better lay-out indeed. thxRedundant wrote:For a derivation of the probability in the prisoner puzzle see wikipedia.
Logical puzzles
- cyclops
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 801
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:38 pm
- Rank: KGS 7 kyu forever
- GD Posts: 460
- Location: Amsterdam (NL)
- Has thanked: 353 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
- Contact:
Re: Logical puzzles
I think I am so I think I am.
- cyclops
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 801
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:38 pm
- Rank: KGS 7 kyu forever
- GD Posts: 460
- Location: Amsterdam (NL)
- Has thanked: 353 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
- Contact:
Re: Logical puzzles
a. Eugene Curtain and Max Washauer have recently proved that this solution cannot be improvedentropi wrote: 2- Is there a proof that this strategy gives the highest survival probability?
While understanding the strategy and how it works, I must admit that I don't get the feeling of it. Why would creating such a "linked list" maximise the survival probability?
Which information do you exploit for increasing the probability?
upon. ( from link.pdf )
b. Why it works. Assume two prisoners. If they choose random their chance is 25 %. If they agree upon mr one choosing the first box and mr two the second box. Now their chance is 50%. They made sure they succeed or fail together.
If you next try 4 prisoners by hand you see why it works. If they fail as team at least 3 of them has failed personally.
I think I am so I think I am.
- cyclops
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 801
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:38 pm
- Rank: KGS 7 kyu forever
- GD Posts: 460
- Location: Amsterdam (NL)
- Has thanked: 353 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
- Contact:
Re: Logical puzzles
This can be proven quite easily by induction.cyclops wrote: 1/51 + 1/52 + 1/53 + .. .. + 1/100 as the probability for failure.
Somehow this sum equals 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - 1/4 .. + 1/100.
I think I am so I think I am.