Page 3 of 14
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:59 pm
by EdLee
paK0,
paK0 wrote: $$Bc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$BcI really want to ignore that and play O8, ...
Pente ?
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:05 pm
by EdLee
Hi Aidoneus, another difference is all you need to toggle coordinates is the letter 'c'.
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:30 pm
by paK0
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:16 pm
by EdLee
Pak0,
Pente =
Gomoku = Five in a Row.
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:33 pm
by paK0
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:00 pm
by EdLee
paK0,
paK0 wrote: Yes, for that game your move looks a lot better then mine^^
Which move ? o8 was your move from your hidden comment, not mine.
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:15 pm
by Kirby
$$Wc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wc
He ignored my attachment. I'm so offended!
Of course, I can hane the tengen or something, since he ignored...
$$Wc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wc But I've got little to attack, and it doesn't put much pressure on his group.
So first, pressure his group more, then make a deeper plan from there...
Can I really give someone 9 stones in a malkovich game?? I dunno.
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:37 pm
by EdLee
Hi Kirby,
Kirby wrote: Can I really give someone 9 stones in a malkovich game?? I dunno.
So I tried 6 -- it's tough!
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:32 pm
by moyoaji
I'm wondering about this cut...
$$Bc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$BcA part of me feels that black should take the time to cut before going back against the Q7 stone. On the other hand, could it be aji-keshi? Perhaps black may wish to play 011 later to go against the R14 stones?
Then again, there's also this option for white as well.
$$Bc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$BcIt's messy, but does give white some free moves. I usually feel that free moves are desperately needed by white in a handicap game. Messing things up can't hurt either.
Final verdict: I'm not sure.
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:56 pm
by paK0
$$Wc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wc
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:31 am
by Kirby
$$Wc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wc
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:46 am
by EdLee
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 10:07 am
by paK0
Kirby really likes his attachments.
But I think this move is a good sign. It's basically a ladder breaker, which means he is not comfortable taking the fight as it is.
For those who don't know what I'm talking about(considering the fact that the people who tend to comment here are all several stones stronger then me that number should be zero):
$$Wc
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$Wc My first instinct is to hane on top. It reactivates the ladder and follows the simple principle of "attach, hane". But I'll need to do some reading before I commit.
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 11:51 am
by Bill Spight
$$B
Click Here To Show Diagram Code [go]$$BOff the top of my head.
Re: #245 Kirby vs. paK0
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 11:56 am
by Uberdude
@Kirby
Kirby wrote: This game, I want to win without overplays.
What happened to this plan?
This has got to be one of the most overplayey crazy starts to a 9 handicap game I've seen in a while!
