Re: What do I have to do just to get to 5k?
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 5:10 am
The first variation is the one I tried, and I was quite surprised to see White live by playing under the stones.
Life in 19x19. Go, Weiqi, Baduk... Thats the life.
https://lifein19x19.com/
Indeed
I playedat R16 instead of Q17 because I thought the wall I would get would work better with the stone at the bottom,
Building a wall to work with my stones already on the board isn't a good idea?
I just belatedly figured this one out myself in a recent game. What you want is that wall plus a stone on the right side star point the perfect distance from the wall. But White ends the joseki in sente and is able to play at the right side star point or thereabouts before you get to it. So you want to have that point occupied already before you start (as in a sanrensei).Fedya wrote:The first thing I'll point out is that I playedat R16 instead of Q17 because I thought the wall I would get would work better with the stone at the bottom, as opposed to a wall facing the opposite direction. I was also worried about the aji of the O17 stone. (Yes, I know, you're all going to tell me not to be fearful of the aji of my opponents' dead stones.)
I hope that is not the lesson you learned.Building a wall to work with my stones already on the board isn't a good idea?
When I play, I think a lot about what stronger players have said to me, and try to use that advice in figuring out where to play/what strategy to employ. However, it also seems that when I'm most conscious of following that advice (or perhaps it's more accurate to say that I'm using that advice to justify my play), that's when I notice things going wrong.I hope that is not the lesson you learned.
Thinking about this particular comment let me to the insight that perhaps one of my biggest problems is seeing how strategy develops over a large scale. That, I think, would explain why I have difficulty figuring out what joseki to pick. Likewise, it seems like it would explain why getting thickness instead of territory never seems to work out well for me.Second, did your invasion after 43 help you a lot? Did it accomplish much beyond taking away some of white’s points - didn’t black have the better potential anyway so you could force white to take his territory while you build much more?
Wait a minute! You yourself admitted that you screwed up the upper left with 7 in the original diagram. (Not quite true, your "hane at the head of 2 stones" that left Black peeping at an immediate cut is the problem. That was not a hane, it was nonsense!) So based on your screw up, you decide the original idea was wrong. No! This later rationalization is what is wrong. Your original idea was excellent. Your later misuse of a proverb, "hane at the head of two stones", was incorrect in this situation. Stick with you own thinking and extend it further to those situations where you insist on slavishly following proverbs. Such proverbs have their place, but they don't apply to every case. We all have to think about what the proverb is about and whether it applies to the current game.Fedya wrote:...
Consider this recent game in which I had White:
I thoughtwas a good move, since it had a dual purpose of expanding my group in the lower left and putting pressure on the black stone at C14. But I quickly erred in the joseki; apparently I should have played
at
and Black would respond with a cross-cut, leaving me to try to figure out the correct follow-up. In the game, I exacerbated my problems by playing the hane at the head of two stones, D15, which doesn't work.
But I can't help but wonder if the problem really goes back to, and whether I should have approached from the other side. I know all of you are going to say that you approach from the open side, which here means approaching from my stone at C16, and that you're not going to lose the game with a slightly inferior move on move 8. Look what happened later in the game:
Having screwed up the top left so badly, I needed to attack someplace else, and I decided that I had to prevent Black from getting the entire bottom of the board. The attack doesn't work, however, and I don't see any other way to even try to stop Black. There's no good place on the bottom to play and allow myself a good extension. Just giving up the entire bottom of the board without a fight, however, doesn't seem like a very good strategy. And it all goes back to, when my play allowed Black to get a pair of extensions on the bottom, leaving me with no place to attack.