Page 2 of 6

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 7:48 am
by Phelan
I prefer compact.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 7:48 am
by kirkmc
I think the compact is better for inline games...

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 7:55 am
by schultz
I agree. Compact would be preferable when posting the games in forum threads/posts.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:05 pm
by fwiffo
This is a test...





Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:11 pm
by yoyoma
I like full better, especially for the variation tree. Also more room to see sgf comments.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:37 pm
by kirkmc
FWIW, EidoGo displays fine on my iPad.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:55 pm
by fwiffo
yoyoma wrote:I like full better, especially for the variation tree. Also more room to see sgf comments.

Yeah, I think I'm going to leave both as an option. I like the full version myself, but it does take up a lot of room.

kirkmc wrote:FWIW, EidoGo displays fine on my iPad.

*tents fingers* Excellent...

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:57 pm
by mdobbins
kirkmc wrote:FWIW, EidoGo displays fine on my iPad.

Droid likes... 8-)

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:00 pm
by fwiffo
Indeed, Droid does (that was one I did check)!

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:10 pm
by Chew Terr
Doesn't work for the optional Opera iphone application. You can see the variations tree, but not the board itself.

It does work, however, on the default Safari iphone browser.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:25 pm
by fwiffo
Hmm, don't know if I'll be able to debug Opera for the iPhone. :? Any users of a non-phone version of Opera having any trouble?

Actually, I just realized that I'm using my enhanced version of EidoGo which has some compatibility issues with IE6. But IE6 users are a pox on the whole of the internets, so they can eat me. :twisted:

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:27 pm
by Chew Terr
I actually had to upgrade from IE6 at work, just for purposes of viewing here... heh.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:15 pm
by flOvermind
Working fine on Maemo (N900).

As you have it now, the poster can decide whether to use the small or the large version. Would it be possible to let the viewer decide which version to use? Something like a setting in the user control panel, switching between eidogo small and large (and perhaps even flash)... That way, everyone could use what works best for him.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:32 pm
by fwiffo
@flOvermind: That would actually be pretty complicated. Right now, it uses BBcodes which are restricted to a very simple search and replace. It replaces this:

Code: Select all

[eidogo](SGF_DATA)[/eidogo]

with this:

Code: Select all

<iframe src="/eidogo-phpbb3/iframe-player.html" style="width: 423px; height: 621px; border: 0; overflow: hidden;"></iframe>
<pre style="display: none;" class="eidogo-compact">(SGF_DATA)</pre>

Having it replace conditionally based on a viewer preference would involve writing some actually modifications to the forum software, which would be pretty complicated and would make it harder to maintain the forum (e.g. doing upgrades for security fixes and whatnot).

So while I can't say that it's impossible, it would probably be more trouble than it's worth.

Re: SGF VIEWER FLASHGOBAN Or EIDOGO

Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:37 pm
by flOvermind
Ok. I must confess I don't know anything about phpBB, so I don't know how extensible it is. If you need to modify the forum software to do it, then it probably isn't a good idea ;)