Page 3 of 3

Re: Derived Metrics for the Game of Go

Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:24 am
by jaeup
It looks like Korean Baduk Association does not really want to amplify this case, partially because of the pro player's age (just 13). She did admit she used AI. I know "confession alone" cannot be enough to determine if one is guilty, but many players and fans were almost certain that she used AI even before the confession, and I do not think there is any issue left. She did cheat, and I have no doubt about it.

KBA banned her for one year. Well.. many people complain that the punishment is too weak. Again, her age surely was a factor for this decision. From their announcement, it looks like three year ban will be the standard punishment for the future cases.

Re: Derived Metrics for the Game of Go

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:13 am
by jaeup
Just to clarify the new regulation, the future case will be subject to the ban of "at least" three years.

It may be a lifetime ban. We can only guess until the next case happens.

Re: Derived Metrics for the Game of Go

Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:35 am
by jlt
I recently received an e-mail which suggests that China has an AI detection system (the mail says that it will be used for the final stages of the competition https://www.facebook.com/2020WYAWT/). Has anyone heard about it? Is it similar to the one used by Antti Törmänen?