Page 2 of 3
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:45 pm
by Numsgil
$$Bcm17
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm17
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:51 pm
by speedchase
Is this a possibility?
$$Wcm1
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm1
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:52 pm
by shapenaji
Having studied it more, I'm more confident than ever that his pincer at "c" in the previous diagram just doesn't attack strongly
$$Bcm
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcmcontinued:
$$Bcm
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$BcmNifty huh? I live on the upper edge (treating my middle stone as a stone on the 4th line, rather than on the third line) and then the double hane. "a" would be typical if I was on a normal edge, but it doesn't work here. "b" is simply captured.
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:56 pm
by shapenaji
$$Wcm18
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm18
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:02 pm
by misshapenaji
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:19 pm
by Numsgil
$$Bcm19
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm19Trigger:
$$Wcm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm20Not for you:
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:34 pm
by misshapenaji
Triggered
$$Wcm30
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm30
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:08 pm
by Numsgil
$$Bcm31
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm31
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:12 pm
by shapenaji
$$Bcm31
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm31(Thanks for the flash tutorial there, couldn't get it to work)
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:20 pm
by Numsgil
$$Bcm33
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm33
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:25 pm
by shapenaji
$$Wcm34
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm34
A good pincer, hoped he would pincer a little closer, this isn't quite as pretty as the other one, but I still get life here,
I second-guessed myself a few times before deciding on playing here, it gets complicated, but it aims to make use of the strong point at "z"
$$Bcm33
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm33"a" and "b" are very easily dealt with, but "c" is complicated, and I don't know if it's worth it.
I nearly played "a" myself, but decided that this route, though more complicated, holds no danger.
$$Bcm33
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm33I think this is his best sequence, he gets life on the bottom, and I get it on the top
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:44 pm
by Numsgil
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:27 pm
by Numsgil
$$Bcm35
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm35
I'd really like to try separating his stones one way or another, but I don't see a way to do that
and make life locally. And I don't think I like the idea of running on this board. It's too easy for the attacker to make profit rather directly.
The problem is that if I play like this to try and seal white in, he gets the interior corner point. It's a rather hard stone to approach, so it makes the cross cut simply not work. I don't see any variations from this point that look appealing to me at all.
$$Bc1
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bc1Since white outnumbers me in the region, and I don't see a compelling attack line, I'll just try and make life locally, and the way to do that is by flinging stones around as attachments to shake the tree and see what falls out.
Maybe something like this as a reasonably convoluted continuation:
$$Bc1
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bc1The variations branch from here, but I won't embarrass myself by trying to show them
But I think this is reasonable.
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:01 am
by shapenaji
$$Wcm35
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm35
$$Wcm36
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm36a is also a possibility, but I like the crosscuts here, I stand by the marked move as a way out. I never see any danger in crosscuts, because essentially, if YOU are the one getting crosscut, you have flexibility to decide which side is more important.
Re: Numsgil (3k) vs shapenaji (6d) - Donut Board
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:00 am
by Numsgil
$$Bcm36
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Bcm36
