IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test

All non-Go discussions should go here.
User avatar
Phelan
Gosei
Posts: 1449
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:15 pm
Rank: KGS 6k
GD Posts: 892
Has thanked: 1550 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test

Post by Phelan »

hyperpape wrote:It's what we are--the human type of chimp ;-) .

I seem to recall there being a biologist or primatologist who referred to us as the third species of chimpanzee.

Pan Narrans, the Storytelling Chimp.
a1h1 [1d]: You just need to curse the gods and defend.
Good Go = Shape.
Associação Portuguesa de Go
User avatar
Fedya
Lives in gote
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:21 pm
Rank: 6-7k KGS
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 139 times

Re:

Post by Fedya »

EdLee wrote:
fwiffo wrote:I wonder if he'd still win if they eliminated the buzzer as a factor.
How do you mean? I thought they built a mechanical buzzer for Watson so Watson had to buzz just like all the human contestants.
The same buzzer rules applied to Watson, too.

Watson's relay presumably operates at whatever speed electrons in a current can move, which is relatively close to c. That would be much faster than human reflexes.
User avatar
fwiffo
Gosei
Posts: 1435
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
Location: California
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 168 times

Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test

Post by fwiffo »

Watson's mechanical solenoid finger has better reflexes than a human finger. That doesn't tell us anything about AI - just that we can build mechanical things that are better than humans at some tasks, which we already knew.

I'm suggesting that you could ask every clue in the format of Final Jeopardy, where all the players answered and the buzzer isn't a factor. That would be a more interesting test of its language understanding and answering ability.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Re:

Post by Bill Spight »

Fedya wrote:
EdLee wrote:
fwiffo wrote:I wonder if he'd still win if they eliminated the buzzer as a factor.
How do you mean? I thought they built a mechanical buzzer for Watson so Watson had to buzz just like all the human contestants.
The same buzzer rules applied to Watson, too.

Watson's relay presumably operates at whatever speed electrons in a current can move, which is relatively close to c. That would be much faster than human reflexes.


A built in delay of around 0.1 sec. seems reasonable to me.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

Bill Spight wrote:A built in delay of around 0.1 sec. seems reasonable to me.
Yes, this is nice. Like finding the correct komi. They'd have to do some experiments to find out the correct delay. :ugeek:
Perhaps they had already added a delay?
hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test

Post by hyperpape »

It would be nice to know how Watson would perform in a final jeopardy like format. But from the perspective of AI research, isn't the really important thing that Watson can answer Jeopardy questions on a level roughly comparable to (very very talented) humans? Winning is just icing on the cake.

P.S. Are any of Jennings, Watson or R.whatshisname? good enough that they could just buzz in on every question and end up with a positive score? I read speculation that Jennings was intentionally buzzing in before he'd confirmed that he knew the answer, just for the sake of beating Watson to the punch.
User avatar
jts
Oza
Posts: 2664
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
Rank: kgs 6k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test

Post by jts »

hyperpape wrote:It would be nice to know how Watson would perform in a final jeopardy like format. But from the perspective of AI research, isn't the really important thing that Watson can answer Jeopardy questions on a level roughly comparable to (very very talented) humans? Winning is just icing on the cake.

P.S. Are any of Jennings, Watson or R.whatshisname? good enough that they could just buzz in on every question and end up with a positive score? I read speculation that Jennings was intentionally buzzing in before he'd confirmed that he knew the answer, just for the sake of beating Watson to the punch.

In buzzer competitions you usually want to buzz in before you know the answer. Then you figure it out while they call on you.
hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test

Post by hyperpape »

That's true, but there's still some variable under the player's control here. There are questions where none of the players buzz in. They're obviously waiting for some information, at least in some categories (perhaps Jennings decides he's going to buzz in every time on the category "Biographical Facts Concerning Jennings").
ethanb
Lives in gote
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:15 am
Rank: AGA 2d
GD Posts: 0
IGS: ethanb
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Re: IBM Watson beats human champs in first public test

Post by ethanb »

hyperpape wrote:That's true, but there's still some variable under the player's control here. There are questions where none of the players buzz in. They're obviously waiting for some information, at least in some categories (perhaps Jennings decides he's going to buzz in every time on the category "Biographical Facts Concerning Jennings").


IIRC if somebody buzzes in before the (human) person behind the switch decides the question has fairly been asked, they get a 3 second penalty before they can buzz in again. If they try again before the penalty is up, they get another second or two added. Maybe the man behind the curtain was a fraction slow activating the buzzers for a question and everybody's buzzer got locked down?

Actually, I think I remember reading that Watson has an unfair advantage there too; he senses the current when his buzzer is live.
Post Reply