Alternate goals and alternate aims of rating systems

General conversations about Go belong here.
User avatar
ez4u
Oza
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
Rank: Jp 6 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: ez4u
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 2351 times
Been thanked: 1332 times

Re: Alternate goals and alternate aims of rating systems

Post by ez4u »

pwaldron wrote:
Several years ago there was a good article in the Nordic Go Journal about the time evolution of people's ratings. It turns out that the data was well fit by a decaying exponential towards a terminal strength. If you're looking to predict peak rating then one way would be to fit the data we do have on a player's rating and extract the terminal strength value.

The article 'Search for a Universal Rating Progress Function' in this issue?
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
Post Reply