

zslane wrote:Or, rather, that formal clarification of the original "deal" was successfully obtained and the wishes of Iwamoto-sensei were preserved. It is unfortunate, though, that a lawsuit (or the threat of one) and a lot of bad PR had to occur in order to secure this outcome.
It seems to me that a couple of lessons can be learned from all this:
A) If one does not wish to get stung, one ought not go around knocking over hornet's nests.
B) If one wishes to remain on good terms with someone, one ought not sting them, even if they are knocking over your nest.
This is rather vague, to the point that I don't even know what you're suggesting (though perhaps AGA insiders might know).usagi wrote:From what I have read so far it looks like the Nihon Kiin went over the AGA's head in promoting go in the west.
I don't know much, but you could poke around in here: http://www.usgo.org/archive/agagobib.html, There are presumably some notices in the AGA historical book (http://www.usgo.org/archive/agahbk95.html). The old AGA journals would certainly be relevant, but they haven't been digitized. Ditto for the collection at Princeton, afaik.Where can I read more about the history of Nihon Ki-in / AGA relations? thank you.
usagi wrote:From what I have read so far it looks like the Nihon Kiin went over the AGA's head in promoting go in the west. Is this true? Not trying to stir stuff up, but I read differing stories on what happened in NYC and I want to know more about the history.
Where can I read more about the history of Nihon Ki-in / AGA relations? thank you.