Page 2 of 7
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:45 am
by illluck
Oca, you need to try against a white which can give you 9 stones with traditional placement in order to get a feel of how each position works for you.
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:47 am
by logan
How about these two oca?
$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , X . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . X , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:50 am
by illluck
Edit: of course, the below is probably strictly better than the above:
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:02 am
by oca
illluck wrote:Oca, you need to try against a white which can give you 9 stones with traditional placement in order to get a feel of how each position works for you.
I went to the same conclusion
here is the standard nine stone (I let the 6.5 komi so that I have the same condition then with the two first game)
(;GM[1]FF[4]SZ[19]AP[SmartGo Kifu:3.3]CA[utf-8]
GN[2014-04-26c]
PW[SmartGo]
PB[oca]
DT[2014-04-26]
KM[6.5]
RE[B+R]
RU[AGA (Règle Chinoise)]
AB[dd][jd][pd][dj][jj][pj][dp][jp][pp];B[];W[do];B[cp];W[ej];B[cl];W[bl]
;B[bk];W[cm];B[bm];W[lq];B[kq];W[dl];B[ck];W[qn];B[qo];W[bn];B[al];W[le]
;B[lc];W[dg];B[ch];W[eo];B[gq];W[md];B[nc];W[kc];B[jc];W[kp];B[jq];W[mc]
;B[mb];W[lb];B[kb];W[nb];B[la];W[ma];B[ob];W[jo];B[na];W[rn];B[ro];W[iq]
;B[ip];W[lp];B[hp];W[ql];B[nq];W[lr];B[kr];W[cj];B[di];W[on];B[no];W[ls]
;B[ks];W[lj];B[ko];W[lo];B[kn];W[hn];B[ln];W[gr];B[hr];W[mn];B[mo];W[nr]
;B[or];W[lm];B[in];W[jn];B[km];W[mq];B[jm];W[io];B[ho];W[oq];B[np];W[bo]
;B[ns];W[ms];B[mr];W[od];B[mp];W[bh];B[bi];RW[])
so far that still big block in the center that was the more confortable for me (but it is 10 stones.. not 9)
I feeled quite the same with your proposition and the standard one.
very weird

and

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:05 am
by oca
I will call that one "the rotor" I like it very much and will play it next.
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:09 am
by oca
Here is the rotor, which was quite easy but a lot of fun, it forced me to play more agressivly then I normaly do.
and the "HI" one which was way more difficult for me... but finish with a nice ladder and net
I finally won but I had to play the "back" button a few times

Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:13 am
by illluck
The key for comparison is that white has to be strong enough to give 9 stones in the first place. I'd be happy to take a stab as white to try a few games with the various openings. 9 stones might not be the correct handicap between us, but I think it may be more illustrative than games against SmartGo.
@DrStraw: You may be right, I suspect I can probably play the average pro with 6-8 stones (ignoring the young pros who are very very close to top level when they qualified). You are probably stronger than me on regular time as I play a lot of blitz. On the other hand, I think also that pros generally don't play the type of bullying moves required for high handicap games - I've heard of a Chinese amateur 7d (i.e. someone who has performed very well at national-level amateur tournaments - stronger than the average KGS 9d) being beaten down to 5 stones by 宋雪林 9p (who, incidentally, lost against Yu Zhiying when she was 13).
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:22 am
by oca
illluck wrote: I'd be happy to take a stab as white to try a few games with the various openings. 9 stones might not be the correct handicap between us, but I think it may be more illustrative than games against SmartGo.
Fantastic ! maybe we can start with this one, it's ten stones... is it ok for you ?
$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . X , X . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . X . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . X , X . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . X X X . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:36 am
by illluck
Sure. Would you prefer a malkovich or a game on OGS instead (that way if we are both on we can play at a real-time pace)?
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:36 am
by illluck
Sure. Would you prefer a malkovich or a game on OGS instead (that way if we are both on we can play at a real-time pace)?
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:57 am
by Abyssinica
If I could place the 9 stones where I wanted, I would do this:
$$
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . B . . . . . B . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . B . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . B . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . B . . . . . B . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . B . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . B . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
(Why doesn't my code have a top border?)
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:06 am
by oca
Abyssinica wrote:(Why doesn't my code have a top border?)
top border cannot be on the first line which is for comment
you need something like that :
[go]$$ the first line is for comments
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:08 am
by oca
illluck wrote:Sure. Would you prefer a malkovich or a game on OGS instead (that way if we are both on we can play at a real-time pace)?
I would prefer a malkovich, as I have plenty of time, but not in one block (other said, I have two children...

)
Could you set it up ? I don't know the exact procedure yet...
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:12 am
by Abyssinica
oca wrote:Abyssinica wrote:(Why doesn't my code have a top border?)
top border cannot be on the first line which is for comment
you need something like that :
[go]$$ the first line is for comments
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
That helped. What do you think about my 9 stone handicap idea?
Re: Non standard 9 or 10 stones handicap placement
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:17 am
by oca
Abyssinica wrote:What do you think about my 9 stone handicap idea?
I like it, it is really close to what I did against the guy who let me play the game.
but I lose the game as he was able to kill a big group of my stones... still a very strong one I think