Bki's study journal
- SoDesuNe
- Gosei
- Posts: 1810
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:57 am
- Rank: KGS 1-dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 490 times
- Been thanked: 365 times
Re: Bki's study journal
Some comments with the help of Lizzie : )
In general and especially in games with stones on the 3-4 points, it is important to play fast and active. Prevent an enclosure, but don't necessarily play on after approaching.
In general and especially in games with stones on the 3-4 points, it is important to play fast and active. Prevent an enclosure, but don't necessarily play on after approaching.
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
Well, we all need entertainment, and this game is one that I'm not proud of, but is ultimately amusing. I played well and was ahead by a lot, made a 20k almost game losing blunder (except that I was ahead by a lot) by missing an atari (to be fair, I was desperate in having another close group live, but still that was terrible), compounded that by more (if lesser) mistakes and then only won because of my opponent making a more subtle (but still very big) blunder.
- Attachments
-
- mlbki-obataisao-2019-08-20.sgf
- (3.87 KiB) Downloaded 771 times
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
Another day, another game. I think the ko at 112 was a mistake, or at least I mismanaged the follow up and feel I didn't get enough profit from the bullying of the C8 group that resulted to compensate from the loss on the lower side. This being the case, w106 was a mistake and should have been at L5... Or rather the mistake might have been w116, I should have connected. But that comes only because b115 was a mistake, and he should have played L2, then I don't have the threat of N6 anymore.
w168 and w170 were unnecessary and should have been somewhere profitable.
Some other comments in the sgf.
w168 and w170 were unnecessary and should have been somewhere profitable.
Some other comments in the sgf.
- Attachments
-
- mlbki-ggooii-2019-08-21.sgf
- (3.01 KiB) Downloaded 773 times
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
Having see the AI recommend the move, I've tried
I overplayed in the top left and should have died with one of my two groups.
b109 might have been better at k10.
- Attachments
-
- td78032-mlbki-2019-08-23.sgf
- (3.56 KiB) Downloaded 786 times
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
I've been thinking that I should put myself more often in situation where I have to live in a precarious situation. The reason for that being that I've played quite a fair amount of games that I won because I killed an unreasonable opponent, but basically none that I won because I've skillfully created a living group in my opponent's sphere of influence. Still, it's not easy to think about this during game especially since the opportunity doesn't always arise, and my instincts tend to go more for the extraneous defensive move
Today thought I had this game. I'm not sure I needed to invade and live and could probably have reduced and reduced and won through the early kill. But his lower side was pretty big so maybe.
First there was b109. I was never worried about this living, but living without losing a lot at the top (and especially without reviving white's dead group) needed some attention.
Then b171 was almost certainly a huge overplay. I had M2, E7 to reduce (as well as the endgame hane connects) and probably could have gotten somewhere with a reduction at around k6-7. White 182 was a mistake (should have been k3) that let me get J4 in sente. Then white 194 at G6 and I have one eye but getting the second might be a bit tricky. Instead my opponent's move was like the one move that helped me live the most.
...Well I guess this mean this game is anything but an example of living skillfully
.
After that my opponent completely self destructed in the endgame. See w220 for example. But I was winning solidly anyway.
Today thought I had this game. I'm not sure I needed to invade and live and could probably have reduced and reduced and won through the early kill. But his lower side was pretty big so maybe.
First there was b109. I was never worried about this living, but living without losing a lot at the top (and especially without reviving white's dead group) needed some attention.
Then b171 was almost certainly a huge overplay. I had M2, E7 to reduce (as well as the endgame hane connects) and probably could have gotten somewhere with a reduction at around k6-7. White 182 was a mistake (should have been k3) that let me get J4 in sente. Then white 194 at G6 and I have one eye but getting the second might be a bit tricky. Instead my opponent's move was like the one move that helped me live the most.
...Well I guess this mean this game is anything but an example of living skillfully
After that my opponent completely self destructed in the endgame. See w220 for example. But I was winning solidly anyway.
- Attachments
-
- aIGO-mlbki-2019-08-24.sgf
- (1.82 KiB) Downloaded 733 times
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
- ez4u
- Oza
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
- Rank: Jp 6 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: ez4u
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
- Has thanked: 2351 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
Re: Bki's study journal
Consider that you may already have learned the most valuable lesson. You have had your success against unreasonable opponents (in other words, opponents that exposed themselves to too precarious situations). Emulating them (particularly the dying part) is not the way to consistently win at Go. Strong players may appear to be in precarious situations but the reason that they are strong is that they already see the way home when they decide to get into those situations.Bki wrote:I've been thinking that I should put myself more often in situation where I have to live in a precarious situation. The reason for that being that I've played quite a fair amount of games that I won because I killed an unreasonable opponent, but basically none that I won because I've skillfully created a living group in my opponent's sphere of influence...
This on the other hand is a bad habit that is worth working on. If you cannot see what the threat is, do not defend. Let your opponent demonstrate the limits of your current knowledge so that you can study the difference between necessary and unnecessary defensive moves. The next step is the difference between more and less efficient, but necessary defensive moves.... and my instincts tend to go more for the extraneous defensive move
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
Well, first I wasn't talking about doing invasions which obviously don't work but try to more often go deep when I'm unsure. The idea is less to win more games, and more to improve, because I feel that the best way to be able to get the feel about whether a group can live or not (and at what cost can it live, and whether that cost is acceptable), apart from doing lots of life and death which I am doing, is experience.ez4u wrote:Consider that you may already have learned the most valuable lesson. You have had your success against unreasonable opponents (in other words, opponents that exposed themselves to too precarious situations). Emulating them (particularly the dying part) is not the way to consistently win at Go. Strong players may appear to be in precarious situations but the reason that they are strong is that they already see the way home when they decide to get into those situations.Bki wrote:I've been thinking that I should put myself more often in situation where I have to live in a precarious situation. The reason for that being that I've played quite a fair amount of games that I won because I killed an unreasonable opponent, but basically none that I won because I've skillfully created a living group in my opponent's sphere of influence...
This on the other hand is a bad habit that is worth working on. If you cannot see what the threat is, do not defend. Let your opponent demonstrate the limits of your current knowledge so that you can study the difference between necessary and unnecessary defensive moves. The next step is the difference between more and less efficient, but necessary defensive moves.... and my instincts tend to go more for the extraneous defensive move
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
In this game I avoided going into the troubles of living (even if looking at it now, I think I could easily have done so) and just sacrificed a bunch of stone for a reduction that left me ahead by a lot thanks to an earlier kill.
The opening up to
left me very satisfied. It's effectively as if he let me have 3 corners and my position on the right was nice. I'm not sure if the turn at
was the right move, but his immediate cut let me develop on the bottom as well as solidify the right into solid territory, so I think it's fine even had I failed to kill the group later.
I've made it my habit to "punish" this large knight by the 3-3 invasion (well it's probably not a real punishment, but there's no way I can accept giving him a "basically the same as for the small knight, but better for black" by sliding, and I know there's also complicated variation that can arise from this move but have no clue about them).
Not sure about
. I don't mind the result that followed from
but it did left me with no base and eyes even if the group has enough liberty and space that it's not going to die.
White 112 was amusing since black 111 didn't actually break the ladder. But just ensuring the kill was good enough to win anyway.
Also given that I get the descent at B6 is sente, I might have connected with White 122 and tried to live on this side. Though maybe a move at around C8 would have been awkward to answer.
White 152 at J19 might have been better.
The opening up to
Not sure about
White 112 was amusing since black 111 didn't actually break the ladder. But just ensuring the kill was good enough to win anyway.
Also given that I get the descent at B6 is sente, I might have connected with White 122 and tried to live on this side. Though maybe a move at around C8 would have been awkward to answer.
White 152 at J19 might have been better.
- Attachments
-
- mlbki-meiwa1234-2019-08-26.sgf
- (2.31 KiB) Downloaded 741 times
- Knotwilg
- Oza
- Posts: 2432
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:53 am
- Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Artevelde
- OGS: Knotwilg
- Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
- Location: Ghent, Belgium
- Has thanked: 360 times
- Been thanked: 1021 times
- Contact:
Re: Bki's study journal
I think defending on the left with a hanging connection is better here. The turn at the bottom puts no pressure on Black's corner group, so its function is reduced to influencing bottom and centre. The hanging connection provides strength for the group, influencing the right side.Bki wrote: I'm not sure if the turn atwas the right move
Locally yes, but your group at the bottom is not very strong. Giving Black strong influence as a result of the corner invasion, is dangerous in this position (as is shown later)Bki wrote:I've made it my habit to "punish" this large knight by the 3-3 invasion
Overall, impressive fighting, good direction of play, good shapes and tactics. Nice win!
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Bki's study journal
Your instinct to "punish" the large knight's extension in this case is a good one. But isn't E-03 better than C-03? It threatens to connect to your stones on the right. Sure, the fight can get complicated, but White has the advantage with so many stones locally. Don't avoid a fight where you are strong.Bki wrote:I've made it my habit to "punish" this large knight by the 3-3 invasion (well it's probably not a real punishment, but there's no way I can accept giving him a "basically the same as for the small knight, but better for black" by sliding, and I know there's also complicated variation that can arise from this move but have no clue about them).
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
An interesting possibility Bill, but I'm a bit wary I might end up hurting my bottom side group instead.
Anyway, looking at some variation for the large knight move, I found this intriguing idea :
would normally be a trick play, refuted by D6, and after white cut the fight is in black's favour. But on this board the triangled stone is quite nicely placed to make the cut a lot more severe.
Let's look at it a bit more.
...Or maybe my bottom group is just too weak to handle this fight. Ah well. It was interesting thinking about it anyway.
Anyway, looking at some variation for the large knight move, I found this intriguing idea :
Let's look at it a bit more.
...Or maybe my bottom group is just too weak to handle this fight. Ah well. It was interesting thinking about it anyway.
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
I've finally decided on a way to go through the Segoe tesuji dictionary that satisfy me. After my first pass through all the C problems, I'm currently going over it again skipping only the A level ones. I spend 3 minutes on each problem, doing around 10-20 problems per session. I will note some of the problems that I failed so that I can play it over my board later. I do so when :
1 - I completely missed the idea of the problem.
2 - I completely missed one of the possible defense given in the solution.
3 - I was bothered by a possible defense that isn't in the solution and so need more time to figure out.
4 - The problem was just that interesting.
As for L&D problems, I've finished going through the elementary series of the Cho chikun's encyclopedia of life and death for the second time. Rather than immediately start a third, I've finished GGPfB vol 3 that was in my "read it when I want to do more problem" list, then went through the level 3 of the korean go problem academy, and I think I will start GGPfB vol 4.
As for games, here two I played today :
1 - I completely missed the idea of the problem.
2 - I completely missed one of the possible defense given in the solution.
3 - I was bothered by a possible defense that isn't in the solution and so need more time to figure out.
4 - The problem was just that interesting.
As for L&D problems, I've finished going through the elementary series of the Cho chikun's encyclopedia of life and death for the second time. Rather than immediately start a third, I've finished GGPfB vol 3 that was in my "read it when I want to do more problem" list, then went through the level 3 of the korean go problem academy, and I think I will start GGPfB vol 4.
As for games, here two I played today :
- Attachments
-
- SFERZTREUF.sgf
- (6.07 KiB) Downloaded 730 times
-
- UEZSMRDZGK.sgf
- (6.55 KiB) Downloaded 702 times
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
So, I won this game because of an amazing ko-phobia by my opponent :
There should have been no reason for him to not take the ko at least once.
There should have been no reason for him to not take the ko at least once.
- Attachments
-
- hasy07-mlbki-2019-08-28.sgf
- (1.75 KiB) Downloaded 740 times
-
Bki
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:59 am
- Rank: IGS 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Bki
- IGS: mlbki
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Re: Bki's study journal
This game was notable in that for some reason I was persuaded the reverse komi was against me (and that I would lose) until the game went to counting.
I badly handled the left side invasion but my opponent did worse so I lived there. Then I got a pretty good result on the right that I threw away by a mindless corner sac by trying too hard to kill. I could just have chased from behind or even just solidified the corner, but no.
I badly handled the left side invasion but my opponent did worse so I lived there. Then I got a pretty good result on the right that I threw away by a mindless corner sac by trying too hard to kill. I could just have chased from behind or even just solidified the corner, but no.