Kirby wrote:hman wrote:Kirby wrote:I think that you have a point in that the date might be an identifier that is easier to maintain correctly. "125" has little meaning. "06072011" has little meaning, too, but at least it's easy to generate.
Actually every IT guy (and a lot of others, too) would tell you to reverse the order and use yyyymmdd (20110706 in this case), because in this and only this way "ordering by number" == "ordering by date".
Sure, I'm happy with yyyymmdd, too. That's at least as consistent as ddmmyyyy, and it's nice that you have that feature in ordering.
Being a programming nerd and having to deal with a lot of dated files, I'm very much in support of yyyymmdd.

Also being a nerd, do we need more of an identifier than that? We'll (most likely) end up with games started on the same day and thus have the same identifier. I know the player information should be different, but it's nice to have some thing separate them that is a clear "identifier."
In a related note, I just went through this entire thread and found all of the mishandling of the numbers. Here are the casualties as they stand: 41, 43, 46, 54, 69, 75, 88, and 91.

Also, I will have an update some time soon to the OBITS thread, and may use those numbers to shore up a few games that never ended up with one.

KGS: schultz [?].