Re: Influence in go
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:23 am
Thanks, Bill! This has been interesting to follow.
Life in 19x19. Go, Weiqi, Baduk... Thats the life.
https://lifein19x19.com/
This can be done by considering both influence and efficiency.Bill Spight wrote:Influence needs to be corrected for overconcentration.
True, but slightly off the pointBill Spight wrote:I think that we can trust pro play more than we can trust the estimates.topazg wrote:I'm following this with some interest, but I do have an observation of concern on this statement (and others like it) - Without access to the discussions between professionals on the game in question, how do we know that this isn't an accurate assumption, where White's theoretical advantage was slowly removed by suboptimal play?Bill Spight wrote:Given the final result, the estimation of -9.3 seems too big for White.
If you found links back to this thread, you may have already found the link to the video at the Go Symposium website by clicking on the video link in the menu. Bill's is session 5.david_gfe_games wrote:Bill,
You mentioned your paper (Influence in Go) at the Symposium in August. All I can find is the link back to this thread. Are you papers available for download?
Well, the Power Point presentation is it. No paper. As for my other papers, I do not have web site right now. Check MSRI or Martin Mueller's site.david_gfe_games wrote:Bill,
You mentioned your paper (Influence in Go) at the Symposium in August. All I can find is the link back to this thread. Are you papers available for download?