Re: Comapny Like Shodan Imports
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 10:29 am
Honkaya is mostly from China and there is much more availability. Hyuga Kaya is a rare resource now.
Life in 19x19. Go, Weiqi, Baduk... Thats the life.
https://lifein19x19.com/
That is precisely why I am confused. It seems natural that the rarer wood would be more expensive and be used to make premium boards only, making fewer boards with thicker cuts and being able to charge a lot for them.oren wrote:Honkaya is mostly from China and there is much more availability. Hyuga Kaya is a rare resource now.
If you look at the boards, the hyuga kaya ones are all thinner and have less desirable (itame) cuts, as compared with the various masame cuts in the honkaya boards. If you look at the table boards as well, the hyuga kaya ones tend to be constructed from more pieces, which is why they are cheaper.DJLLAP wrote:That is precisely why I am confused. It seems natural that the rarer wood would be more expensive and be used to make premium boards only, making fewer boards with thicker cuts and being able to charge a lot for them.oren wrote:Honkaya is mostly from China and there is much more availability. Hyuga Kaya is a rare resource now.
They are being used for premium boards and they put the cuts together with the availability they have. I'm confused on your confusion.DJLLAP wrote: That is precisely why I am confused. It seems natural that the rarer wood would be more expensive and be used to make premium boards only, making fewer boards with thicker cuts and being able to charge a lot for them.
Honkaya is used for genuine kaya from anywhere except from Miyazaki prefecture (called Hyuga in the past) so there is honkaya from Japan. To connoisseurs of kaya it is felt that honkaya is generally of lower quality compared to Hyuga kaya. However there is better and worse within any category of kaya, so some honkaya from somewhere other than Hyuga might be "better" than some boards made from Hyuga kaya. Many factors go into judging quality such as absence of flaws, color, coarseness of grain, straightness of the grain, and not least the skill of the maker. Thickness of the board is related to price. A thicker board will usually be more expensive than one of the same quality but less thick. 50000 yen sounds like a price of a kaya table top board. All the factors of quality could be involved, you can't just look at the thickness of the board. A board with a knot on the playing surface would be devalued compared to one with no knots. Genuine kaya is protected in Japan so kaya trees cannot be cut. New Japanese kaya lumber can only come from trees that fall over in a storm or otherwise die. Japanese katsura is becoming depleted, too, now.DJLLAP wrote:That is precisely why I am confused. It seems natural that the rarer wood would be more expensive and be used to make premium boards only, making fewer boards with thicker cuts and being able to charge a lot for them.oren wrote:Honkaya is mostly from China and there is much more availability. Hyuga Kaya is a rare resource now.
Those are actually the exact boards I was talking about. There is a pretty wide spread of prices in these gobans, but nothing in the economical range of 50,000-100,000, like they have in hyugakaya (I am only looking at floor gobans).oren wrote:http://www.kurokigoishi.co.jp/onlineshop/honkayagoban/index.html
Does this meet wide variety?
Unique they certainly are, and if you like the look & feel, nothing speaks against them; what I wrote about these stones just was the impression I got from the photos.DJLLAP wrote:Onyx stones were really an idea trying to get nice, somewhat unique stones without forking over the money for slate and shell stones.Bonobo wrote:For my taste the onyx stones are also a little bit too shiny/glossy, I’d be afraid they’d also be to slippery when placing them. They seem … cold.
Mh… not sure about that. I’d ask Mr. Kuroki or that other vendor whether they have some stones for a smaller budget, I’ve also seen that Mr. Kuroki sometimes offers specially priced stones in his “outlet” (if I understand correctly).Even the lowest grade slate and shell stones are quite expensive if you want them to be decent sized.
Good glass stones would be OK, I think. I have an elderly (perhaps 40 years) Katsura floor goban on which my glass stones look quite good, though meanwhile I prefer playing with my (likewise elderly) shell and slate stones, even though they probably are of the least quality available. (I was lucky to buy both from a friend for a good used price a few years ago.)What kind of stones do you think are nice enough to play with on a good goban excluding shell stones? Maybe glass?
Yes, that would be very poor quality.I have one set of glass stones that has quite a lot of stones that are not properly centered (?), i.e. when they lay on the board they are tilted.
I’m envious already.DJLLAP wrote:[..]
What do you guys think of this set?
Bonobo wrote: