Mike Novack wrote:
Yes,
And bloosqr, stop responding in terms of "real" rank. You should have noticed that I was specifying the rank basis. That's how we should be talking, simply saying what we mean when we give a number. It's not that I consider KGS "real" rank but what you are doing is like insisting that Centigrade is more "real" temperature than Kelvin when what is required is to specify which is being used.
Hey apologies that wasn't me.. but it was my fault. I mangled the quote recursion when I replied to a message so it looked like me. Just went back to fix it.