A tad too much McMahon?

General conversations about Go belong here.
Javaness2
Gosei
Posts: 1545
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:48 am
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 322 times
Contact:

Re: A tad too much McMahon?

Post by Javaness2 »

I think McMahon is a really good tournament system, it usually breaks when people don't understand how to implement it.

If you have a very small pool of players, sometimes it doesn't work that well, but I'd struggle to see what you could replace it with. For instance take a field like this over 5 rounds - 6D , 6D, 1K, 2K, 5K, 12K, 12K, 12K, 13K, 15K, 15K, 2K, 22K

It does seem interesting to experiment with using larger bands below the bar, but that's never caught on in the UK. I suggested using that to expand the number of players who could take part in the Candidates Tournament, but nobody agreed with me, and some people just mocked the idea that you could even think to do that.
Elom0
Lives in sente
Posts: 732
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2022 9:03 pm
Rank: BGA 3 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Elom, Windnwater
OGS: Elom, Elom0
Online playing schedule: The OGS data looks pretty so I'll pause for now before I change it.
Has thanked: 1028 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: A tad too much McMahon?

Post by Elom0 »

Actually in Fenrings's example I don't think it's possible for A to end up with less points than B. D has at least 1 point, B has 2 points, A has 3 points, 1+2+3=6. E has 1 point at most, F 1 point at most, and B has 2 points. 1+1+2=4 points. So it's not possible for A to lose.

I'm also thinking of a completely different idea!

Use McMahon for pairing only, with the results determined based on the Sum Of Defeated Opponent's Score's: each players opponents are ordered from the player with the highest McMahon to the lowest. The McMahon of each opponent is divided by the number of their rank down the list, and then the divided scores are added up to get the adjusted SODOS which determines the winner!!!

edit: I definitely think that the correct way to use McMahon is the prioritise the SODOS and SODOSODOS and so on, ignoring SOS which is useless in McMahon but useful for Swiss. SOS doesn't make any sense whatsoever as a tiebreaker in McMahon. SOS is for Swiss tournaments. The entire point of McMahon is essentially to replace the need for SOS or SOSOS and use SODOS and SODOSODOS instead. The main function of McMahon is to preset people's SOS according to their rank that represents the previous average level of their play. Which means SOS is terrible at scoring for people who do very well on the day or have an off-day. SOS works for Swiss tournaments where you might randomly meet opponents of very different rank in the early rounds, but in McMahon it's the opposite so SOS has a negative effect in deciding the points. Here SODOS is the obvious choice instead, haha :lol:!
Last edited by Elom0 on Tue Jan 17, 2023 12:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
gennan
Lives in gote
Posts: 497
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 2:08 am
Rank: EGF 3d
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: gennan
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 273 times
Been thanked: 147 times

Re: A tad too much McMahon?

Post by gennan »

Fenring wrote:And i don't know why this system is not in the european rating system.
Inertia, I suppose. I think that such a change would need to be called for by some bid in the AGM, which requires some determined people that are backed by some EGF member countries.
The 2021 update of the European rating system took almost 2 years from proposal to implementation.
Post Reply