Page 2 of 5
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:48 pm
by bakekoq
emeraldemon wrote: Sorry, I should have been more explicit: the stuff in hide tags isn't for players to read!
Owh. sorry, I think it's comment can help the players. btw, is it the rules here? how about the spoiler? I can't read my opponent's spoiler too?
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 6:15 pm
by emeraldemon
I probably should have written "Not for the players" in my post so you knew, but the general rule is that you can't read anything in spoiler tags unless someone writes "For bakekoq:" or something similar on it. You shouldn't read what's in your opponent's spoiler tags.
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:15 pm
by bakekoq
it's really strange. I think, this malkovich game is opened so we can know what's our opponent trying for the next moves? so, what's the purpose for the spoiler if so?
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:29 am
by opex
If it was open, there would be no need in hide tags, right?
The purpose is that you play the game as usual, but explain your reasoning, get comments on it, and after the game you reread the topic, and the hide tags become an excellent review on the game
That's how I see it.
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 7:10 am
by bakekoq
owh, I see now the process for this malkovich game.
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 5:59 am
by blindgod
bakekoq wrote: I can't read my opponent's spoiler too?
I had always taken this to be a given. To me, the info in the spoiler tags are for game observers while the game is going on, for opponents after the game is over, and for the writer down the road as a retrospective. Plus, in a game against a much stronger opponent (such as mine against EdLee), I imagine the spoilers can function as a teaching tool. At least, I hope I'll be able to learn from his commentary on my good and bad moves in my game with him (though I do intend to ask him for specific feedback once our game's over).
Anyhoo
$$Wcm10
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm10
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:41 pm
by bakekoq
$$Wcm10
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wcm10
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:36 pm
by blindgod
$$cm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$cm20
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:56 pm
by bakekoq
$$cm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$cm20
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:45 pm
by blindgod
$$cm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$cm20
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:52 pm
by bakekoq
$$cm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$cm20
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:22 pm
by blindgod
$$cm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$cm20
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 6:32 am
by bakekoq
$$cm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$cm20
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:44 am
by blindgod
$$cm20
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$cm20
Re: 168 - blindgod vs bakekoq
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:42 am
by hyperpape
bakekoq wrote: It's time to make the new moyo even though my stone's on the right side n upper side is still not safe yet.
It's time to protect your stones on the top right.
blindgod wrote: More aggressive than is common for me, but I feel it's appropriate in this case.
I think it's better to play on the outside. Here, you're just cutting off the tail of the dragon. This move is big, but you can profit more attacking the whole thing. If he connects, he loses time and your attack becomes severe. If he doesn't connect, you can always snatch the tail later, but you will have profited by attacking in the meantime.
That's how I see it.