Inflation is infectious...?Bill Spight wrote:I first heard that it takes around 9,000 hours to become an expert in the late 1960s.
Understanding
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
schawipp
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:13 am
- Rank: EGF 4k
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 75 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re:
Hi EdLee,
Yep, I agree. However when sitting on the lower orders of magnitude on a logarithmic scale, the higher orders become somehow indistinguishable (and maybe also vice versa). When I speak of "Dan-level players" it means that I will always get a decent crushing when playing them without handicap. Maybe the crushing from a 7d would be even more subtle than from a 1d but the overall result would be pretty much the same - at least for me from my current point of view
.
EdLee wrote:Hi schawipp,schawipp wrote:A dan-level teacher may find it pretty obvious that these groups are weak
and can not imagine that a beginner still struggles in recognizing that obvious fact.
Remember understanding is a continuum.
[...]
Yep, I agree. However when sitting on the lower orders of magnitude on a logarithmic scale, the higher orders become somehow indistinguishable (and maybe also vice versa). When I speak of "Dan-level players" it means that I will always get a decent crushing when playing them without handicap. Maybe the crushing from a 7d would be even more subtle than from a 1d but the overall result would be pretty much the same - at least for me from my current point of view
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
Your understanding is not bad here.schawipp wrote:when sitting on the lower orders of magnitude on a logarithmic scale,
Indeed. But taking 6H from a 1d (you have a chance) versus a pro (no chance),schawipp wrote:I will always get a decent crushing when playing them without handicap.
you can feel the difference, I suspect.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
Aidoneus
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:37 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Indiana
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 176 times
Re: Understanding
It has been 40 years since Robert Pirsig discussed the Greek concept of areté in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (1974). What he understood then may still resonate with some of you youngsters.
See http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_M._Pirsig
IMHO, this book is a classic, but de gustibus non est disputandum.
See http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_M._Pirsig
IMHO, this book is a classic, but de gustibus non est disputandum.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
Aidoneus
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:37 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Indiana
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 176 times
Re:
EdLee wrote:Hi Aidoneus,
Thanks for the reminder. I've wanted to read that book for years now... some day I'll get to it.
Ed, I really think that you would enjoy taking the ride with Pirsig. (Perhaps not so much his follow-up book, Lila. The difference between pointing at the moon and giving a chemical analysis, if you follow my meaning.) As I came from a mathematical background, Pirsig's discussion of the philosophical ideas of Henri Poincaré (a hero of mine) in relation to the concept of quality inspired in me a much deeper appreciation of Eastern ideas and led me to take a long random walk through translations of Chinese literature. Of course, like most everything, I am a mere dilettante.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
Hi Aidoneus, I'm sure you can appreciate Poincaré, Perelman,Aidoneus wrote:Henri Poincaré (a hero of mine)
and Wiles' math infinitely more than I can.
That's very nice. One of mine is Feynman.
YouTube has a lot of nice stuff: Poincaré Conjecture -- Numberphile
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
Culture and Etiquette, 2
Disclaimer: yes, over-generalization is bad,
and we have to be careful of anecdotal evidence.
(a)(b)
Disclaimer: yes, over-generalization is bad,
and we have to be careful of anecdotal evidence.
(a)
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
- topazg
- Tengen
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
- Rank: Nebulous
- GD Posts: 918
- KGS: topazg
- Location: Chatteris, UK
- Has thanked: 1579 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
- Contact:
Re:
EdLee wrote:Sir Ken Robinson: Changing Education Paradigms
That is one of the best videos I've seen in years Ed, thank you very much for sharing...
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
EdLee wrote:Sir Ken Robinson: Changing Education Paradigms
Robinson's ideas are in the humanistic tradition of John Dewey, A. S. Neill, Carl Rogers, and Abraham Maslow. They run counter to the thrust of most education reforms of the current day (in the US, anyway). New recruits for Teach for America, for instance, are taught to run their classrooms more like prisons than factories. As in my day, children are trained to be still, be quiet, be on time, know their place, and conform. But now, under the banner of "No Excuses", they are put in more rigorous straitjackets, especially if they are minorities. Sometimes the teacher in my classes would tell a student to stop looking out the window. Now students get demerits if their eyes are not glued to the teacher at all times.
There is a kind of war going on in public education, with the humanistic side in retreat. Take Weather Woman, for instance (a meteorologist featured in another video). She would like fifth graders to do arithmetic computations almost as well as calculators, if not as fast. But what happens when divergent thinking meets third grade arithmetic? In our schools, divergent thinking loses, as a rule. Weather Woman wants kids to learn not just the right answers, but also the right ways to get those answers. She poo-poos textbooks that ask kids for different ways they can find the answer (an attempt to foster divergent thinking). That does not make them good little calculators. Real mathematicians are creative, akin to poets. When John Conway visits third grade classrooms, kids have fun. Unfortunately, we cannot have a Conway in every elementary classroom.
I came to humanistic education by way of teaching English conversation in Tokyo to adults. My training was in the behaviorist tradition. My students had learned to be quiet.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
Aidoneus
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:37 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Indiana
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 176 times
Re: Understanding
I've never been quite sure what to think of Dewey. Often he wrote about educating the whole person for a life as a citizen in a democracy rather than just training children to become workers, yet he was a strong supporter of William Wirt's Gary Plan (Dewey, Schools of To-Morrow https://archive.org/details/schoolsoftomorro005826mbp). Applauded by Carnegie for producing malleable industrial workers, the Gary Plan involved the implementation of rigid subject rooms and school bells, as well as a strong emphasis on "shop" classes (wood working, metal working), drafting, and other skills useful for industry.
A disclaimer. I graduated from William A. Wirt H.S. in Gary, though by the early 1960s it had fully implemented a tracking system. Some of us took lots of math (geometry using Euclid (!), algebra, trigonometry, calculus), science (biology, chemistry, physics), U.S. and world history (context, not just dates), English (yes, reading classics), foreign languages (Latin, in my case), etc. While the non-college track students were forced into shop classes, home education, consumer math, minimal non-rigorous science, little-to-no reading assignments, history as indoctrination, no extra languages, etc.
So, I just cannot reconcile Dewey's support for Wirt with his vast writings on educational theory.
A couple further references:
Noam Chomsky, Education is Ignorance, http://www.chomsky.info/books/warfare02.htm
John Taylor Gatto, Chap.9, The Underground History of American Public Education, http://www.lewrockwell.com/2010/09/john ... anagement/
A disclaimer. I graduated from William A. Wirt H.S. in Gary, though by the early 1960s it had fully implemented a tracking system. Some of us took lots of math (geometry using Euclid (!), algebra, trigonometry, calculus), science (biology, chemistry, physics), U.S. and world history (context, not just dates), English (yes, reading classics), foreign languages (Latin, in my case), etc. While the non-college track students were forced into shop classes, home education, consumer math, minimal non-rigorous science, little-to-no reading assignments, history as indoctrination, no extra languages, etc.
So, I just cannot reconcile Dewey's support for Wirt with his vast writings on educational theory.
A couple further references:
Noam Chomsky, Education is Ignorance, http://www.chomsky.info/books/warfare02.htm
John Taylor Gatto, Chap.9, The Underground History of American Public Education, http://www.lewrockwell.com/2010/09/john ... anagement/