players have a responsibility to protect themselves.

For instance, suppose that I am playing a ko fight and the opponent takes the ko back without playing a ko threat. We have both been lost in thought and I play a threat and then take the ko back. At this point I realize what happened and call the TD. The TD rules, correctly, in accordance with that principle, that by continuing to play after my opponent took the ko back I tacitly condoned his infraction, and have no recourse.

In this case, Mateusz continued to play with serious net lag for a long time, without complaining to the referee or organizers or asking for relief. That is the new information that could have affected the ruling, as it can be construed that by doing so he accepted the KGS time record as authoritative, even with netlag. OC, one can argue that each instance of net lag was a new irregularity, but the referee need not accept that argument.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


This post by Bill Spight was liked by: Kirby
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #546 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 10:18 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 127
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 21
Rank: KGS 1d
Bill Spight wrote:
First, according to the conditions of contest, written or not, Mateusz did not make his move in time,


Ah, so there are some unwritten conditions?

According to rules that are written (japanese rules), Mateusz did made a move (as was corroborated by his proctors), but KGS server failed to recognize that.Referee job was very simple, to question proctors and outrule KGS fail.I guess we will ping-pong that matter all the way, till some admin/mod will close this topic.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #547 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 10:37 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 57
Location: Zapadlá Lhota
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 18
GD Posts: 50
Laurent wrote:
That's why I would really like to know what arguments this protest contained, that made the referee change his mind?
So far, I only found things like "it was not the job of the proctor to control time" or "Mateusz should have complained earlier about lag-issues"
There might be another argument hidden in the post of Hajin Lee on facebook:
viewtopic.php?p=244202#p244202

edit:
AloneAgainstAll wrote:
Ah, so there are some unwritten conditions?
Probably not. At least I deduced it from a post of Justin Teng:
viewtopic.php?p=244736#p244736
"I think the main conclusions that should be drawn from this whole situation are that detailed tournament rules should be in place from the beginning"

(It looks Justin Teng is well informed and has a direct connection to the AGA team. He was able to correct statements of Mateusz Surma:
viewtopic.php?p=244744#p244744 )

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #548 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 11:31 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
AloneAgainstAll wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
First, according to the conditions of contest, written or not, Mateusz did not make his move in time,


Ah, so there are some unwritten conditions?


Could be. After a few moves it would be apparent to all that KGS was keeping the time. No need to write that condition down.

Quote:
According to rules that are written (japanese rules), Mateusz did made a move (as was corroborated by his proctors), but KGS server failed to recognize that.


I don't know about that. It is apparent that he made a move, but it is also apparent that he did not make it in time to prevent his byoyomi period from expiring on KGS.

Quote:
Referee job was very simple, to question proctors and outrule KGS fail.I guess we will ping-pong that matter all the way, till some admin/mod will close this topic.


As far as I am concerned, I have no dog in this fight. But as a TD, I have a good idea what may have happened, and I can share that. :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #549 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:50 pm 
Lives in gote

Posts: 388
Liked others: 416
Was liked: 198
Bill Spight wrote:


Quote:
Referee job was very simple, to question proctors and outrule KGS fail.I guess we will ping-pong that matter all the way, till some admin/mod will close this topic.


As far as I am concerned, I have no dog in this fight. But as a TD, I have a good idea what may have happened, and I can share that. :)


So, what may have happened? :-)


This post by sorin was liked by: Javaness2
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #550 Posted: Sat May 18, 2019 11:02 pm 
Judan
User avatar

Posts: 5539
Location: Banbeck Vale
Liked others: 1103
Was liked: 1456
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Bill Spight wrote:
...

For instance, suppose that I am playing a ko fight and the opponent takes the ko back without playing a ko threat. We have both been lost in thought and I play a threat and then take the ko back. At this point I realize what happened and call the TD. The TD rules, correctly, in accordance with that principle, that by continuing to play after my opponent took the ko back I tacitly condoned his infraction, and have no recourse.

In this case, Mateusz continued to play with serious net lag for a long time, without complaining to the referee or organizers or asking for relief. That is the new information that could have affected the ruling, as it can be construed that by doing so he accepted the KGS time record as authoritative, even with netlag. OC, one can argue that each instance of net lag was a new irregularity, but the referee need not accept that argument.


So..let me extrapolate on this idea...

Assume that someday I should happen to play in some event in which Kim is the referee, and I happen to play the same player twice ( maybe the second game is a playoff game ). And further assume that in the first game I take a ko without making a ko threat, and my opponent does not notice, and I get away with it. My opponent realizes that I have snookered him, and that a complaint would not change the result, so he does not complain.

Continuing this line of assumptions: in the playoff game, I try it again, and this time my opponent realizes it before he makes his move. He insists that I have made an illegal move. He calls the TD over to the board. Kim listens to both sides, and says 'You know by now that Joaz cheats, and you didn't complain last time, so his move is okay."
My opponent is disgusted, but he respects the decision and makes his ko threat, I defend, and he takes the ko. I again take back without making a threat. Again he calls over the TD. Again, Kim tells him that he missed his chance. So I win the ko, and the game.

It seems logical to me. :-?

_________________
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207


This post by Joaz Banbeck was liked by 3 people: Javaness2, silk, Waylon
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #551 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 12:15 am 
Dies in gote

Posts: 57
Location: Zapadlá Lhota
Liked others: 11
Was liked: 18
GD Posts: 50
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
In this case, Mateusz continued to play with serious net lag for a long time, without complaining to the referee or organizers or asking for relief. ... it can be construed that by doing so he accepted the KGS time record as authoritative, even with netlag.

So..let me extrapolate on this idea...
:-) Joaz Banbeck made a good point.

But let us analyze it a bit more:

Let us think about reasons how a referee may reject a complaint:
a) You didn't complain before, so you accepted status quo
b) You didn't complain before, otherwise we could provide treatment for the problem
c) You didn't complain in time, you ask to nullify one half of the game

Now let us stock up some examples
1) the example of taking ko too early, in same game, by Bill Spight
2) the example of taking ko too early, in another game, by Joaz Banbeck
3) the case Eric-Mateusz
4) my example that I will describe now

Imagine a classic real tournament. The organizers chose a small playing area, and so there is not enough room for tables and alleys between them. Alleys are extremely narrow. in order to walk in alleys, people must touch tables.
I am in byo-yomi, someone walks around and shoves to the table slightly. Stones shake themselves, but they stay at their intersections and I can play and press the clock in time.
Later someone walks again and shoves to the table more swiftly, all stones are moved, they must be rearranged and I cannot play within my byoyomi limit.


Now let us compare possible argumentations of a referee:

In situation 1) only c) may be applied
In situation 2) no argument may be applied. The Argument a) is invalid
Situations 3) and 4) are very similar. Myungwan applied b), but I think it has serious flaws: it was the organizers who chose KGS / a small playing area, they should expect problems with lags and people walking between tables. And players knew that organizers knew, and so it was natural that players would try to manage non-ideal circumstance by themselves, if possible

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #552 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 12:24 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Joaz Banbeck wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
...

For instance, suppose that I am playing a ko fight and the opponent takes the ko back without playing a ko threat. We have both been lost in thought and I play a threat and then take the ko back. At this point I realize what happened and call the TD. The TD rules, correctly, in accordance with that principle, that by continuing to play after my opponent took the ko back I tacitly condoned his infraction, and have no recourse.

In this case, Mateusz continued to play with serious net lag for a long time, without complaining to the referee or organizers or asking for relief. That is the new information that could have affected the ruling, as it can be construed that by doing so he accepted the KGS time record as authoritative, even with netlag. OC, one can argue that each instance of net lag was a new irregularity, but the referee need not accept that argument.


So..let me extrapolate on this idea...

Assume that someday I should happen to play in some event in which Kim is the referee, and I happen to play the same player twice ( maybe the second game is a playoff game ). And further assume that in the first game I take a ko without making a ko threat, and my opponent does not notice, and I get away with it. My opponent realizes that I have snookered him, and that a complaint would not change the result, so he does not complain.

Continuing this line of assumptions: in the playoff game, I try it again, and this time my opponent realizes it before he makes his move. He insists that I have made an illegal move. He calls the TD over to the board. Kim listens to both sides, and says 'You know by now that Joaz cheats, and you didn't complain last time, so his move is okay."


No, because making an illegal move is an infringement of the rules. Your opponent is responsible for protecting himself, but does not have the authority to change the rules. Neither does Kim. (Edit: Condoning an infringement of the rules by continuing to play does not make the next instance legal, because the rules remain the same.)

KGS is not doing anything wrong by keeping the time. Indeed, as the organizers set the tournament up (although I hope they change that before the next game) KGS was supposed to be keeping the time, regardless of netlag. The question is whether Surma accepted that condition, despite obvious and ongoing difficulties with netlag. Kim had the authority to overrule the loss on time, because of the netlag. But he had no obligation to do so.

In my opinion, had the netlag been a single incident, the principle of restoring equity would not have been in conflict with the responsibility of Surma to protect himself, because he brought the problem to the attention of the referee or organizers when it occurred. So I would have overruled the loss on time. Apparently that was the first ruling in this case, as well. But once it became clear that Surma had not brought the continuing netlag problem to the attention of either the organizers or the referee, the two principles came into conflict. OC, it was possible to regard each incident of netlag independently, but they were not really independent. Furthermore, the tournament had been set up (erroneously, IMO) without any provision for netlag. The referee's decision could go either way, but the default is not to overrule the official KGS time, and I suspect that a lot of TDs and referees would have declined to do so.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.


This post by Bill Spight was liked by: yakcyll
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #553 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:01 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
sorin wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:


Quote:
Referee job was very simple, to question proctors and outrule KGS fail.I guess we will ping-pong that matter all the way, till some admin/mod will close this topic.


As far as I am concerned, I have no dog in this fight. But as a TD, I have a good idea what may have happened, and I can share that. :)


So, what may have happened? :-)


Virtually all of my notes about this incident have addressed that question. Here is a recent one. viewtopic.php?p=244875#p244875

Kim consulted people with experience running online go tournaments. I suspect that he got advice to the effect that, by not complaining about the continuing netlag, Surma had tacitly accepted the KGS time as authoritative. The way the tournament had been set up, the KGS time was the official time.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #554 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:44 am 
Gosei

Posts: 1494
Liked others: 111
Was liked: 315
Bill Spight wrote:
by not complaining about the continuing netlag, Surma had tacitly accepted the KGS time as authoritative.


MS does not suggest that he had continuing netlag. He states that had one incident before. You are aware of that already.

We could accept the judgement that KGS's clock is the absolute truth, but clearly nobody had previously decided that they were. There is no confirmation the previous netlag incident was observed y a third party, hence it can be considered impossible to objectively rule upon. (Just like a misclick would be.) Here you had an instance where netlag was observed by a third party, it could be ruled upon. The nature of that ruling will probably only become clear when the new rules appear for the remaining matches.

_________________
North Lecale

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #555 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 5:32 am 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 77
Location: Warsaw, PL
Liked others: 165
Was liked: 18
Rank: EGF 3k
Universal go server handle: yakcyll
Javaness2 wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
by not complaining about the continuing netlag, Surma had tacitly accepted the KGS time as authoritative.


MS does not suggest that he had continuing netlag. He states that had one incident before. You are aware of that already.

That's what he meant by 'continuing netlag'. Consider the rest of Bill's argument in the light of that.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #556 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:07 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Javaness2 wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
by not complaining about the continuing netlag, Surma had tacitly accepted the KGS time as authoritative.


MS does not suggest that he had continuing netlag. He states that had one incident before. You are aware of that already.


Bill Spight wrote:
Kim consulted people with experience running online go tournaments. I suspect that he got advice to the effect that, by not complaining about the continuing netlag, Surma had tacitly accepted the KGS time as authoritative. The way the tournament had been set up, the KGS time was the official time.


Emphasis mine. By taking my quote out of context, you give the impression that it is my opinion that Surma had tacitly accepted the KGS time as authoritative. In reality I was pointing out that that could have been the conclusion of the referee, one which would have explained the final ruling.

Now, I have been under the impression, given this discussion, that Surma had been experiencing repeated netlag. For instance, in this note, viewtopic.php?p=244153#p244153 , Uberdude states:

Uberdude wrote:
As I said over on the facebook version of this thread (it's hard to keep track of all the parallel discussions!), even if you accept the argument that Mateusz should have reported a previous instance of lag (yet the referee statement refers to "continuing", is this accurate or an attempt to frame the situation as one to justify the decision?) and thus deserved to lose when he got another instance of lag at a more critical time, it leads to the following rather absurd situation:

Emphasis mine.

So it does seem that the referee thought that there was continuing netlag. What I think about that is irrelevant.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #557 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:29 am 
Gosei

Posts: 1494
Liked others: 111
Was liked: 315
Bill Spight wrote:
So it does seem that the referee thought that there was continuing netlag. What I think about that is irrelevant.


There is a disconnect between the statements of MK and MS, and this confusion is very relevant to the discussion.
In this online setup, unless you have a witness to the first loss of a byoyomi period, I don't see how you can stop the clock and report it. Post match the motivation to report it can still be low, will you risk to be seen as rubbing salt in the wounds of your opponent?
Anyway, I think that KGS timings can be used, but that proctors should be able to report on problems like the loss of the byoyomi period. That seems a practical approach to me. It's easy for the opponent to give a period back at the referee's instruction.

_________________
North Lecale

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #558 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:14 am 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 77
Location: Warsaw, PL
Liked others: 165
Was liked: 18
Rank: EGF 3k
Universal go server handle: yakcyll
Javaness2 wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
So it does seem that the referee thought that there was continuing netlag. What I think about that is irrelevant.


There is a disconnect between the statements of MK and MS, and this confusion is very relevant to the discussion.
In this online setup, unless you have a witness to the first loss of a byoyomi period, I don't see how you can stop the clock and report it. Post match the motivation to report it can still be low, will you risk to be seen as rubbing salt in the wounds of your opponent?

You do this after the game and take this up with the referee. Your next game may be on the line because of this.
Why is this even a question? I talked to a good friend of mine, who doesn't play go, about this and his conclusion was that this would never be an issue had there been a provision in the rules to inform the tournament organizers about any and all technical difficulties that arise during the course of the tournament. I admit, I was defending the final decision despite there being no such provision, because for me it's damn clear that if something out of the scope of the tournament rules can prevent me from winning, I should figure out what to do about it and let the officials know about it, not hide it thinking it will just magically go away. Admittedly, my assumption that it is a natural reaction led to my confusion with a lot of people claiming that this shouldn't have had any impact on the final decision made by Myungwan. After all, it is only an assumption and I've been biased this way, but I can't believe I'm the only one.


Last edited by yakcyll on Sun May 19, 2019 9:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

This post by yakcyll was liked by: Bill Spight
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #559 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:36 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 9545
Liked others: 1600
Was liked: 1711
KGS: Kirby
Tygem: 커비라고해
He explains an incident where he lost a byoyomi period. Did he think it was unlikely to happen again? Seems he wasn’t too concerned about it when the game result wasn’t on the line.

I don’t know if he should be required to initiate a discussion, but not doing so certainly seems risky, doesn’t it?

_________________
be immersed

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: EGF vs AGA pros win-and-continue match
Post #560 Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 9:55 am 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
Javaness2 wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
So it does seem that the referee thought that there was continuing netlag. What I think about that is irrelevant.


There is a disconnect between the statements of MK and MS, and this confusion is very relevant to the discussion.


Well, I was taught that in the case of an irregularity, the first thing for the TD or referee to do is to ascertain what happened. That obviously did not happen in this case, since, as Hajin Lee reports, new information came in with each appeal.

Quote:
In this online setup, unless you have a witness to the first loss of a byoyomi period, I don't see how you can stop the clock and report it.


If there is such a lack of mutual respect between the players and the officials that a player needs a witness to report a consequential netlag, that is a very serious problem. Stopping the clock to do so is the proper procedure, but after the match would not have been too late (Edit: that is, as far as the possibility of future netlag is concerned), as current netlag is predictive of future netlag.

Edit2: Hmmm. Maybe stopping the clock in byoyomi might not be proper, but reporting the netlag problem immediately was the thing to do.

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 790 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 40  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group