Life In 19x19

For desktop Tsumego I also like http://www.321go.org/. It’s in Dutch but very easy to understand even if you (like me) hardly know any Nederlands.

Bonobo wrote:For desktop Tsumego I also like http://www.321go.org/. It’s in Dutch but very easy to understand even if you (like me) hardly know any Nederlands.

You can click the little British flag to get the site's English translation.

Boidhre wrote:

Bonobo wrote:For desktop Tsumego I also like http://www.321go.org/. It’s in Dutch but very easy to understand even if you (like me) hardly know any Nederlands.

You can click the little British flag to get the site's English translation.

Uhm … -> -> -> -> thank you

Bonobo wrote:Uhm … -> -> -> -> thank you

Besides, it's also available in German (and a few other languages as well).

However since the Dutch version is the primary version, the latest tsumego and course chapters are probably only available in Dutch.

Bonobo wrote:For desktop Tsumego I also like http://www.321go.org/. It’s in Dutch but very easy to understand even if you (like me) hardly know any Nederlands.

Thx. I'll check it out.

In a last couple of days, I'm pretty happy with my win/lose record, but terribly unhappy with my Go.
I still make tremendous mistakes and I win only because my opponents make even worse.
Constantly, I've got a feeling that I cheat on my rank graph, since I was supposed to be crushed in numerous games I won if only my opponents were a little bit better.
I don't know if it's bad because I've got the feeling that I'm worse that graph shows or good because I'm aware of my weakneses.

vpopovic wrote:In a last couple of days, I'm pretty happy with my win/lose record, but terribly unhappy with my Go.
I still make tremendous mistakes and I win only because my opponents make even worse.

If your opponents play perfectly, you will lose every game.

Constantly, I've got a feeling that I cheat on my rank graph, since I was supposed to be crushed in numerous games I won if only my opponents were a little bit better.
I don't know if it's bad because I've got the feeling that I'm worse that graph shows or good because I'm aware of my weakneses.

Given your program of rapid advancement, it is best to consider ranks as milestones along the way. Any attempt to identify yourself as actually being this or that rank will only be a hindrance. If you actually play below your rank, you will lose, if not this game, then the next, don't worry about that.

Edit: And besides, what are you doing playing weak opponents?

Bill Spight wrote: Edit: And besides, what are you doing playing weak opponents?

Everyday I, for some reason, postpone my handicap study. Without that, I simply fear to face stronger opponents.

And, to be perfectly honest, I'm also afraid what is certain losing strike with stronger opponents going to do to my rank graph. There, I said it. I know it's wrong but I'm so fond of that graph going up, up and up.
Stupid, isn't it?

vpopovic wrote:Everyday I, for some reason, postpone my handicap study. Without that, I simply fear to face stronger opponents.

Do you mean that you postpone studying how to play handicap games, or that you postpone playing handicap games (or both)?

Based on my (brief) experience as someone around your level, I wouldn't worry as much about studying handicap-specific strategies before playing some handicap games--that will help you get over the fear factor, and once you do, playing stronger opponents is great! Nothing like it for learning that what you thought was your territory is actually 90% reduceable and still having a game you've got a chance of winning.

Ok. I promise to myself now to play at least one game per day with much stronger opponent, if I manage to find one willing to play with me.
This strategy of public promises seems to work

vpopovic wrote:

Bill Spight wrote: Edit: And besides, what are you doing playing weak opponents?

Everyday I, for some reason, postpone my handicap study. Without that, I simply fear to face stronger opponents.

No problem. Don't take a handicap.

And, to be perfectly honest, I'm also afraid what is certain losing strike with stronger opponents going to do to my rank graph. There, I said it. I know it's wrong but I'm so fond of that graph going up, up and up.
Stupid, isn't it?

No, it's not stupid. But when you are shodan will you care what your rank graph looked like when you were 7 kyu? Let ranks be stepping stones, not stumbling blocks.

Well you can always play unrated games if you don't want to risk your rating an unfamiliar way of playing. I stopped playing rated games after becoming a 4k, and after 19 losses in a row I'm glad I did.

P.s. Try not to think of handicap games as strong player vs weak player, but rather strong position vs weak position.

Bill Spight wrote: No, it's not stupid. But when you are shodan will you care what your rank graph looked like when you were 7 kyu? Let ranks be stepping stones, not stumbling blocks.

Mr Spight, u're one in million

Splatted wrote:Well you can always play unrated games if you don't want to risk your rating an unfamiliar way of playing. I stopped playing rated games after becoming a 4k, and after 19 losses in a row I'm glad I did.

P.s. Try not to think of handicap games as strong player vs weak player, but rather strong position vs weak position.

Good idea. Unrated games till I get used to be force demonstration poligon

I'm KGS 2d, sometimes 1d, sometimes 3d, never 4d.

If you find me, don't hesitate to challenge me, I'LL accept gladly.

I also play turn-based go (correspondent go) at OGS.
(OGS rating is much harder than KGS.)

This is a very good way for a busy person who cannot take a long time for go at one time.